- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: checking Drudge, looks like L.A. could be in trouble
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:48 am to SmackoverHawg
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:48 am to SmackoverHawg
quote:
Bush's fault
Mission accomplished, or too soon?
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:00 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
or too soon?
Too soon!!! Don't wanna jinx it.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:07 am to udtiger
Climate change and fracking are responsible for the increase in earthquakes.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:10 am to Mac
quote:
Climate change and fracking are responsible for the increase in earthquakes.
I'm not familiar with you or your post history and too lazy to read through it, but ARE YOU FOR frickING SERIOUS????!!!!!
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:25 am to SmackoverHawg
I'm joking, but the Cali legislature did ask that some geologist study the connection between fracking and earthquakes.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 12:16 pm to Mac
quote:
I'm joking, but the Cali legislature did ask that some geologist study the connection between fracking and earthquakes.
I figured. But this is the poli board. Can never be too careful. If there is evidence this is true. I'm going to start a fracking company near ,the bay area next to my coal furnace, and monster truck track. And if I can get my hands on some HAARP technology...kiss those mf'ers goodbye!!! Cali turns RED!!! New republican stronghold.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 12:21 pm to udtiger
quote:
hypothetical question based on some reports.
Reports made by scientists. Scientists are obviously dumb, biased, pinko, godless atheists. There's nothing to see here! Why would you waste this boards time with Science? We're all far too smart to give any credence to scientists.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 1:14 pm to Aubie Spr96
As an Aubie don't you live in a tornado threatened region o the country? I am left hoping that one will hit your trailer park soon.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 1:26 pm to udtiger
we didn't abandon NO & it doesn't matter to the country at all, so I think we'll keep L.A. for the long haul.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 2:00 pm to SmackoverHawg
quote:
how would this country make it without LA, Oakland, Compton and San Fran
I dislike the area myself due to the vast amount of idiots, but don't be so ignorant to think that a major city or two of that size getting leveled wouldn't have a negative affect on our economy.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 2:02 pm to deltaland
quote:
I dislike the area myself due to the vast amount of idiots, but don't be so ignorant to think that a major city or two of that size getting leveled wouldn't have a negative affect on our economy.
Addition by subtraction? We could certainly recover. It wouldn't be as bad a losing Nebraska for instance.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:34 pm to udtiger
The problem is that places like LA are a time bomb. There will be a big earthquake one day that will cause major devastation, we just don't know if that is tomorrow or in 100 years. Honestly, now that we know the dangers of certain areas, we need to make a lot better choices on where to build. I live in NOLA, but this place will be beachfront property when I die. We need to look at the longevity of certain places we want to build at, and understand the consequences.
Also, screw living in Manhattan. Imagine what would happen in the event of a real disaster there. Why people are still living in dense urban areas doesn't make sense to me.
Also, screw living in Manhattan. Imagine what would happen in the event of a real disaster there. Why people are still living in dense urban areas doesn't make sense to me.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:44 pm to udtiger
quote:
If you are the Mayor (or the Governor), do you order an evacuation?
Where are you gonna evacuate 18 million people to, and how do you move them quickly in a way that won't become the mother of all clusterfricks?
This post was edited on 3/30/14 at 4:45 pm
Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:46 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
.
So all those po white people in Alabama should move there trailers out of a known tornado alley? got it
Never fails
Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:48 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
Also, screw living in Manhattan. Imagine what would happen in the event of a real disaster there. Why people are still living in dense urban areas doesn't make sense to me.
The ice storm in Montreal in 1998 was pretty bad. Imagine parts of NY being without power for weeks, or months.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 5:33 pm to CITWTT
Keep dreaming.
The next time an entire city the size of New Orleans is destroyed by a tornado and BILLIONS of tax payer dollars have to be spent to rebuild it, you let me know. In the mean time, I'll continue to pay my home owners to make sure you don't have to pay for my choice to live here.
The next time an entire city the size of New Orleans is destroyed by a tornado and BILLIONS of tax payer dollars have to be spent to rebuild it, you let me know. In the mean time, I'll continue to pay my home owners to make sure you don't have to pay for my choice to live here.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 5:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
You libertarians are sure good at internet.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 5:37 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
You libertarians are sure good at internet.
In the context of what was posted, that makes absolutely no sense.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 5:42 pm to SmackoverHawg
quote:
Addition by subtraction? We could certainly recover. It wouldn't be as bad a losing Nebraska for instance.
Most of our tech innovation comes from the Bay area.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News