- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:39 am to Ingeniero
If you would put more research into your posts, we would not have to correct you.
1- Pork isn't up DUE TO TARIFFS. In California.. It's Prop 12. farmers have to implement costly construction of compliant housing — estimated to cost $3,400 to $4,000 per sow.
2- Pork supplies are low due to slower hog slaughter rates, reduced dressed weights, a smaller breeding herd, and lower productivity per litter.
3- The USDA ‘Hogs and Pigs’ report noted that supplies later in the summer and into the fall may start to trend above year ago levels. If true, this should help temper prices as supply seasonally start to improve.
In the very near term, however, pork supply remains limited and it is likely to decline further into July as hog carcass weights seasonally decline.
Hey.. BUT ALLL THOSE TARIFFS ON PIGS!
Do better.
1- Pork isn't up DUE TO TARIFFS. In California.. It's Prop 12. farmers have to implement costly construction of compliant housing — estimated to cost $3,400 to $4,000 per sow.
2- Pork supplies are low due to slower hog slaughter rates, reduced dressed weights, a smaller breeding herd, and lower productivity per litter.
3- The USDA ‘Hogs and Pigs’ report noted that supplies later in the summer and into the fall may start to trend above year ago levels. If true, this should help temper prices as supply seasonally start to improve.
In the very near term, however, pork supply remains limited and it is likely to decline further into July as hog carcass weights seasonally decline.
Hey.. BUT ALLL THOSE TARIFFS ON PIGS!
Do better.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:39 am to Gusoline
quote:Please inform me how much you think these steel factory jobs would pay american workers
Well shite lets just keep millions of jobs over seas so yall can pay $1.25 for chicken noodle soup instead of $1.50.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:40 am to Ingeniero
Broadly applied tariffs are only for the economically illiterate. It’s futile to even try to have a conversation with most of their supporters. They don’t want the facts. They hide their heads in the sand.
The restructuring of the domestic supply and manufacturing chain will be closer to a third-world (carve outs, lobbyists, corruption, limited options) than some 1950s throwback utopia.
The restructuring of the domestic supply and manufacturing chain will be closer to a third-world (carve outs, lobbyists, corruption, limited options) than some 1950s throwback utopia.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:41 am to BCreed1
Thanks.
That was my initial thought, per my post above.
This is a clear example of the author of the piece trying to fool his readers.
That was my initial thought, per my post above.
This is a clear example of the author of the piece trying to fool his readers.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:42 am to Harry Caray
You have never lived a day in your life without tariffs. Not a single frickin day
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:42 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Home Depot said a week or two ago they were probably going to have price increases, too.
Sounds like we still have too much money in the system.
Prices are always impacted by consumer demand, supply of goods and the supply of money.
Home Depot will find the proper pricing point to maintain profits, market equilibrium. Too high and not enough volume gets sold. Too low and not enough profit.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:43 am to BCreed1
quote:Ok semantic man, "retaliatory tariffs" ain't a modern solution
You have never lived a day in your life without tariffs. Not a single frickin day
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:44 am to Ingeniero
quote:Exactly. I have a 100% trade deficit with grocery store. Clearly I've been getting ripped off for decades.
Everyone knows unless you can be literally 100% self-sufficient, someone is ripping you off.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:44 am to Harry Caray
quote:
"retaliatory tariffs" ain't a modern solution
What about reciprocal tariffs?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:46 am to JimEverett
The only reason the OP posted this was as a gotcha to another thread he was in.
Like I told the other poster here. Nobody living in the USA has ever spent a day..a minute of their lives without tariffs in place. But due to Trump, it's an evil thing now.
Like I told the other poster here. Nobody living in the USA has ever spent a day..a minute of their lives without tariffs in place. But due to Trump, it's an evil thing now.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:47 am to BCreed1
quote:Good thing Tariffs are % rates instead of a binary action. Can you dig into the % rate comparison for me since you're the tariff expert?
Nobody living in the USA has ever spent a day..a minute of their lives without tariffs in place.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:48 am to BCreed1
quote:
But due to Trump, it's an evil thing now.
What histrionics.
It's economically inefficient and overall bad for our economy/SOL. Not "evil".
And your other argument about "never spending a minute of our lives without tariffs" ignores this question: has Trump increased or decreased them in our lives since January 1, 2025?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:48 am to Harry Caray
quote:
Ok semantic man, "retaliatory tariffs" ain't a modern solution
You have never lived a day in your life without RETALIATORY TARIFFS either.
Like I said from the beginning... the markets will change and adapt. Just like you are not missing your money on the products you purchased over the past 40 years.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:48 am to Ingeniero
This a great way to tax those who are otherwise not paying federal taxes.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:50 am to BCreed1
quote:Nah. Biden's carry over and boosting of Trump 1.0's tariffs was stupid too. Who did you vote for?
. But due to Trump, it's an evil thing now.
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:51 am to Ingeniero
As nice as it would be for the US, it's not possible for any country to run permanent large trade deficits. Depending on the monetary system, the end result would be either running out of money or destroying the local currency. Since Congress will not take any action to help put America on a self-sufficient footing, tariffs are our best remaining option to avoid economic collapse.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:52 am to BCreed1
quote:What were our tariff rates in the 30 previous years vs. what's going into effect now? I want to see how similar they are.
You have never lived a day in your life without RETALIATORY TARIFFS either.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:54 am to Harry Caray
quote:
Can you dig into the % rate comparison for me since you're the tariff expert?
It's not hard at all.
1- The producer of a product make "X" in profit.
2- the importer gives the producer access to the highest purchasing power in the world. Our consumers.
3- The importer does this for a profit. and that is added into the the price the consumer pays.
4- When the cost of making it does not increase, but a tariff is added, they have room to absorb it. They make deals with the importers to share that.
5- This results in the same pricing points for the consumer and the producer and importer still make a profit.
6- taxes on people are lowered and they buy more.
There is no company that has access to the US consumer going to put themselves out of business by jacking up prices to the ones they are selling to. BUT if they do, another business will gladly step in and take their share of the market.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 9:54 am to BCreed1
You sure said a lot without saying what our tariff rates were before 2025
Popular
Back to top


1






