- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chud the Builder case will be a referendum on self defense in America.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:00 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:00 am to RogerTheShrubber
I'm not a TN Lawyer but I will post something from a TN lawyer that seems relevant.
Self-Defense in Tennessee: When Can It Be Used in Violent Crime?
The crucial variable that is likely going to doom him is the proportionality aspect (which is what I searched for to find this article).
The next 2 don't seem to be in his favor, either
So the combination of provoking + disproportionate force is likely going to work against him in a major way.
This isn't as simple as "fighting words" or this very gross, very weird racial justice angle I keep seeing posted with this story.
Self-Defense in Tennessee: When Can It Be Used in Violent Crime?
quote:
Many defendants mistakenly believe that self-defense provides an escape from jail. The reality is that Tennessee places the burden on the defendant to present enough evidence to support this claim. Once raised, the prosecution must then disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt. That sounds simple, but it’s not. Here’s why.
quote:
Under Tennessee Code Annotated § 39-11-611, a person is justified in using force when they reasonably believe it is necessary to protect themselves or another from imminent harm.
The following description breaks down into several core concepts:
Imminence: The threat must be immediate—not hypothetical or distant.
Reasonable belief: The person must believe force is necessary, and that belief must be deemed reasonable from the standpoint of an average person.
Proportionality: The force used must not exceed what’s necessary to stop the threat.
The crucial variable that is likely going to doom him is the proportionality aspect (which is what I searched for to find this article).
quote:
1. “He Hit Me First—So I Was Allowed to Hit Back.”
Not necessarily. If you respond with disproportionate force—like pulling a weapon in response to a shove—you could still face charges.
The next 2 don't seem to be in his favor, either
quote:
2. “It Was Self-Defense Because I Was Afraid.”
Fear alone doesn’t justify using force. The fear must be reasonable and the threat imminent.
3. “I Was Standing My Ground.”
This defense fails if you were trespassing, provoking the other person, or involved in criminal conduct at the time.
So the combination of provoking + disproportionate force is likely going to work against him in a major way.
This isn't as simple as "fighting words" or this very gross, very weird racial justice angle I keep seeing posted with this story.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:06 am to RogerTheShrubber
Legally this case may or may not be a quagmire, I am not a criminal defense attorney or prosecutor, so I don’t really know.
Man code, however, dictates if you antagonize enough random men on the street, you will eventually get your arse whooped and you will have deserved it.
However, you don’t deserve to be killed over calling someone a name, which is, at the end of the day, what this guys schtick is.
But he seems to be a formidable guy himself so while the beating appears rather severe, it could be interpreted as the appropriate amount of violence.
Then there is the angle of if the shot guy was “hunting” the idiot for some type of bounty. I’m not even sure the retard called the shot guy, or anyone he was with, any names. Then it would revert back to two idiots met on the street and one was trying to get away.
At the end of the day, I’m leaning towards upholding man code. Attempted murder, however, due to the bounty, might be a bit harsh. I’d think any felony conviction that puts him in prison for 2-3 years and prevents such an antagonistic retard from carrying again in the future, would suffice.
ETA: Having only ever heard of this guy after his arrest, I’ve only watched a couple of short videos. In one he is with a bunch of retards walking up to random strangers, all in uniform and waving their flag and screaming “white power” and throwing Nazi salutes and doing the goose stepping thing. He and his cohorts were all tough looking dudes and brawls broke out. The other was of him having a thoughtful and calm discussion about the use of the word with a random non agitated black guy on the street. They apparently came to an understanding and basically hugged it out and went their separate ways. Had he built his reputation on seeking interactions such as the latter, one could argue his intention was to have legitimate debate. In my opinion, the former eclipses any other intent.
Man code, however, dictates if you antagonize enough random men on the street, you will eventually get your arse whooped and you will have deserved it.
However, you don’t deserve to be killed over calling someone a name, which is, at the end of the day, what this guys schtick is.
But he seems to be a formidable guy himself so while the beating appears rather severe, it could be interpreted as the appropriate amount of violence.
Then there is the angle of if the shot guy was “hunting” the idiot for some type of bounty. I’m not even sure the retard called the shot guy, or anyone he was with, any names. Then it would revert back to two idiots met on the street and one was trying to get away.
At the end of the day, I’m leaning towards upholding man code. Attempted murder, however, due to the bounty, might be a bit harsh. I’d think any felony conviction that puts him in prison for 2-3 years and prevents such an antagonistic retard from carrying again in the future, would suffice.
ETA: Having only ever heard of this guy after his arrest, I’ve only watched a couple of short videos. In one he is with a bunch of retards walking up to random strangers, all in uniform and waving their flag and screaming “white power” and throwing Nazi salutes and doing the goose stepping thing. He and his cohorts were all tough looking dudes and brawls broke out. The other was of him having a thoughtful and calm discussion about the use of the word with a random non agitated black guy on the street. They apparently came to an understanding and basically hugged it out and went their separate ways. Had he built his reputation on seeking interactions such as the latter, one could argue his intention was to have legitimate debate. In my opinion, the former eclipses any other intent.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:07 am to hogcard1964
quote:
Unless someone used words as a threat to my family, why would I attack someone that called me a derogatory native "Indian" name?
What kinda coward shite is this… so a guy can call your wife or daughter a bitch in front of you??
This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 8:12 am
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:08 am to Woolfpack
quote:
Man code, however, dictates if you antagonize enough random men on the street, you will eventually get your arse whooped and you will have deserved it.
There are a lot of people posting here who do not believe this. They cannot grasp the concept.
But its objective fact.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:09 am to Woolfpack
quote:
However, you don’t deserve to be killed over calling someone a name, which is, at the end of the day, what this guys schtick is.
But he seems to be a formidable guy himself so while the beating appears rather severe, it could be interpreted as the appropriate amount of violence
Yep, dont attack people and you may not get shot.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:11 am to lepdagod
quote:
so a guy can your wife or daughter a bitch in front of you??
Sure sounds like it.
I think we have some really soft baws here. They wouldnt stand up for their wife.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:11 am to lepdagod
quote:
What kinda coward shite is this… so a guy can your wife or daughter a bitch in front of you??
I don't know what you're attempting to say, but re-read my post.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:12 am to lepdagod
quote:
What kinda coward shite is this… so a guy can your wife or daughter a bitch in front of you??
It’s probably best to just walk away these days. Things are just different now. I’m physically fit know how to fight and have been in more physical altercations than I would like to admit in my high school and college and even after college days. Is it really worth it over being called a name? Just move on. Better yet just avoid events, areas, etc that have low IQ people in them.
This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 8:13 am
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:12 am to hogcard1964
quote:
Yep, dont attack people and you may not get shot.
Similar to don't shoot people who don't pose a proportionate threat
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:12 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I think we have some really soft baws here. They wouldnt stand up for their wife.
This is rich.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:13 am to ronricks
quote:
It’s probably best to just walk away these days.
It's always better to walk away.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:14 am to hogcard1964
quote:
don't know what you're attempting to say, but re-read my post.
I read your post… it’s a line men can’t cross with other men… I don’t care if it’s just words or not…
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:20 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Next time one of these frickers talk about "culcha" this needs to be thrown in their face.
This one off incident is proof of culture?
Imagine that... There's this one white prick shooting his mouth off so you can't call out the 13/50 phenomenon.
That's your defense?
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Similar to don't shoot people who don't pose a proportionate threat
We actually agree. Non-lethal threats and actions should never be met with lethal responses.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
He’s an idiot. But don’t punch people because they say words that are “mean”. I think Chud should do some time, but so should the idiot who punched him.
Also, what a blight black culture is on America and civilization in general.
Also, what a blight black culture is on America and civilization in general.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:22 am to Azkiger
quote:
This one off incident is proof of culture?
The incessant "he was a good boy" coming from the ChudthePud fans.
Its indefensible. Yet here we are.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:23 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Humans are violent, its not reasonable to expect otherwise. This is not opinion, this is fact.
You keep making this same point in various ways even though I’ve never contested it.
quote:
ChudthePud went fishing for a reaction, got one and now he's going to pay for it.
Still doesn’t justify someone attacking him.
Would the leftist that attacked Tesla dealerships be justified for their acts of terrorism due to the fact they were offended?
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:24 am to jnethe1
quote:
You keep making this same point in various ways even though I’ve never contested it.
Many here have, and they are idiots.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Similar to don't shoot people who don't pose a proportionate threat
Wasn't he getting attacked though?
Posted on 5/16/26 at 8:27 am to jnethe1
I think it’s absolutely insane but par for the course with this place that many think it’s completely defensible for this total trash bag to go around instigating and getting in black people’s faces yelling every racist word possible to them.
Most of these people call themselves Christian but long for a world where they can treat others they perceive different than them has sub human. Honestly, many of you need some self reflection. This guy is an absolute evil piece of shite.
Most of these people call themselves Christian but long for a world where they can treat others they perceive different than them has sub human. Honestly, many of you need some self reflection. This guy is an absolute evil piece of shite.
This post was edited on 5/16/26 at 8:29 am
Popular
Back to top



1



