- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Broward County, Fla contains thousands of voters over 100.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 10:45 am to TBoy
Posted on 7/26/17 at 10:45 am to TBoy
quote:
But the idea that someone is driving around impersonating a 130 year old person to vote in their place is a bit of a stretch.
But someone who claims to be 130 is registered to vote or voted in the last election. Considering the oldest person on earth is 117 and Jamaican, what's the bigger stretch here?
I'll say it again
quote:
Notice the somewhat smart liberals are avoiding this thread.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 10:51 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
But someone who claims to be 130 is registered to vote or voted in the last election.
You just made that up, didn't you? Where did you get the information that a 130 year old person's registration registered a vote in the last election?
Posted on 7/26/17 at 10:54 am to CptBengal
quote:
has thousands of people over the age of 100 on its roll, and some as old as 130.
I hope I'm still voting R in 2117. Unfortunately I'll likely be voting D after death
This post was edited on 7/26/17 at 10:55 am
Posted on 7/26/17 at 10:55 am to Deuces
quote:
And she may also have to try to explain why Broward County, which has the highest number of Democratic voters in the state, has thousands of people over the age of 100 on its roll, and some as old as 130.
I believe the Dems are huge proponents of voter fraud. However, this in and of itself means nothing to me. Did they vote is the only stat i care about.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:03 am to TBoy
Its in the quotes on the OP. I cant open the article from work due to a firewall.
Don't be a little bitch. Let me guess. the data wasn't from the last election, right? What a bitchy little move. Considering efforts to purge dead people from the rolls prior to last election were blocked in court, that 130 year old is almost certainly still registered. but you are still a lying bitch.
Why don't you stop wasting everyone's time and say you support voter fraud, because no one else is under the delusion that dems efforts to block obvious reforms is anything more than that.
Don't be a little bitch. Let me guess. the data wasn't from the last election, right? What a bitchy little move. Considering efforts to purge dead people from the rolls prior to last election were blocked in court, that 130 year old is almost certainly still registered. but you are still a lying bitch.
Why don't you stop wasting everyone's time and say you support voter fraud, because no one else is under the delusion that dems efforts to block obvious reforms is anything more than that.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:10 am to TBoy
quote:
It takes a while for dead people to get off the voter rolls. So what? The same is true for people who move. How many of you, when you moved, notified your former residence voter registrar of your move?
bullshite.
How difficult would it be to have a program that would eliminate voter registration when someone moved? It could be based on existing data like SS# etc.
Which party would you guess would mount a "movement" to derail anything like that?
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:12 am to BamaGradinTn
quote:
The issue here, and it's a common one, is that counties are slow in terms of purging voters who have moved or have died from their rolls. I don't see the big scandal here.
Why? Are you suggesting that county officials are that lazy or incompetent?
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:22 am to Deuces
I have long advocated that every voter registration roll in the nation be scrubbed to zero and new registrations required, including photo, fingerprint, proof of citizenship, proof of residence. And new registration required on every 10th birthday increment.
Voters should be required to produce a photo ID or a fingerprint before they vote.
Voters should be required to produce a photo ID or a fingerprint before they vote.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:24 am to Dale51
There is ZERO excuse in 2017 for not having Voter ID . None. No valid argument against it.
There are so many things you cannot do without an ID that it is ridiculous to claim "voter suppression".
Show your ID at your polling site and vote. Simple.
There are so many things you cannot do without an ID that it is ridiculous to claim "voter suppression".
Show your ID at your polling site and vote. Simple.
This post was edited on 7/26/17 at 11:25 am
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:25 am to Deuces
THere are a lot of dead people on voter rolls, regardless of party affiliation.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:30 am to TBoy
This isn't a problem in states that require voter Id. Otherwise it is a huge problem subject to vote fraud that is almost impossible to catch
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:32 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
THere are a lot of dead people on voter rolls, regardless of party affiliation.
party registration doesn't matter to the fraudster. The volume is key
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:39 am to TBoy
quote:I did.
How many of you, when you moved, notified your former residence voter registrar of your move?
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:41 am to TBoy
quote:
It takes a while for dead people to get off the voter rolls.
It should be a max of 4-6 years. Not 30.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:43 am to Hawkeye95
quote:
Florida has a lot of old people. Although those over 130 likely don't exist.
ya think???
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:46 am to Vacherie Saint
So you did make it up. When you are caught lying to support your self proclaimed superiority, you then start saying "bitch" and "little bitch" as if that makes you right or credible. You are nothing.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 11:54 am to Deuces
quote:
What if these dead people are some how voting in elections? That would make it a big deal. There's been allegations of the dead voting in elections for decades, and here's the liability.
Easily preventable with valid voter ID, regardless of whether or not the dead person had been purged yet. Although it shouldn't take years, it does take time to get people purged off the rolls.
Posted on 7/26/17 at 12:01 pm to TBoy
so you admit you were trying to "be right" on an insane little technicality that you are almost certainly still wrong about since legal challenges on this purge effort were blocked. It speaks to how immensely weak your argument (or lack thereof) is.
Thats a bitch move.
You are trying to convince educated people that taking 40 years to remove a dead person from the registration rolls is reasonable, but voter IDs are unreasonable. Idiot.
Thats a bitch move.
You are trying to convince educated people that taking 40 years to remove a dead person from the registration rolls is reasonable, but voter IDs are unreasonable. Idiot.
This post was edited on 7/26/17 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 7/26/17 at 12:02 pm to Dale51
quote:
The issue here, and it's a common one, is that counties are slow in terms of purging voters who have moved or have died from their rolls. I don't see the big scandal here.
Why? Are you suggesting that county officials are that lazy or incompetent?
Try to keep up, OK? You live in Broward County, FL, and you move to Jefferson County, AL.
How does Broward find out? Are you going to call them, or is Jefferson County going to when you go to register there? And of course, you realize that different counties have different procedures.
Lazy or incompetent? Meh...not likely. How many people in a large county...especially one like Broward...do you think die or move every day? The Florida Sun-Sentinel shows 29 just today.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News