- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:44 am to Korkstand
quote:
Korkstand
Shouldn’t you and your ANTIFA friends be beating up an elderly white woman or robbing a Lowe’s or CVS by now? Good God man, it’s damn near 9 AM on the left coast. I mean, the cops out there shouldn’t have an issue. They seem to support the terrorist network called ANTIFA, plus...like good little Bundes workers, y’all all probably have your vaccine passports.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:48 am to jimmy the leg
You're trying to be funny, but your message is mostly true....
Posted on 9/9/21 at 10:54 am to oogabooga68
quote:
You're trying to be funny, but your message is mostly true....
Who said I was trying to be funny? Anyone that has been on here for any extended period of time knows of Korkstand’s affinity for all things ANTIFA. It isn’t exactly a secret.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:05 am to jimmy the leg
That makes him no better than a skinhead in my book.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:09 am to the808bass
quote:
Sigh. You absolute fricking idiot. Quit talking about things you don’t understand.
quote:Again, you seem to be conflating absolute risk reduction with absolute risk or incidence rate for purposes of calculating a reasonably accurate NNV.
Relative risk reduction is directly figured from absolute risk reduction. You fricking absolute idiot.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:09 am to oogabooga68
quote:
We accept your tapout.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:09 am to jimmy the leg
quote:My god you're such a liar. I consider "antifa" to be a non-issue and always have. I think it's hilarious that you guys make it out as such a boogeyman.
Anyone that has been on here for any extended period of time knows of Korkstand’s affinity for all things ANTIFA. It isn’t exactly a secret.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:11 am to Korkstand
quote:
My god you're such a liar. I consider "antifa" to be a non-issue and always have. I think it's hilarious that you guys make it out as such a boogeyman.
Do you denounce ANTIFA???!!!????
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:11 am to Korkstand
quote:
Again, you seem to be conflating absolute risk reduction with absolute risk or incidence rate for purposes of calculating a reasonably accurate NNV.
This is the word salad of a self-confused person. You lost. The whole thread. You revealed you don’t know anything about this discussion. You posted several absolute gems revealing that in stark contrast. You’re a fricking idiot. Own it.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:26 am to Korkstand
quote:
I'll say it again, a webpage titled "Immunization: The Basics" plays no role in our legal system.
And, pray tell, what in the ever living f*ck do you think this "guidance" is for?
Seriously, you just can't be THIS F*CKING STUPID so quit trying.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:30 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Four legs good, two legs **** better!
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:43 am to the808bass
quote:Let me try to break it down more simply, then.
This is the word salad of a self-confused person. You lost. The whole thread. You revealed you don’t know anything about this discussion. You posted several absolute gems revealing that in stark contrast. You’re a fricking idiot. Own it.
You are trying to pass off an NNV figure calculated from a short term study as if it is meaningful. You said yourself that the study should be longer in order to get the control incidence higher. If that were done, the ARR would grow larger, and as a consequence NNV smaller, while RRR would hold reasonably steady (assuming the sample size was computed correctly).
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:50 am to Korkstand
quote:
You are trying to pass off an NNV figure calculated from a short term study as if it is meaningful
The NNV is directly correlated to the vaccine efficacy. If it’s not meaningful, the study efficacy isn’t either.
quote:
that were done, the ARR would grow larger, and as a consequence NNV smaller, while RRR would hold reasonably steady
That’s what the Pfizer marketing department would say. Instead of continuing the study, they blew it up.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 11:56 am to Korkstand
Wow...I didn't know you actually sided with those Antifa-Nazis.....do you know how evil that makes you?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:16 pm to the808bass
quote:But the part that you're ignoring is that NNV is also correlated with the length of the study.
The NNV is directly correlated to the vaccine efficacy.
A simple example:
10k vaccinated and 10k control
After 1 month, 100 control are infected (1% incidence) and 10 vaccinated are infected.
ARR is .01-.001 = .009 = 0.9%
RRR is .009/.01 = 0.9 = 90%
NNV is 10,000/90 = 111
Good so far?
Now let's extend to 2 months. Assuming efficacy hasn't waned much, we would expect 200 and 20 infections, which gives:
ARR is .02-.002 = .018 = 1.8% (doubled)
RRR is .018/.02 = 0.9 = 90% (stayed the same)
NNV is 10,000/180 = 56 (cut in half)
Even if after 2 months the vaccine efficacy dropped significantly and 50 new vaccinated were infected vs 10 the first month, ARR still rises from 0.9% to 1.4% and NNV still falls from 111 to 71.
Can you point out any obvious errors in this greatly simplified example? Is it not clear that NNV from a short term study is kind of meaningless?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:17 pm to oogabooga68
quote:I didn't know that, either. That's the power of repeated lies.
Wow...I didn't know you actually sided with those Antifa-Nazis
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:23 pm to Korkstand
quote:
That's the power of repeated lies.
Hey, have you ever heard of the word "irony"?
Asking for friends.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:26 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
Sorry, then that makes you a simpleton and or a liar.
If you can look at the world around you and pass off what is going on as mere "incompetence", then you are really, really, really not as smart or well-informed as you incessantly bleat on about.
Of course, using the word "suffice" is sort of a tell.
If you are OK with an answer that is simply "sufficient" regarding a world-changing event, then that tells us you are either complicit or complacent.
Either way, for us dumb ole hill folk who rely on common-sense, none of this passes the smell test ESPECIALLY when so many "experts" along with those in charge have been acting like Bond villains intent on world domination.
You have a lot more faith in the competence and coordination skills of our leaders than I do.
I simply can’t believe those people are good enough at anything to pull off such a grand centralized conspiracy, let alone keep it under wraps to any meaningful degree.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News