- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chud the Builder case will be a referendum on self defense in America.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:34 am to Azkiger
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:34 am to Azkiger
quote:
then that would justify the threat he made.
It absolutely wouldn't though. If you show up to a threat armed with deadly force, that's a premeditated act.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:No, you’re half making things up and vomiting idiocy left and right on some SFP-like crusade against MAGA idiots like myself
Ive posted my point as clear as can be posted.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:35 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Always a victim...
Point me to a national news story where the nation is hyper focused on an instance of racism against a white person.
One will do.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:36 am to Azkiger
quote:
If someone said something akin to "If I see you in public you're dead", which people have said, then that would justify the threat he made.
Well now Chud doesn’t get to decide that.
Someone saying on the internet that they are going to kill you doesn’t give you free reign to seek them out, confront them, and shoot them preemptively.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:36 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Ive posted my point as clear as can be posted.
No, you’re half making things up
Ive made nothing up, Dindu.
Facts seem to be yalls kryptonite.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:37 am to GRTiger
quote:
If you show up to a threat armed with deadly force
This assumes Chud knowingly approached the hypothetical X poster who threatened to kill him rather than someone random dude.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:37 am to RogerTheShrubber
Why are you calling me a dindu?
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:38 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Ive made nothing up, Dindu.
You absolutely made up the lie that Chud is my hero.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:38 am to Azkiger
quote:
This assumes Chud knowingly approached the hypothetical X poster who threatened to kill him rather than someone random dude.
No, he clearly stated he was going to kill a black person, he did.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:39 am to Azkiger
quote:
You absolutely made up the lie that Chud is my hero.
Youre still in here knighting for this pussy.
There is no scenario where he is justified here.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:39 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No, he clearly stated he was going to kill a black person, he did.
This conversation is over your head. Go back to the kids table.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:39 am to Azkiger
Well, yes, I assumed that because it's the only way your hypothetical makes even a little sense.
In your new hypothetical, you're justifying a random threat and excusing a threat by Chud that he immediately followed up on. How do you reconcile that?
In your new hypothetical, you're justifying a random threat and excusing a threat by Chud that he immediately followed up on. How do you reconcile that?
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:40 am to ReauxlTide222
Who is Chud the builder 
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:41 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Youre still in here knighting for this pussy.
Wrong, again...
Nope, just saying that he may have a case for self defense. I want to see the courthouse video.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:42 am to Azkiger
quote:
This conversation is over your head.
Poor dindu. A sad day for you.
You can write Chud in prison if that will help you.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:44 am to teke184
quote:
Charges are only “attempted murder”. It hasn’t been clear because there has been a lot of contradicting info throughout this whole mess.
They’ll more than likely get him on the fed-posting he was doing on X.
Even besides the fact that he’s an a-hole, the guy has no charisma whatsoever. Listening to him talk on livestreams is like watching paint dry.
This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 10:46 am
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:44 am to Azkiger
quote:
Wrong, again...
Still at it. Maybe you should volunteer to help Chud with his court caser.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:46 am to justaniceguy
quote:
This is what chud was filming. Showing what life is like in these parts of the country that white people decided to stop going to a long time ago.
The only clips I have seen of his outside the courthouse video have been him walking around Broad Street in Nashville, the most touristy area in Tennessee, flirting with white girls and hurling insults at others, daring them to do something. I don’t know about the Clarksville courthouse, but I know for a fact that white people have not abandoned Broad Street.
There are actually several channels out there that focus on visiting poor areas. But I have never seen those other people hurling insults trying to instigate a confrontation. I don’t know why so many people are upset for Chud, he got exactly what he wanted. He wanted to provoke someone and shoot them. Now we get to see if he was correct in his hypothesis that he will walk free.
He got what he wanted, I am not sure why so many people are outraged.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:46 am to GRTiger
quote:
Well, yes, I assumed that because it's the only way your hypothetical makes even a little sense.
In your new hypothetical, you're justifying a random threat and excusing a threat by Chud that he immediately followed up on. How do you reconcile that?
I'll lay it out for you.
Hypothetically...
Chud says racist shite on X for clicks.
Someone gets upset and says they'll kill him if they see him (which has happened).
Chud responds to that particular threat with a racially laced threat of "No, I'll kill you, walk, and your people will riot".
Chud, days later is in public. Gets into an argument with someone because that's what he does. While arguing, he gets attacked and shoots said attacker.
How does telling a random X user online that he'll kill someone if they try and kill him prevent him from being able to use self defense laws when the attacker in question isn't the person who made the threat?
Posted on 5/16/26 at 10:46 am to SDVTiger
He’s quiet the character
I learned about him 3 weeks ago and my first response to my buddy was “this guy will be shot in the back of the head before we know it.”
The I proceeded to tell my buddy he’s an idiot for following this guy and that there’s nothing cool or relevant about him. He’s the bad guy in these situations.
Which makes me think even more poorly of Roger and bee. fricking imbeciles those two.
I learned about him 3 weeks ago and my first response to my buddy was “this guy will be shot in the back of the head before we know it.”
The I proceeded to tell my buddy he’s an idiot for following this guy and that there’s nothing cool or relevant about him. He’s the bad guy in these situations.
Which makes me think even more poorly of Roger and bee. fricking imbeciles those two.
Popular
Back to top



1




