re: CDC covered up study showing 1135% increase in autism with Hep B vaccine…

quote:

---

The biggest driver of the “rise” in autism is how the diagnosis itself has changed over time. 

---

So why is it that people my age never knew one person with autism in their entire childhood. It didn't exist when I was a child. Neither did childhood obesity and diabetes. Something is definitely wrong here folks. I agree with RFK that we must look into this.

quote:

---

Is any of this naturally occurring in a one month old?"

---

HepB is a bad hill to die on, then, because infection is possible within 1 month and no, it doesn't require sexual contact for infection.

quote:

---

Why anyone would jeopardize a newborns health over something a bureaucrat recommends is retarded. And the doctors are a big part of the bureaucracy.

---

Why anyone would jeopardize their child's health over some blog posts with bad information is beyond me too...

No link to such study. Wait! It’s because they “covered it up”.
The abstract was not a scientific study. A scientific study later followed, and showed no association between vaccines and autism.

There are many ignorant people that don’t understand the reason for the increase in the diagnosis of ASD. They continue to blame vaccines in the low IQ’s lap it up.

This is where RFK‘s outrageous and debunked claim began.
LINK

quote:

---

Point 1: This claim is not supported by actual research In scientific research, abstracts like this one are often a first look at data, designed to point towards future work. They are not peer-reviewed and usually provide very limited detail. In this case, we learn almost nothing about where the data is from, how they measured autism diagnosis rates, how they measured vaccination rates, or differences across different groups.

---

quote:

---

The way science works is that after an abstract, authors will move on to produce a paper in which they usually provide more details, do more careful analysis, and often add more data. The abstract is a first step of the research process. These researchers did that. In 2003, they published a more complete paper in the journal Pediatrics, which showed no link between autism and thimerosal exposure. Review data based on multiple papers shows a similar result.

---

TLDR- no link between vaccines and ASD. Again!

EDT: I now see that SFP posted the same

quote:

---

Whew... just a 768% increase. It's good to know.. years AFTER we trusted the medical authorities that our children only had a seven fold increase risk of autism.

---

Nope. That was debunked as well.

It’s almost as if the womb-to-tomb board posters are having conniptions that people are backing away from constant government regulations. So they need to defend it.

No one’s saying pharma is a saint. They aren't. Of course they spend money on ads and lobbying, just like oil companies, banks, and Big Tech do. But it’s a leap from “corporations push their interests” to “vaccines don’t work” or “doctors are bought off.” If every pediatrician were chasing bonuses, you’d expect wildly different advice from one clinic to the next. Instead, you see remarkable consistency worldwide, across rich and poor countries alike. That’s because the evidence on vaccines is strong enough to hold up no matter who’s footing the bill.

Yeah we’re lucky the world survived this long without the hep-b vaccine for newborns, you know, children’s health and all.

As soon as I saw 1135% increase I knew this was another bullshite X post.

There is an insane movement by radicals who want to undo decades of
scientific advances in disease prevention. Sadly, it’s become political.
Anti-establishment MAGA zealots versus anything that’s gone before…