re: Can we all agree nothing in that memo "threatened national security"?

quote:

---

Can we all agree nothing in that memo "threatened national security"?

---

They threw away this talking point by lunch today.

Now they’ve moved on to “its disputed.”

So if I'm calling for people to be executed, am I overreacting?

It is very much corroboration of information that has been rumored for the past year, as well as some mini bombs on the more outrageous theories (E.g. the FBI knew the information was false, used it in the FISA app, and intentionally withheld that from the court).

It's threatening to national security only in the sense that it confirms that those at the top charged with protecting us are known corrupt partisans that intended to undermine our democratic election process. But I doubt that's what they meant by their prior warnings.

quote:

---

Either way: the release of classified info in this sort of willy nilly fashion (like the president didn't even read it before making his decision) is terrible way of doing business.

---

How do you fall for this, after learning that the media and Dem reasoning behind not realeasing it was bullshite?

I don’t get it, I really don’t.

Agreed

yeah I didn't see anything that even remotely could be deemed a threat to national security

quote:

---

When Isikoff was at NBC he had a researcher named Taylor Sears. Guess where Sears was working during this time period.


Fusion F'ing GPS

---

Hmmm

quote:

---

yeah I didn't see anything that even remotely could be deemed a threat to national security

---

I hope you remember this the next time we point out that "sources familiar with the thinking of another source who knows" is a shitty way to report.

I also hope you remember this the next time people want to pretend that the FBI and the IC are fair minded when it comes to public information.