Started By
Message

California lawmakers want corporations to disclose ties to slavery

Posted on 8/24/26 at 1:57 pm
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4291 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 1:57 pm
can you say "shakedown"?

California lawmakers want corporations to disclose ties to slavery despite uncertain future for reparations


The Truth in Disclosure Act targets companies with over $100M in annual receipts across insurance, banking and railroads



California State Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer told Fox News Digital he wants the reparations proposal to be a roadmap for the rest of the country.

While the future of reparations in California remains uncertain, state lawmakers are continuing to push forward with related legislation despite a lack of clear consensus on broad direct cash payouts.

Most recently, Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, D-Ladera Heights, introduced Assembly Bill 2599, known as the Truth in Disclosure Act. The bill would require major corporations doing business in California with annual worldwide gross receipts over $100 million to review their historical records and submit sworn affidavits disclosing any past ties to chattel slavery.

If signed into law, AB 2599 would mandate that the California Civil Rights Department establish a digital public platform by Jan. 3, 2028, to archive disclosures on corporate historical ties to slavery. The measure focuses on sectors historically tied to the antebellum economy, including insurance, banking, tobacco, cotton, sugar, railroads and shipping.

"The Truth in Disclosure Act requires any company doing business in California with annual worldwide gross receipts of over $100 million to verify and search their records for any transactions related to wealth gained during chattel slavery and report that wealth to the state to be held in a digital archive," Bryan said.



The legislation was advanced by the Senate Appropriations Committee in August as part of the legislative "suspense file" clearing process, sending it to the full Senate floor. If passed and signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, California would become the first state to require major private corporations to report under oath their historical or financial ties to chattel slavery.

LINK
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
3299 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:00 pm to
California is about 20-25 years ahead of most of the nation, it’s a precursor for what is to come. There are too many voters who simply do not care
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19990 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:02 pm to
These lawmakers need to start being sued along with the State, maybe then they will get the message.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
34813 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:03 pm to
So California is about to lose more businesses?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60280 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:04 pm to
Just when you think California can't frick itself any harder, it pulls out an even bigger dildo.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
92664 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:05 pm to
Push legislation that every citizen needs to produce proof of being from slave ancestry.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
20054 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:07 pm to
Since most companies haven’t been around 161yeats only Muslim companies will be affected.Ot if mine had I would say prove it. The Yankees burned out business records.
Posted by DeafVallyBatnR
Member since Sep 2004
19075 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:07 pm to
Do a research of all those politicians family history. Let's see who had close ties to Mao, to Dictatorship/Cartels in Mexico and for the grand prize. Who have families who owned slaves.

Open Pandoras box you must live with it too.
Posted by BCvol
Member since Jan 2022
781 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:09 pm to
They are about to lose some railroad service to go along with the billionaires
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
2928 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:09 pm to
and what will the politicians and other usurpers in CA do with this information?

My guess it will be used to demand compensation for reparations....

The left is loony.... and will destroy what remains of this nation
Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
4576 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

The Truth in Disclosure Act requires any company doing business in California with annual worldwide gross receipts of over $100 million to verify and search their records for any transactions related to wealth gained during chattel slavery and report that wealth to the state to be held in a digital archive," Bryan said.


Step 1: Find the most generous, far-left definition of "slavery" imaginable
Step 2: Flood the system with bullshite
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
36599 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:15 pm to
Very few companies exist that were operating in 1865, even fewer with $100 million in receipts.

And what qualifies as the "same company"?

With acquisitions, buyouts, name changes, etc., it's hard to even determine what is the original company and what is its connection to today.

Narrow it down to just $100 million companies and the number drops even lower. This is just a publicity stunt.

And slavery was legal, so that makes it even dumber.
Posted by BCvol
Member since Jan 2022
781 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:21 pm to
They will go after the rail road companies using track that had any slaves constructing track
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
18155 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

The bill would require major corporations doing business in California with annual worldwide gross receipts over $100 million to review their historical records and submit sworn affidavits disclosing any past ties to chattel slavery.


Or what?
Posted by MasterDigger
Member since Nov 2019
3174 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Ex post facto is a Latin term meaning "from a thing done afterward" or retroactively. In a general sense, it describes laws, decisions, or explanations formulated after an event has occurred.

In legal contexts, an ex post facto law is a statute that retroactively alters the legal consequences of actions committed before the law was enacted. Specifically, it is prohibited in the United States under Article I, Sections 9 and 10 of the Constitution, which ban laws that:

Criminalize conduct that was legal when performed.
Increase the punishment for a crime after it was committed.
Alter rules of evidence or procedure to disadvantage the accused regarding past acts.



Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
12536 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:27 pm to
How about "no"?
Posted by Swamp Angel
West Georgia Chicken Farm Territory
Member since Jul 2004
10506 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:27 pm to
I reckon now Wal~Mart, Target, and pretty much all the other major retailers are gonna have to 'fess up to selling goods manufactured by slave labor in China now, right?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
67755 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

California is about 20-25 years ahead of most of the nation


You've got this backwards.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26545 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:29 pm to
Does the Government also have to disclose their ties to slavery, because...um...
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
23421 posts
Posted on 8/24/26 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

California lawmakers want corporations to disclose ties to slavery despite uncertain future for reparations


So are they concerned about something more recent like Mercedes Benz, BMW, and Audi as part of the Nazi industrial war machine? and there is more than that if you want to dig deeper
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram