Started By
Message

re: Can any of the boards liberals explain this to me?

Posted on 8/17/22 at 12:07 pm to
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22730 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

It is a known fact. Hunter Biden is a crackhead and got his position in large part because of his connections - that doesn't mean the President should restrict foreign aid to an ally in exchange for investigating him


His “connections” are his dad, who publicly threatened to withhold US taxpayer money because of the investigations into his sons company.

Who is the big guy?

quote:

quote:should be a pretty damn clear connection between the he alleged crime and the resulting governmental action Seems pretty clear. What's murky for you?


The lack of an affidavit suggesting as much. Stealing documents is not the “crime” being investigated. If it were, they found the documents so he should have been charged. That’s not what is happening, no need to dumb it down.

quote:

you're mistaken.


And you are lying, or simply don’t understand the difference between a fact and something you believe to be true.

So if we are just arguing beliefs, I believe Joe Biden has directly benefited from his sons business dealings and has used taxpayer money to ensure those dealings are successful.
Posted by RoosterCogburn585
Member since Aug 2011
1767 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:03 pm to
I have to say I wholeheartedly agree with your beliefs
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86043 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:06 pm to
Leftists on this board:

"Ok yes Hunter is a crackhead who is on tape committing dozens of crimes and who made foreign business deals solely because people wanted access to his VP-now-POTUS father. But no, there is no reason for anyone to worry about the fact that a known and compromised criminal is hanging out on AF1 with the POTUS all the time."
Posted by RoosterCogburn585
Member since Aug 2011
1767 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:06 pm to
If Trump wins a second term, would each of the libs on the board be ok with his justice department investigating the "possible" illegal dealings of the Biden family? What about opening a new investigation into Hillary's private email server?
Posted by ArbitrageSupreme45
Member since Aug 2022
13 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

"Ok yes Hunter is a crackhead who is on tape committing dozens of crimes and who made foreign business deals solely because people wanted access to his VP-now-POTUS father. But no, there is no reason for anyone to worry about the fact that a known and compromised criminal is hanging out on AF1 with the POTUS all the time."



So punish Hunter then? I'm confused at your point.

The DoJ is investigating Hunter and if Hunter is guilty, he should be punished. Similarly, the DoJ should investigate if Trump is guilty.

How exactly does this support your point in any aspect?

Posted by RoosterCogburn585
Member since Aug 2011
1767 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:10 pm to
Because trump was impeached at the very mention of investigating a political rivals son
Posted by ArbitrageSupreme45
Member since Aug 2022
13 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Because trump was impeached at the very mention of investigating a political rivals son


No he wasn't.

He was impeached because of the quid-pro-quo.

If he had instructed the DoJ to investigate (with independence), he wouldn't have been impeached.

Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Trump wins a second term, would each of the libs on the board be ok with his justice department investigating the "possible" illegal dealings of the Biden family? What about opening a new investigation into Hillary's private email server?







1. I expected Mrs Clinton to be indicted for her server stuff long before she was selected by the unelected delegates who get a vote because they are mayor of tupelo ms.
so go for it.

2. follow the law for biden case.

of course if you are honest and you saw the j6 time line you know trump is guilty of seditious conspiracy so your scenario can manifest with another president.

if Hunter is guilty fine.
biden too.
sure.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85994 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

hunter biden is a relative of the potus.


The deals were when his father was in the White House. Joe was involved.

Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85994 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

of course if you are honest and you saw the j6 time line you know trump is guilty of seditious conspiracy so your scenario can manifest with another president.


Kavanaugh.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85994 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

The DoJ is investigating Hunter and if Hunter is guilty, he should be punished. Similarly, the DoJ should investigate if Trump is guilty.


You think a crackhead got a job with a Ukrainian energy company while his father was in the White House all in his own?

Joe Biden said he didn’t know anything about his sons business dealings but recordings say otherwise.
This post was edited on 8/17/22 at 1:34 pm
Posted by ArbitrageSupreme45
Member since Aug 2022
13 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

You think a crackhead got a job with a Ukrainian energy company while his father was in the White House all in his own?



Isn't this the point of *investigating*?

Much like the DoJ is investigating Trump, there is an investigation into Hunter Biden currently open.

quote:

You think a crackhead got a job with a Ukrainian energy company while his father was in the White House all in his own?


This is the point of investigating. It shouldn't matter what I *think* because investigations aren't about what I personally think.

Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88715 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

He was impeached because of the quid-pro-quo.

What quid pro quo?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88715 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

1. I expected Mrs Clinton to be indicted for her server stuff long before she was selected by the unelected delegates who get a vote because they are mayor of tupelo ms.
so go for it.

2. follow the law for biden case.

of course if you are honest and you saw the j6 time line you know trump is guilty of seditious conspiracy so your scenario can manifest with another president.

if Hunter is guilty fine.
biden too.
sure.


How do you reconcile the "10% for the big guy?"
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

This didn’t happen


In the real world it did.

quote:

Which documents, specifically?


Specifically the ones listed on the search warrant property receipt from last week.

Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85994 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

This is the point of investigating. It shouldn't matter what I *think* because investigations aren't about what I personally think.


This question was posed to you because you seem to *think* that this has nothing to do with Joe Biden.
Posted by thotpocket
Dana Point, CA
Member since Sep 2017
2600 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

BamaAtl


Posted by russellvillehog
Member since Apr 2016
9746 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 1:56 pm to
BIDEN HAD NOT EVEN DECLARED WHEN TRUMP STARTED LOOKING INTO HUNTER!!! HE ONLY DECLARED AFTER IT CAME OUT!!

Trump was not going after a political opponent! he was looking into what was turned in to the fbi from the lap top! this was done before the election, and biden was not even being pumped at the time!
Posted by ArbitrageSupreme45
Member since Aug 2022
13 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

This question was posed to you because you seem to *think* that this has nothing to do with Joe Biden.


I've got no idea and I've not claimed otherwise.

It's why I said the issue should be investigated - and the issue is currently being investigated by the Delaware attorney general. That's the whole point of an investigation.

LINK
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22730 posts
Posted on 8/17/22 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

So punish Hunter then? I'm confused at your point.


The point is in the OP. Trump got impeached for suggesting to the president of the country that these crimes were committed in to investigate the crimes.

Hunter has been being “investigated” but the US DOJ and FBI for years, and he just took a vacation courtesy of the US taxpayer on AF1, while the same bodies just raided trumps home. FBI covered up the laptop with this info before 2020 election.

Trump got impeached, nothing happened to Hunter or his father. There is indeed something to see here.

And just throwing it out there, Trump won’t be getting in any real trouble for anything to do with the raid. We all know this, and that is the essence of the outrage. and whatever Hunter did, Joe was also involved in. We all know this
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram