- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Canada punishes caner patients/doctors for trying Ivermectin
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:30 pm to SallysHuman
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:30 pm to SallysHuman
I get the philosophical point you’re making about MAID vs experimental treatments. My question was narrower though - is there actually a law or ruling that bans doctors from trying ivermectin for cancer in Canada? I’ve been trying to track down the specific statute or court case referenced in the tweet.
2
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:31 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
is there actually a law or ruling that bans doctors from trying ivermectin for cancer in Canada?
Is there a law against it here? I don't think so. But if you listen to user Penrod tell it doctors seem to think it's dangerous for some reason or another. And they also refused to prescribe it off label during the COVID scare.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:32 pm to Penrod
None of that appeared in a text.
Maybe your Facebook gramps.
Maybe your Facebook gramps.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:34 pm to AlterEd
It's not illegal anyplace here afaik (there are lots of jurisdictions, though), but he said, "BREAKING NEWS: Helping Cancer patients is now ILLEGAL in Canada, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith punishes over 9000 Cancer patients for exercising their "Right to Try" with Ivermectin.
Is there a new law or ruling?
Is there a new law or ruling?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:34 pm to Dee_oh_Dee
quote:
None of that appeared in a text.
Yeah, I think it is an outright lie. "As you know." As if that oncologist talks to his uncle about his patients personal information daily.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:34 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
My question was narrower though - is there actually a law or ruling that bans doctors from trying ivermectin for cancer in Canada? I’ve been trying to track down the specific statute or court case referenced in the tweet.
I het you can find it faster than I can, I'll give it a whirl though... I'm assuming since the SAP isn't any kind of "right" that the rejection of unproven treatments don't necessarily make the news. Anywho, lemme go google- already one premise of the OP has been "debunked", in that Canada does not, in fact, have ANY right to try.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:38 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Is there a new law or ruling?
Here's a quick search return.. it is basically illegal outside of a small number of trials.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:43 pm to SallysHuman
Thanks and that matches what I'm seeing. It looks like there as here off-label prescribing itself isn’t illegal in Canada (doctors can prescribe approved drugs for other uses. The restrictions seem to be more about advertising or selling drugs with unsupported claims. I’m still trying to track down the specific law or ruling the tweet was referring to.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:44 pm to SallysHuman
They're more than happy to kill you though. 
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:45 pm to AlterEd
quote:
The pretend lawyer was pretending he was a doctor in that thread. As if he had any fricking clue as to what he was speaking on.
are you a doctor?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:47 pm to AlterEd
quote:
They're more than happy to kill you though.
That they are. Tightfisting ivermectin while handing out quick turn around euthanasia orders is disgusting.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:49 pm to TigerDoc
Don't you dare promote or sell it though. If you do they'll frickin SWAT your arse.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:50 pm to Night Vision
frick that. come to the US to buy it, I’d swim the f rio grande for treatment before I let some frick politician determine my treatment. frick these assholes and let me guess let get major donations from the cancer lobby.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 2:54 pm to beaux duke
quote:
are you a doctor?
No, and I don't pretend to be one either.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 4:21 pm to Dee_oh_Dee
quote:
None of that appeared in a text.
Maybe your Facebook gramps.
Okay. It’s amazing how irrational and angry some get when their conspiracies meet reality.
Posted on 3/13/26 at 4:32 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Show this to your dumbass nephew. Maybe he will actually save someone's life.
He is rad onc, not oncology, so I doubt that would fall under his scope.
I read the abstract of the study and the introduction and conclusion. Nowhere did it address what I challenged, which was…
quote:
If you say it is a lie can you link the studies that show how Ivermecton, added to normal cancer protocols, affects patient side effects?
Dumbass!
Posted on 3/13/26 at 4:34 pm to beaux duke
quote:
are you a doctor?
Excellent point. Only professionals in the field should opine regarding that field, right?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 4:38 pm to AlterEd
quote:
anti-parasitics don't fight cancer.
Did anyone make the argument that cancer is indeed a parasite?
Posted on 3/13/26 at 4:49 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Excellent point. Only professionals in the field should opine regarding that field, right?
who said that? link?
i'm laughing at the guy posting all kinds of nutjob medical reports he doesn't understand and then accusing others of same
if only professionals could opine on topics the internets would grind to a halt
try not to be so angry on a friday spring afternoon. get some sun
Posted on 3/13/26 at 4:55 pm to BrianKellysbuyout
quote:
Did anyone make the argument that cancer is indeed a parasite?
No, but it sure seems to behave like one. Apparently it adapts and evolves to become resistant to chemotherapy and anti-parasitics kill it.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News