- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Carroll's lawyer R Kaplan and the Manhattan Fedral Judge L Kaplan are related.
Posted on 1/28/24 at 5:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/28/24 at 5:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Totally absurd that any one would accept being talked down to by a member for the legal somewhat profession.
1974, first semester Loyola law school, professor described the following widely accepted mantra
If the facts are on your side argue the facts
If the law is on your side argue the law
If neither the facts or law are on your side just argue
Absolutely no application of ethics or logic by the legal profession
1974, first semester Loyola law school, professor described the following widely accepted mantra
If the facts are on your side argue the facts
If the law is on your side argue the law
If neither the facts or law are on your side just argue
Absolutely no application of ethics or logic by the legal profession
1
Posted on 1/28/24 at 5:55 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
If the facts are on your side argue the facts
If the law is on your side argue the law
If neither the facts or law are on your side just argue
That's not how it goes, FWIW.
*ETA: or at least I've never heard it that way the 1000 times someone has said it to me
This post was edited on 1/28/24 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
How would a "dupe lefty ball washer" have responded differently?
I don't know what that is, and I'm not one, so I can't really say
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:03 pm to oogabooga68
quote:
this should have never gone to trial.
How does that get accomplished, legally?
quote:
Don't pretend your trolling and shitposting are any less crazy.
No trolling and my posts are nowhere near what that guy was posting ITT
quote:
You ask for these responses then act surprised when they happen.
No. This guy came out of nowhere off the top rope of Idiocracy
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:07 pm to GCTigahs
So nobody thought to check out Kaplan and Kaplan when the damn trial started?
__________________________________________________
This speaks to the incompetency of the Trump legal team.
Ten minutes on Google would have uncovered this.
__________________________________________________
This speaks to the incompetency of the Trump legal team.
Ten minutes on Google would have uncovered this.
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
My dude, historically you have been consistent in being against the usage of state power to crush individuals, except here.
What gives?
What gives?
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:20 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
My dude, historically you have been consistent in being against the usage of state power to crush individuals, except here.
This is a civil action between private parties.
When we had a few anarcos on the board years ago this was a sticking point of why I argued against Big L libertarianism. They argued for private courts, which I don't think would be a better option for him in this instance (if she got to pick her Court, judge, and procedure before the case began).
This isn't a state/police action.
This post was edited on 1/28/24 at 6:21 pm
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:If you don't know don't know what that is, how do you know "I'm not one"??
I don't know what that is
---
I'm not one
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This isn't a state/police action.
But it is.
The machinery of the state is being is being deployed to crush an individual.
From unlocking the SOL, from utilizing a hand-picked "victim", to the final set up with a biased judge and jury.
There is no justice being done here.
This is a mockery of justice.
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:27 pm to pecxs
By any means necessary
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:31 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The machinery of the state is being is being deployed to crush an individual.
Again, if her billionaire backers created a private court for her to sue Trump in, do you think that would be better for him?
I never claimed to be an anarcho-capitalist. Like I said, these private courts are specifically something I argued about with them on this board. So why would you say something has changed in my rhetoric?
quote:
There is no justice being done here.
Do you think her billionaire backer creating a private court to hold this action, with their hand-picked judge, would help Trump?
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you think her billionaire backer creating a private court to hold this action, with their hand-picked judge
They pretty much got the same effect by commandeering the public system in an area with a brainwashed population.
We need to have sanctuary states where citizens can live in shelter from this kind of lawfare.
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:42 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
They pretty much got the same effect by commandeering the public system in an area with a brainwashed population.
OK, let me ask it again. Same question, but add, "with procedures that deny any appeal".
Again, I never claimed I was a big L Libertarian and I specifically argued this exact scenario/point with them, when they existed on this board (joshnorris, GMorgan, etc.). The only way you get "Smaller" in this respect is to eliminate public civil courts and rely on private courts to resolve civil disputes.
I don't think anyone thinks Trump could have come out ahead there.
quote:
We need to have sanctuary states where citizens can live in shelter from this kind of lawfare.
Again, this is a civil action. How do you do that and maintain your civil procedure rules?
Posted on 1/28/24 at 6:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
(joshnorris, GMorgan, etc.).
Good times, good discussions.
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know what that is, and I'm not one, so I can't really say
Sure you are. The interesting thing about you extremely low IQ Biden depends sniffers/ball washers is that you lack the ability for independent thought and self awareness. Read this slowly and often.
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:18 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
They pretty much got the same effect by commandeering the public system in an area with a brainwashed population.
We need to have sanctuary states where citizens can live in shelter from this kind of lawfare.
Or legitimate ways to change the venue. Asking some leftard judge to be fair is out of the question.
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
If the facts are on your side argue the facts
If the law is on your side argue the law
If neither the facts or law are on your side just argue
That's not how it goes, FWIW.
*ETA: or at least I've never heard it that way the 1000 times someone has said it to me
Funny that is exactly how it "goes".
Posted on 3/8/24 at 12:22 pm to Barstools
quote:
Title is wrong. They aren't related, they worked together and one was the others mentor.
So close personal friends? Is that okay?
Posted on 3/8/24 at 1:38 pm to pecxs
So I was bored and started looking up some stuff. Get this. Kaplan is a lesbian that has a wife. That wife is none other than Rachel Levine the military tranny that is in the Biden administration.
Page 10 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News