Started By
Message
locked post

Can we at least all agree that ar-15s have to go

Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:51 am
Posted by Pbhog
Pine bluff, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2015
3460 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:51 am
The gun has no other purpose then shooting people. It has been used in the last 3 mass shootings. No reason for a civilian to own one.
Posted by rooster108bm
Member since Nov 2010
2890 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:52 am to
It would be better if you go.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71411 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:52 am to
No.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53004 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:52 am to
Especially when you add on dangerous exploding bullets, high capacity banana clips, and God forbid, bump stocks.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
19359 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:52 am to
quote:

No reason for a civilian to own one


No reason other than, you know, rights and all that.
Posted by Pbhog
Pine bluff, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2015
3460 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:53 am to
Nice comeback. How long it take you to come up with that?
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37526 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:53 am to
Shall not be infringed mother fricker.
Posted by Michael Hayes
Member since Mar 2014
1391 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:53 am to
Bullshite....go menstruate somewhere else.
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 6:55 am
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
19523 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:54 am to
I own two. Come take them.
Posted by Pbhog
Pine bluff, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2015
3460 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:54 am to
First three words in the second amendment is a well regulated.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:54 am to
Can we agree that the First Amendment should not apply to the internet? No purpose other than offending and hurting innocent people.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32482 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:54 am to
quote:

The gun has no other purpose then shooting people. It has been used in the last 3 mass shootings. No reason for a civilian to own one.





You are right.


Won't matter here. No debate can be had on gun laws.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71411 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:55 am to
Handguns have no purpose other than shooting people. If that is chosen as a weapon to use against unarmed civilians in a gun free zone, you will start arguing there is no reason for a civilian to own one of those either.

Freedom is a great and terrible thing at the same time. You want to punish tens of millions of responsible gun owners because the acts of a few.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:55 am to
Explain how the reasoning behind bestowing a right is a limitation on said right. I’ll wait.
Posted by Pbhog
Pine bluff, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2015
3460 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:56 am to
True, everybody is brainwashed on here. I enjoy busting the breitbert/Fox News bubble these right wingers have built around themselves though.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71411 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:56 am to
quote:

First three words in the second amendment is a well regulated.



the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:57 am to
quote:

The gun has no other purpose then shooting people

i don't have an "AR" but i have a semi-auto .223/556 rifle

i use it for hunting
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422561 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Can we agree that the First Amendment should not apply to the internet? No purpose other than offending and hurting innocent people.

i guess i need to bump my thread again
Posted by Pbhog
Pine bluff, Arkansas
Member since Oct 2015
3460 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:58 am to
Forgot the first phrase in the second amendment “a well regulated militia”
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:58 am to
quote:

Pbhog


My sweet summer child
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram