Started By
Message

Carroll's lawyer R Kaplan and the Manhattan Fedral Judge L Kaplan are related.

Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:04 pm
Posted by pecxs
Pasadena, CA
Member since Dec 2003
511 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:04 pm
quote:

Trump lawyer Alina Habba said she was unaware Manhattan federal Judge Lewis Kaplan and Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan worked together in the early 1990s at the same powerhouse white-shoe law firm until Saturday, when asked about it by Post columnist Charles Gasparino, who was told by a source that the judge was once Roberta Kaplan’s “mentor.

“It was never disclosed. It’s insane and so incestuous,” Habba said, insisting neither the 79-year-old judge nor Roberta Kaplan, 57, who aren’t related, disclosed the “conflict of interest” and a violation of judicial ethics rules.

LINK
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71238 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:05 pm to
Doesn’t matter, OMB!!
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2291 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:09 pm to
This is a serious issue. The judge should have disclosed this personal and professional relationship. Habba is going to have a buffet of issues for appeal.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Member since Nov 2023
3048 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Carroll's lawyer R Kaplan and the Manhattan Fedral Judge L Kaplan are related.
quote:

“It was never disclosed. It’s insane and so incestuous,” Habba said, insisting neither the 79-year-old judge nor Roberta Kaplan, 57, who aren’t related, disclosed the “conflict of interest”

Ummmm.....
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34024 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:15 pm to



I’ve called it what it is from the beginning…politically persecution.
Posted by GCTigahs
Member since Oct 2014
2028 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:17 pm to
So nobody thought to check out Kaplan and Kaplan when the damn trial started?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
14307 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

Manhattan federal Judge Lewis Kaplan and Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan worked together in the early 1990s at the same powerhouse white-shoe law firm until Saturday, when asked about it by Post columnist Charles Gasparino, who was told by a source that the judge was once Roberta Kaplan’s “mentor.


Is this not an issue?
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2291 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:19 pm to
Personal and undisclosed friendships can be a basis for disqualification. A judge may have to recuse even where there isn’t an immediate family member in the case. I’m not sure if this relationship would have required recusal. But the problem here is that the judge failed to disclose. If the information had been disclosed, Trump could have filed a recusal motion. This is a big deal, in my view.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
9411 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:19 pm to
Title is wrong. They aren't related, they worked together and one was the others mentor.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421771 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Carroll's lawyer R Kaplan and the Manhattan Fedral Judge L Kaplan are related.


quote:

the 79-year-old judge nor Roberta Kaplan, 57, who aren’t related


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421771 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Is this not an issue?


If it was 30-ish years ago, unlikely.
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
2291 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 8:42 pm to
As a matter of course, the judge should have disclosed that he worked in private practice with plaintiff’s counsel. Any judge worth his salt would do this. I know federal and state judges who routinely recuse sua sponte from cases involving former law partners.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15653 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:01 pm to
Look at the judge in Georgia having worked in Fani Willis' office.

This stuff is crazy.
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
637 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:19 pm to
Not sure your article matches your title. Enough to hate about the trial without twisting facts. Not related but close ties.
Posted by FMtTXtiger
Member since Oct 2018
3704 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:34 pm to
I bet if they do a 23 and me they are related .
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105393 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 9:52 pm to
Not only worked with her, but was her mentor. That takes on a more personal tone having worked so closely.

It deserved to be known prior to trial. I think this gets overturned by other measures however.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
19386 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 10:08 pm to
Change your title, sport.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
10917 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

Manhattan federal Judge


This was federal?
Posted by CecildaDiesel
Member since Jun 2020
38 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 11:16 pm to
she 1000% knew and wanted the issue for appeal. for a regular joe this likely wouldn't warrant recusal but would warrant disclosure. For a president, it warrants both. Great strategy honestly
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 11:19 pm
Posted by CecildaDiesel
Member since Jun 2020
38 posts
Posted on 1/27/24 at 11:18 pm to
exactly -- a quick call up to the bench and then putting it on the record at the very least -- i still think she knew. how you wouldn't is almost malpractice for not doing your research on the opposing counsel and judge
This post was edited on 1/27/24 at 11:19 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram