re: Breaking via the guardian: khanna/massie falsely accused 4 men of being implicated

quote:

---

They didn't just make up the names - these were names that were unredacted in the files involved in some odd sexual behavioral discussions with a convicted sex offender and pedophile participating in sexual trafficking.

They can claim not to know Epstein all day long, but this was in the files Trump released

---

Wow, you're really going to defend this even after knowing they were just used in a photo lineup? You Massie bros are zealous, I'll give you that.

So, Khanna falsely accuses innocent men and his excuse is, "well, the DOJ should have told me these redacted names were innocent." And you think that's a valid argument for Khanna putting politics above the lives of innocent people.

They were so desperate to release names and accuse the administration of improper redactions that they forgot that there were innocent people being redacted, or more likely, didn't care if innocent people were harmed. And you, a "principled conservative", defend that.

What happened to the conservative principle of innocent until proven guilty? You so badly want these people to be guilty just so you can praise Massie, a politician. You are OK with innocent people not having their name cleared just so you can still pretend that your guy was right and the other guy was wrong.

That's a very democrat way of thinking.

Ron/Massie Bots, ASSEMBLE!

quote:

---

congressmen can't be sued for anything said on the floor

---

Would be interesting if that’s contested in court when it comes to personal accusations/defamation.

quote:

---

what names did he mention?

---

I didn’t watch the press conference but Ro admitted they were just part of a lineup. You shouldn’t ever accuse someone else of being in a cult again.

Based solely on the linked Guardian article, the subject heading is inaccurate. The Guardian reports that it was Ro Khanna—not Thomas Massie—who read the names aloud on the House floor.

Additionally, the article does not quote Massie as saying that the four men were “likely incriminated” in sex crimes, as stated in Michael Tracy’s X post. Unless there is further reporting elsewhere that corroborates these claims, Tracy’s X post is misleading.

quote:

---

Get the frick out of my thread you shitgibbon

---

How dare somebody correct your lies. Go back on your meds.

quote:

---

These people (of whom I consider Massie to be a partner) would inappropriately name their own brother if they thought it would land a shot on Trump.

---

And the flip side to that coin is there are politicians who would inappropriately defend a sex trafficking operation because they think it would reflect poorly on Trump and/or the deeply embedded entities that benefited from Epstein’s intelligence operation.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

No way bat man and Meghan?

quote:

---

Toomer Deplorable

---

You are correct sir


This forum's war on Thomas Massie is one hundred percent based on lies every day