- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can any leftists actually defend the nature of this 01/06 committee?
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:32 pm to TS1926
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:32 pm to TS1926
quote:
Here you go. Here's how most Americans feel about your "insurrection".
Daily Wire LINK
It's a Rasmussen poll (and I called it before I even clicked the link).
They're notoriously bad at polling because they massage their data to suit their narrative.
It's so predictable at this point. In the polling industry, Rasmussen isn't considered reliable at all.
Give me a YouGov poll or something from a more reliable polling firm, not Rasmussen.
2
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:37 pm to nonu121
No one cares about this except you loons.
Every current and former LEO I know thinks this is a charade.
One of your star ‘witnesses’ is fricking BLM/ANTIFA riot sympathizer.
Every current and former LEO I know thinks this is a charade.
One of your star ‘witnesses’ is fricking BLM/ANTIFA riot sympathizer.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:38 pm to nonu121
Where's the committee for the Women's attack on the capital?
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:43 pm to burger bearcat
obviously you choose to ignore that three republicans who were offered as good for our requirements were withdrawn after Pelosi said jordan and another were not welcome.
you also ignore republicans cheney and kinsinger.
they are brave and honorable
your petty post misses the mark a mile.
pay attention to cheney.
shes the heroic figure defending the truth.
you also ignore republicans cheney and kinsinger.
they are brave and honorable
your petty post misses the mark a mile.
pay attention to cheney.
shes the heroic figure defending the truth.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:53 pm to CelticDog
quote:
obviously you choose to ignore that three republicans who were offered as good for our requirements were withdrawn after Pelosi said jordan and another were not welcome.
You ignore the concept of the house of representatives that it is there to represent the voices of the people who elect said representatives. I can goddam assure you that Pelosi hand-picking the pub reps to participate would not be representative of the overwhelming majority of republicans.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 8:54 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
There was a truly bipartisan committee offered that Republicans sabotaged. The current committee is bipartisan and the only reason there aren't 6 Republicans on it is because McCarthy is playing games.
As usual, you’re wrong! The R’s wanted a no holds barred investigation and the Dims said screw that, you’ll find out we set this bitch up. Lol!
Posted on 7/28/21 at 9:33 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
There was a truly bipartisan committee offered that Republicans sabotaged.
No, there wasn’t, jackass.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 9:34 pm to the808bass
Except there was. It’s been covered here extensively. Please keep up.
quote:
The bipartisan commission would include 10 members. House and Senate leaders for the Democratic Party would appoint the commission chair and four other members, while the Republican leaders would appoint the vice chair and four other members.
quote:
But just issuing a subpoena would face a hurdle. The bill states that the commission can issue subpoenas if the chair and vice chair agree, or by a vote by the majority of the commission. The majority requirement for a subpoena could mean that Republican appointees would be able to block a subpoena to Trump, said Mark Osler, a law professor at the University of St. Thomas.
This post was edited on 7/28/21 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 7/28/21 at 9:41 pm to boosiebadazz
And then Pelosi rejected two of the people submitted. Super bipartisan
Shut up and sell that shite to someone who’s not paying attention.
Shut up and sell that shite to someone who’s not paying attention.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 9:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
And then Pelosi rejected two of the people submitted. Super bipartisan
Shut up and sell that shite to someone who’s not paying attention.
you just showed your hand. Either pay actual attention or shut the frick up. I’m talking about the commission that the GOP voted down after Trump told them to. You’re talking about a House committee that came about after. I literally linked you to the thread laying out the structure of the commission.
The GOP and Trump sabotaged a truly nonpartisan commission and now want to criticize the House committee that came about in its place.
But your basic ignorance of current events, parliamentary procedure and lack of “paying attention” is noted
This post was edited on 7/28/21 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 7/28/21 at 9:55 pm to boosiebadazz
frick your mom.
Posted on 7/28/21 at 10:09 pm to the808bass
quote:
frick your mom.
and all these years when we squabbled I thought it was from a place of intellectual equality yet simple disagreement. Little did I know you were just so ignorant of simple, basic facts regarding current events and that’s what drove your misguided worldview. I feel so justified in now putting you in the “not worthy of response” pile. This exchange is so great I think I’ll even bookmark it
This post was edited on 7/28/21 at 10:43 pm
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News