- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can someone explain to me the logic behind withholding the Epstein Files?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:51 am to texas tortilla
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:51 am to texas tortilla
Take your Candace Owens conspiracies somewhere else. That shits played out.
0
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:54 am to coop222
A lot of valid points in this thread...that no one was making a year ago before daddy told them what to think.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:57 am to coop222
Wealthy campaign donors don't want to be embarrassed. It's THAT simple
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:57 am to coop222
Only logical reason is to redact all pertinent names that are high profile?
I’d do everything in my power to prove I wasn’t in them if that were the case.
Therefore they are combing through it carefully.
But idk. Just a thought.
I’d do everything in my power to prove I wasn’t in them if that were the case.
Therefore they are combing through it carefully.
But idk. Just a thought.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 10:58 am to coop222
quote:
Can someone explain to me the logic behind withholding the Epstein Files?
It’s pretty obviously because Trump and/or his friends are implicated.
It’s also possibly because he was a CIA/Mossad asset
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 11:00 am
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:01 am to Deuces
quote:
If they release “the files” and they don’t have information that confirm your suspicions, will you believe it or continue to complain until your thoughts are confirmed?
If that were the case they would have already released them.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:01 am to Ostrich
Files on this have been released.
People still think there is some list that says, these are pedophiles.
It's ridiculous and not grounded in reality.
Some of you must be wanting the videos released so you can watch whatever child porn you think they have.
People still think there is some list that says, these are pedophiles.
It's ridiculous and not grounded in reality.
Some of you must be wanting the videos released so you can watch whatever child porn you think they have.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:02 am to LSUSlidell23
quote:
If that were the case they would have already released them.
I bet you haven't read through the files that have been released.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:03 am to coop222
It's not important anymore because daddy Trump told us not to worry about it. We've moved on to bombing Venezuelans and sending taxpayer money to Argentina
Make the Americas Great Again!
Make the Americas Great Again!
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:03 am to Ostrich
quote:
It’s pretty obviously because Trump and/or his friends are implicated.
yes, because if Trump or anyone close to him were implicated the Dems surely wouldn't have used it against him yet.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:04 am to BillysIsland
quote:
It's not important anymore because daddy Trump told us not to worry about it. We've moved on to bombing Venezuelans and sending taxpayer money to Argentina
Make the Americas Great Again!
Joe Biden was still president this year. Why didn't he release them?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:06 am to coop222
quote:
Can someone explain to me the logic behind withholding the Epstein Files?
Have you witnessed the lawfare/judicial coup waged against Trump since Jan. 20?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Charges against the guilty are worthless if they are able to be protected by the black robe firewall.
We must get CONTROL of both the House & Senate to be able to impeach these corrupt federal judges.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:07 am to dgnx6
quote:
I bet you haven't read through the files that have been released.
I have not. If nothing is in them worth looking at them releasing them shouldn't be an issue.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:10 am to Mikes My Tiger
quote:
A lot of valid points in this thread...that no one was making a year ago before daddy told them what to think.
Oh look, a moron. Good job spelling all the words correctly. I'm guessing copy and paste from wherever you got your trite talking points?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:15 am to coop222
Hillary is on the list, probably several times.
Remember it was her turn back in 2020.
So if she had won none of this would be in the public eye.
She probably went down there in order to get her hooha serviced by a teen girl and no one wants to commit suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head.
Remember it was her turn back in 2020.
So if she had won none of this would be in the public eye.
She probably went down there in order to get her hooha serviced by a teen girl and no one wants to commit suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:16 am to dgnx6
I don't remember Joe saying he would release them
Contrast that to Trump on the campaign trail, Kash, Bogino, Bondi, etc.
Hmmm.
Contrast that to Trump on the campaign trail, Kash, Bogino, Bondi, etc.
Hmmm.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:18 am to BillysIsland
quote:
Contrast that to Trump on the campaign trail
Video, please.
Not Trump responding to journalist questions on the matter. Trump being the one to bring up disclosure of Epstein stuff, unprompted.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:24 am to coop222
quote:first, what do you mean by the epstein files? do you mean files that epstein kept of all of his clients? Has there ever been any evidence other than people assuming so that he kept such files? If they did exist, what woudl make you think that such people, with massive influence in what has been shown to be a very political IC and DOJ community, would leave them available to be be revealed by an administration that looked like it was likely to do so?
Can someone explain to me the logic behind withholding the Epstein Files?
Or do you mean the case files from the government prosecution? Again, if he was some kind of CIA asset like some claim, you will never see anything about that, as that kind of involvement is going to have been sanitized from the systems in the many years of the biden admin or even the first trump admin. You had all sorts of swamp people running things in these organizations during trumps first term.
So what does that leave you with? a bunch of nothing to release and anything that might be informative has been repeatedly shut down by judicial gag orders. The idea that you are going to get some kind of revelation from some epstein documents is silly at this point
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:27 am to VoxDawg
So your point is that we should ignore his answers to the direct question?
Posted on 10/23/25 at 11:33 am to BillysIsland
No, I'm saying the "dRuMpH pRoMiSeD oN tHe cAmPaIgN tRaIl!" premise is a false one.
I absolutely believe that we will see full exposure/justice when it comes to the Epstein matter, but I am not of the opinion that it's the most important thing to come out from this DOJ. It definitely won't happen on the timeline that will satisfy the fake-MAGA NPCs who have preloaded #MuhEpstein retorts lined up for every social media post of Bondi/Kash/Bongino.
I absolutely believe that we will see full exposure/justice when it comes to the Epstein matter, but I am not of the opinion that it's the most important thing to come out from this DOJ. It definitely won't happen on the timeline that will satisfy the fake-MAGA NPCs who have preloaded #MuhEpstein retorts lined up for every social media post of Bondi/Kash/Bongino.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News