Started By
Message

re: But tariffs don’t work….

Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:53 pm to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:53 pm to
quote:

Somalia
Gambia
Sierra Leone
Haiti
Burundi

All rich, right?
All have teh worlds strongest currecy, right?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472926 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

where many are predicting we may be in a war with our foe China in 2027.

Many idiots, maybe.

Look, if China was ever stupid enough to get into a war with us, it would hurt us, I'm not saying otherwise, but it would DESTROY China. China is the world's largest food importer.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

How is the cost of living going to be increased?
This too stupid to even explain. Sorry. I don't have the patience.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27609 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

You say this arguing opposite Thomas Sowell and Milton Friedman


Sowell supported Trump and Biden bragged about how "Milton Friedman isn't running the show anymore" during 2020 when he beat Trump.

How many MAGA hats you own?
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55570 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Compared to today, we were poor.


Yeah.... comparing today to the world then is more than stupid.

So again, the USA was the richest nation prior to FDR.


Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

These people have zero capacity in logic.


Didn't you push the lie that Meatball launching a campaign was illegal?
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

They look at pre FDR as poor when in fact we were the wealthiest nation and had been for a long time.

All with tariffs.
Also before email, and the internet. Let's ban those! We'll all be rich!
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55570 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

February's UE


Has nothing to do with what I stated which is this

quote:

New factories mean more, high paying jobs.


The fact that you can not grasp that is very telling.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472926 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Sowell supported Trump

Not his tariffs

LINK

quote:

Thoughts on the Trump trade war?


quote:

Oh my gosh, an utter disaster. I happen to believe that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs had more to do with setting off the great depression of the '30s than the stock market crash. Unemployment never reached double digits in any of the 12 months that followed the crash of October 1929, but it hit double digits within six months of passage of Smoot-Hawley, and stayed there for a decade.


quote:

What about the view by President Trump that other countries are ripping us off by running trade surpluses?


quote:

It's pathetic. The very phrase "trade surpluses" gives half a story. There are countries that supply mainly goods, physical goods, and there are other things like services that other countries provide, and the United States gets a lot of money from providing services. To talk about one part of the trading and ignore the other part fails to understand that money is money no matter whether it's from goods or services.

When you set off a trade war, like any other war, you have no idea how that's going to end. You're going to be blindsided by all kinds of consequences. You do not make America great again by raising the price to Americans, which is what a tariff does.
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
6847 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:57 pm to
Rolls already has at least 6,000 employees in the US.

Good union jobs
quote:

Indianapolis — The UAW has reached a groundbreaking tentative agreement with Rolls-Royce ahead of the contract’s expiration at midnight on Wednesday, February 26. This agreement follows a major rally the day prior and the escalation of a credible strike threat against the world’s second-largest manufacturer of aircraft engines.



quote:

Rolls generated £5.94bn of its revenues in North America last year, up from £4.67bn the year prior.

quote:

In recent years, Rolls has ramped up investment across its US operations, including $1bn in its Indianapolis site.

quote:

America accounts for a third of the company’s total turnover, with the US Department of Defence, Boeing and Lockheed Martin among its largest clients.

quote:

The nature of its supply chain is that many products made in the US are destined for US customers, meaning they will not be hit with export tariffs.

quote:

A Rolls spokesman said: “We have additional capacity within some of our US operations and continuously seek to explore options to ensure that our global internal supply chain is optimised for delivery to customers in the US.”

quote:

To avoid the most damaging effects of the trade war, Rolls is exploring how much production can be transferred from the targeted countries to the US, where it employs 6,000 workers across 11 sites.


LINK
LINK
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Your example is both too simplistic, and frankly ridiculous, to be taken seriously.
of course.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55570 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

In a vacuum Sowell is right but we don't live in a vacuum we live in a world where many are predicting we may be in a war with our foe China in 2027.


And on paper, communism seems great.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472926 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Yeah.... comparing today to the world then is more than stupid.

We're still at the top today, so if you compare us today v. the world, we're only grown in our spot at #1.

quote:

, the USA was the richest nation prior to FDR.


And we're the richest nation today, further from #2 than "prior to FDR"
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

Adding higher paying jobs that raises wages will help them out.
Why not just pay half of the country to dig holes, and the other half to fill them up! Pay them $100/hr. We'll be rich!

Like I said, we can just break windows and accomplish what tariffs will.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 7:59 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55570 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Also before email, and the internet. Let's ban those! We'll all be rich!


Strawman and is just straight stupid argument.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Has nothing to do with what I stated which is this
It does. You're just too simplistic to understand why (apparently). We're about 0.6% above what's considered structural minimum UE. So who is going to fill all these new jobs, at interntaionally competitive wages? It's not a complicated question.

quote:

The fact that you can not grasp that is very telling.
ironic.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27609 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Not his tariffs


And you don't support Trump, seems both sides sometimes listen to Sowell and sometimes don't.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63055 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Sowell supported Trump and Biden bragged about how "Milton Friedman isn't running the show anymore" during 2020 when he beat Trump.
I support Trump too, but not his tariffs.

Besides... Biden kept most of the Trump tariffs that actually got enacted. He rasied them in May. Who did you vote for?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
472926 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

And you don't support Trump

The biggest reason why is his leftist economics

Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
6105 posts
Posted on 3/24/25 at 8:03 pm to
-EV for admittedly most products, yes. We will never be cost effective making clothes for instance. China massively subsidizes steel production, we will never be cost effective taking them on in that regards - but we also need domestic steel production for national security. Thats worth subsidizing

We also produce a frickload of our generic meds in countries that are not friendly to the US. Again, an industry worth subsidizing because it is a national security threat

Making cars in the US is EV+
Making heavy industrial equipment is EV+

You also need to bake in that the only reason it is so cost effective to import a lot of consumer garbage is because we subsidize their mail. It costs less money to get something shipped from AliExpress to the US than from New York to California, because we subsidize mail from poor countries (which for some reason China considered)

The more goods that are made in the US, the more the numbers work out. Less transaction cost, less shipping cost, and less slippage from foreign currency conversion
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram