- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:26 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
And no one is arguing for him to stay here on his own merit. Return him, present him to a neutral magistrate along with the evidence on his gang ties, and argue for the removal of the hold order.
Already been done. Twice to be exact.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:29 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:Yes. The SC wants the matter examined and decided upon by the Fifth Circuit first before anymore miscreants are deported.
Am I reading that little piece in OP right that it’s temporarily until a response is given?
The OP's thread title is misleading at best and downright dishonest at worst.
That's a common practice by The Gateway Pundit. Always clickbait...
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:30 am to NIH
quote:
Yep
No. That has already been done twice.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia has repeatedly been identified as a member of MS-13 by:
- A Maryland county police gang unit
- A reliable confidential informant
- ICE officers
- An immigration judge agreed
- An appellate board agreed
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 9:31 am
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:32 am to LSURussian
quote:
That's a common practice by The Gateway Pundit.
And how is that any different than other "news" outlets?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:32 am to LSURussian
quote:
That's a common practice by The Gateway Pundit. Always clickbait...
It is also common among the usual TDS suspects posting here. This has been pointed out to them multiple times in this thread, they blew right by it. They are agenda-driven, not truth-driven.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:34 am to BCreed1
quote:Valid point.
And how is that any different than other "news" outlets?
But The Gateway Pundit was fake news before fake news became mainstream...
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:35 am to MrLSU
So if followed by the administration, does this block all deportations until settled by the 5th then eventually the SCOTUS or can they continue to deport the ciminals? If there is a stay on moving criminal illegals out of our country then we are lost and I mean LOST as a nation. Holy Saturday how do we get some relief?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:38 am to boosiebadazz
Stephen Miller's extremism will cost Trump his agenda and the midterms.
Trump has a mandate on immigration and Miller is convincing him to ignore the law... the only thing that can stop trump's agenda when they hold a trifecta is the judical branch.
all the Democrats have to do is wait out the clock, if Trump admin does due diligence, Garcia would've been deported 6 months from now and this wouldve never been a story.
Trump has a mandate on immigration and Miller is convincing him to ignore the law... the only thing that can stop trump's agenda when they hold a trifecta is the judical branch.
all the Democrats have to do is wait out the clock, if Trump admin does due diligence, Garcia would've been deported 6 months from now and this wouldve never been a story.
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 9:39 am
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:41 am to LSURussian
quote:
But The Gateway Pundit was fake news before fake news became mainstream...
MSM has been around way longer than Gateway. CNN, MSNBC...etc Those, and more, have always been fake news.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:42 am to RelicBatches86
quote:
Trump has a mandate on immigration and Miller is convincing him to ignore the law...
What law has he ignored?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:44 am to RelicBatches86
quote:
all the Democrats have to do is wait out the clock, if Trump admin does due diligence, Garcia would've been deported 6 months from now and this wouldve never been a story.
In other words, you're advocating for the Trump admin to let Dems wait out the clock.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:45 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
This. It's not the rebuke some think. It's procedural.
They are setting up the final rug pull. This country is lost, better be ready to protect what you have because when the power dynamics shift conservatives will be targeted period. Your freedoms will evaporate and the left will finally kill the country. If you think this court will protect the constitution or citizens I can see why our grandparents lost the country over the past 70 years
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Regular, moderate Americans see the ruse, hence the admin losing support.
I am quite certain the majority of Americans back the administration removing illegals with prejudice.
Hence, the election mandate
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:45 am to BCreed1
The order prohibiting removal to El Salvador and it's progeny
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The order prohibiting removal to El Salvador and it's progeny
That's not a law sir.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:47 am to Jdash13
quote:This is why we cannot put our trust in mere men, regardless of their political affiliation.
They are setting up the final rug pull. This country is lost, better be ready to protect what you have because when the power dynamics shift conservatives will be targeted period. Your freedoms will evaporate and the left will finally kill the country. If you think this court will protect the constitution or citizens I can see why our grandparents lost the country over the past 70 years
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:47 am to LSURussian
quote:
Yes. The SC wants the matter examined and decided upon by the Fifth Circuit first before anymore miscreants are deported.
The OP's thread title is misleading at best and downright dishonest at worst.
That's a common practice by The Gateway Pundit. Always clickbait...
Spot on
...and the 5th court of appeals is not going to dide with the anti Americans on this matter.
They'll rule on ot Monday.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:50 am to BCreed1
You think those semantics matter?
The first mandate the president has to to follow the rule of law. He has an immigration mandate. The only way to lose it it to act lawlessly. It’s retardedly shooting yourself in the foot.
The only saving grace is the Democrats are a rudderless, leaderless opposition party. Knowing them, they’ll find a way to work trannies and racism into this somehow.
The first mandate the president has to to follow the rule of law. He has an immigration mandate. The only way to lose it it to act lawlessly. It’s retardedly shooting yourself in the foot.
The only saving grace is the Democrats are a rudderless, leaderless opposition party. Knowing them, they’ll find a way to work trannies and racism into this somehow.
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 4/19/25 at 9:53 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
The first mandate the president has to to follow the rule of law.
That depends on how silly the judiciary is going to be. Their political activism is the reason that defying them (real or perceived) is politically acceptable.
Page 8 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News