- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Can someone please explain to me this border thing.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:18 am
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:18 am
All you hear is there's so many and resources are strained and we need federal help. Here's an idea, don't let them in the country. Enforce the laws already on the books. It's a pretty simple fix.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:21 am to RoosterCogburn585

This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 7:36 am
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:21 am to RoosterCogburn585
You should know by now our government doesn’t use logic.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:21 am to RoosterCogburn585
“Calhoun say ‘HE DON’T WANT THAT BALL!!!’”
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:27 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
don't let them in the country. Enforce the laws already on the books.
The "laws on the books" force us to let them in and process for asylum if they claim it. That's the issue.
Why Remain in Mexico was such a smart and good policy.
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 7:28 am
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:31 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The "laws on the books" force us to let them in and process for asylum if they claim it. That's the issue.
When did Congress vote for this?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The "laws on the books" force us to let them in and process for asylum if they claim it.
so we have laws without limits. Interesting.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:34 am to SlowFlowPro
Pretty sure the law on the books requires them to "seek asylum" in the first countrie's border they cross. For the vast majority of these illegal's, the United States isn't the first country.
Also, if we are just supposed to take them all in for asylum, what exactly is the point of the US and Mexico being two separate countries?
Also, if we are just supposed to take them all in for asylum, what exactly is the point of the US and Mexico being two separate countries?
This post was edited on 12/30/23 at 7:36 am
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:35 am to Kattail
quote:
When did Congress vote for this?
It's a treaty, which the US ratified on November 1, 1968, per Google. It's part 28 of the Geneva Convention.
Per Bard:
quote:
Harry Truman did not sign the 1951 Convention because he felt it infringed on U.S. sovereignty. Lyndon Johnson reversed course and signed the Protocol in 1968, and the Senate ratified it
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:38 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
Pretty sure the law on the books requires them to "seek asylum" in the first countrie's border they cross.
You're wrong.
I'm pretty sure even American courts have ruled this principle isn't the law. I'm having trouble citing that because the SEO is stuck on a Biden policy being reversed by a California court.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:40 am to SlowFlowPro
You're SURE I'm wrong, but you are only PRETTY sure of why, hahah?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:44 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
Cash-strapped California will ring in the new year by offering free health care to all undocumented immigrants who qualify for the state’s government-run health insurance program.
The state, which faces a $68 billion deficit in the next fiscal year, has been steadily expanding access to its Medi-Cal health insurance program for low-income residents, allowing undocumented children to qualify for the taxpayer-funded program in 2015, then expanding it under Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom to cover undocumented adults between the ages of 19-25 and those over 50.
LINK
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:44 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
Pretty sure the law on the books requires them to "seek asylum" i
Strange, these arent assylum seekers. Theyre criminals, the deranged, the violent.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:45 am to RoosterCogburn585
Haha. SFP working overtime to deflect from Biden, as per usual.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Lyndon Johnson
Really fricked us good baw.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:49 am to RoosterCogburn585
quote:
You're SURE I'm wrong, but you are only PRETTY sure of why, hahah?
No I know you're wrong and I know why.
I said I'm having trouble linking the cite b/c of Google/SEO. I've linked it on here before.
Here is the wording of the clause:
quote:
The Contracting States shall not impose penalties, on account of their illegal entry or presence, on refugees who, coming directly from a territory where their life or freedom was threatened in the sense of Article 1, enter or are present in their territory without authorization, provided they present themselves without delay to the authorities and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence.
Nothing requires the refugee ("refugee" in this case) to remain in that first country. Read the bold language.
We can try to send them back to the last safe country they were in prior to entering the US, BUT that requires approval from that country (which is basically what "Remain in Mexico" was and why it was legal).
I think the only countries in the Western Hemisphere to have an existing agreement are The US and Canada
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:51 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
SFP working overtime to deflect from Biden, as per usual.
Uh, what?
OP asks a question. I answer.
I even supported/defended Trump's policy on this. How is that "deflecting from Biden", exactly?

Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:52 am to RoosterCogburn585
Applying common sense is a felony in the country these days.
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:52 am to cadillacattack
Where is the money in mass immigration?
Posted on 12/30/23 at 7:52 am to themunch
quote:
Lyndon Johnson
Really fricked us good baw.
Its no coincidence that the "Great inflation" started in 1965, and manufacturing died in the early 70s.
Popular
Back to top
