- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chief Justice Roberts doesn't understand reality
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:11 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:11 pm to boosiebadazz
Wouldn't you think keeping his trap shut to not show potential bias about a possible forthcoming case would be one of them?
1
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:11 pm to IceTiger
Independence (and therefore legitimacy) of the judiciary 
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:12 pm to Smart Post
Link me to where he discussed the merits of the case.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:17 pm to Wtodd
Tell y’all one thing: we’re in a pretty stellar position as a country when CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS is the 5th most conservative Justice on SCOTUS in a 5-4 conservative majority, hella better than when Kennedy was the swing Justice OMG that BS
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:18 pm to Wtodd
Roberts is compromised.
I'm not sure what they have on him, if it only some kind of irregularity or illegality surrounding his adoptions or something bigger.
But he is compromised.
I'm not sure what they have on him, if it only some kind of irregularity or illegality surrounding his adoptions or something bigger.
But he is compromised.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:19 pm to Boatshoes
Except when he rules the way you agree with!
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:23 pm to Wtodd
Roberts is worthless. He is the idiot that basically gave us Obamacare.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:25 pm to Boatshoes
He isn’t compromised.
He’s a typical Bush appointee. It’s not a bug it’s a feature.
Jesus fricking Christ. The GOP ruling class did not suddenly grow balls and turn right when trump was elected. All trump’s election has done is highlight that the Republican Party is a center-right moderate party.
He’s a typical Bush appointee. It’s not a bug it’s a feature.
Jesus fricking Christ. The GOP ruling class did not suddenly grow balls and turn right when trump was elected. All trump’s election has done is highlight that the Republican Party is a center-right moderate party.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:27 pm to Wtodd
Bush judges and Clinton judges have mostly been impartial.
Obama nominated a shite ton of activist judges who consistently make shite rulings based on personal politics
Obama nominated a shite ton of activist judges who consistently make shite rulings based on personal politics
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:28 pm to Wtodd
quote:
Roberts said on the day before Thanksgiving that an “independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
He wiped his arse with the constitution to give us Obamacare so he could prove his independence....
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:34 pm to Wtodd
I've said it in a number of threads.....Roberts is going to go left in this new court. Like he did with the ACA, he's going to get more political.
He doesn't want the court viewed as a Republican stronghold.
He doesn't want the court viewed as a Republican stronghold.
This post was edited on 11/21/18 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:42 pm to Wtodd
He is now the swing vote.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:43 pm to Tiger985
What does Roberts care? He has life tenure, he’s beholden to two things and two things only: the Constitution and the American law all that entails not what people perceive SCOTUS to be, man that notion can suck a DICK
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:50 pm to boosiebadazz
Oh this is just god damned rich
A leftist whining about “politicizing” the court
Only a concern when one party has the presidency
Do you actually believe your own bullshite?
A leftist whining about “politicizing” the court
Only a concern when one party has the presidency
Do you actually believe your own bullshite?
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:58 pm to Wtodd
Roberts is morphing into RBG as life escapes her body.
It's like the old Denzel Washington movie where "a demon" hopped for person to person to spread evil.
ETA... fixed above comment for accuracy.
It's like the old Denzel Washington movie where "a demon" hopped for person to person to spread evil.
ETA... fixed above comment for accuracy.
This post was edited on 11/21/18 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 11/21/18 at 1:00 pm to gthog61
You’re such an angry, bitter old man. I sometimes feel bad for you.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 1:03 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
If we nakedly politicize the Court and it becomes accepted for judges to disregard the law and vote the way their politician nominators prefer
What fricking world do you live in where you haven't realized that the left has been doing this for decades. You are one stupid frick.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 1:11 pm to boosiebadazz
Independence (and therefore legitimacy)
Not so fast my friend.
Not so fast my friend.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 1:15 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
If we nakedly politicize the Court and it becomes accepted for judges to disregard the law and vote the way their politician nominators prefer, don’t be surprised to wake up one day to an unabashedly liberal, SJW Court literally making it up as we go
Uh, that's what's going on in some courts already. Thomas just verbally long donged the ninth for this shite.
Posted on 11/21/18 at 1:16 pm to Wtodd
What exactly is the problem with Roberts comments here?
We shouldn’t refer to these judges based on who appointed them. We also shouldn’t view the decisions of the federal judiciary through the lens of the politician who appointed the judge to office.
Aligning all judges and their decisions with a certain presided is shortsighted, ignorant, and hyper-partisan to begin with.
It helps nothing when people say “x presidents apointee”, provides zero insight into the judicial reasoning, and is generally a misguided attempt to discredit an unfavorable decision.
We shouldn’t refer to these judges based on who appointed them. We also shouldn’t view the decisions of the federal judiciary through the lens of the politician who appointed the judge to office.
Aligning all judges and their decisions with a certain presided is shortsighted, ignorant, and hyper-partisan to begin with.
It helps nothing when people say “x presidents apointee”, provides zero insight into the judicial reasoning, and is generally a misguided attempt to discredit an unfavorable decision.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News