Started By
Message

re: Can someone explain why we have given Ukraine over 100 Billion instead of using…

Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:54 am to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:54 am to
quote:

I'm curious as to how you think that money would be used to "help our economy". Do you think the government can do anything with our money that actually helps us (all of us, not just a certain segment) other than giving it back in tax relief?


I’ll put it this way: we were told that Trump asking for 8 billion to protect the border was way too expensive and out of line.
Posted by usehername64
Member since Oct 2022
26 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:54 am to


They're WEF puppets. Staged war for the dumb masses to usher in the great reset and keep your eyes off the vaccine genocide. Also, to siphon billions from the treasury.
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 9:55 am
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
61982 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:54 am to
I don't see anything wrong with giving the 3rd most corrupt former soviet state 100 billion. I trust that Biden is making sure it's put to good use.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
26673 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:55 am to
Because we've reached the "loot the treasury" stage of the collapse of a civilization.
Posted by shallowminded
Member since Nov 2012
3139 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:55 am to
We want Ukraine to stay out of the grasp of Russia so our fearless leader his son and multiple other politicians can wash their money in Ukraine!
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
44398 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:59 am to
quote:

That money to help our economy?




An even worse idea really. Inflation is already exponential. Don't need to drop another 100 billion on the fire. What we need is someone to CUT spending and CUT regulation.
Posted by Purplehaze
spring, tx
Member since Dec 2003
2356 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:01 am to
The year is 1938. Germany wants part of Czechoslovakia, the Sudetenland. England does not want another war. The prime minister, Neville Chamberlain not only agrees but convinces France to go along. Their is a conference in Munich. England and France agree to let Germany take over the Sudetenland. They did not bother asking Czechoslovakia's opinion and they were not in Munich. Hitler promised that all he wanted was the Sudetenland.

Ask Poland and the rest of the world how that worked out. You do not give in to a bully.

In case this was not covered in your history class, here is a 5 minute summary.

Youtube link
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
56803 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:04 am to
That moneys not going to Ukraine, lol!

That money is going to weapons manufacturers in the US that are sending weapons to Ukraine at about a 2000% markup!

They have received some money but most goes to friends of the administration. This is why they hated Trump, he had put and end to a lot of this shite!
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36062 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:07 am to
It's simple, their policy is "America Last."
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49394 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:10 am to
Start in 2011 and massive donations to the Clinton Foundation (while Clinton was SOS) from Ukraine oligarchs for favorable US foreign policy to overthrow the legitimately elected government of Ukraine.

It all starts there and it is all about elite DNC members laundering US tax money back to their families.
Posted by Putty
Member since Oct 2003
25911 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:15 am to
quote:

The quick answer is that our democratic led country is being run by morons, moronic criminals, and other wiley criminals who exploit those morons and moronic criminals.


Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49394 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Ask Poland and the rest of the world how that worked out. You do not give in to a bully.


Did Great Britain and France help overthrow the Polish government and threaten German military holdings in the decade prior?

Oh no, they didn’t.

So really not a comparable situation.
Posted by usehername64
Member since Oct 2022
26 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:25 am to
FINALLY, somebody understands my point.
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
12745 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:25 am to
because when you're funneling money into a country that is giving you kickbacks AND the media in your own country is selling the people that our economy is OK and we're not in a recession, why not keep sending? there are no checks and balances for them. there is no one holding them accountable. just us taking it up the arse asking questions, like this one, that is perfectly understandable....but why would they stop now?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:26 am to
quote:

The year is 1938. Germany wants part of Czechoslovakia, the Sudetenland. England does not want another war. The prime minister, Neville Chamberlain not only agrees but convinces France to go along. Their is a conference in Munich. England and France agree to let Germany take over the Sudetenland. They did not bother asking Czechoslovakia's opinion and they were not in Munich. Hitler promised that all he wanted was the Sudetenland.

Ask Poland and the rest of the world how that worked out. You do not give in to a bully.

In case this was not covered in your history class, here is a 5 minute summary.


This is the only argument you simpletons have. Here’s the similarities between Hitler and Putin: they were both extremely specific on what they want. Putin wants Donbas, Crimea, and for NATO to back the frick off. Hitler on the other hand went into lots and lots of detail on his endgame in this little book:



Y’all have yet to convince me that Putin is a Hitler, as despicable as Putin may be. Until then, frick no we’re not risking nuclear annihilation over fricking Donbas, a place that 90% of this board had never heard of until this year and 99% still couldn’t draw an accurate picture of the region.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40873 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:28 am to
All of the Zelensky fanboys cannot (will not, more likely) explain how this conflict is an existential threat to the United States. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union for 70+ years and it didn't affect America one iota. And present day Russia is far less powerful than in its USSR form. This conflict is just another example of how easily manipulated Americans are.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68257 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:29 am to

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

All of the Zelensky fanboys cannot (will not, more likely) explain how this conflict is an existential threat to the United States. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union for 70+ years and it didn't affect America one iota. And present day Russia is far less powerful than in its USSR form. This conflict is just another example of how easily manipulated Americans are.


Their latest retarded argument is this is the roughly the same as if Russia invaded Alaska because Alaska also once belonged to Russia. Ummmmm, the frick it is. You have to be a world class dullard to believe that.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55454 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 11:05 am to
If you watched Trump's "impeachment" trial, you would understand why we are laundering money in the Ukraine for the Biden family and the Uniparty in DC
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 12:05 pm to
Trump asked the same thing and they impeached him for it
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram