- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Illegals
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:47 pm to Taxing Authority
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:47 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Biden did those though.
quote:
And you supported it right?
No
However, there were no consequences to his actions.
Evidently, that is the new normal.
3
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:48 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Problem is, that's false. They didn't. The mandate went into effect before they ruled.
The Supreme Court does not, in fact, operate a time machine
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The opposite is also true.
Define "the opposite"
What is the opposite of "choose NOT to enforce laws in certain situations"?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:48 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
However, there were no consequences to his actions.
Not true. He was prohibited from either action, and stopped in both instances.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:50 pm to BCreed1
quote:
What is the opposite of "choose NOT to enforce laws in certain situations"?
Lots of people are making illogical leaps doing just that
Here is one example
quote:
therefore, if the executive is not in violation of the law by using discretion to choose not to enforce laws, to which they are sworn, it seems logically....
the executive can choose, by discretion, not to enforce this judges ruling and deport him straight to El Salvador. The DOJ, who would enforce such, is a member of the executive and chooses, because of lax policies, not to enforce the judges ruling.
...which is why I said you need to define what you mean.
I need to make sure you're not making the same irrational arguments
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:51 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Irony
Which is closer to lawlessness?
1. Letting in 20 million illegal aliens in 4 years?
2. Deporting 20 million illegal aliens in 4 years?
For me, number 1 is clearly closer to lawlessness.
Why do you choose to oppose number 2?
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Supreme Court does not, in fact, operate a time machine
Wow. Riveting.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You are being a dick and you know it. It's funny watching you type as if you know more than anybody else while proving yourself an idiot.
quote:
The President deporting people outside of Congressional authority is an illegal deportation.
The president enforces the law and does not need, via the constitution, to ask their permission.
quote:
deporting a US citizen
Nobody is talking about a US Citizen.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I originally said. White flag.
Laken didn’t waive the white flag to your boy, I won’t waive to white flag either. Continue with your advocacy for the criminal invaders though.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Supreme Court does not, in fact, operate a time machine
They had plenty of time to block the mandate, and they were asked to do so.
They didn't, because they wanted to both rule the way they inevitably did while also not actually stopping the unconstitutional actions of the Biden admin.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
What is the opposite of "choose NOT to enforce laws in certain situations"?
Lots of people are making illogical leaps doing just that
It's pretty clear. So step up and answer it.
quote:
I need to make sure you're not making
LOL! Ok POPS!
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:55 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Laken didn’t waive the white flag to your boy,
Wait... is he now blaming what happened to her on her?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not true. He was prohibited from either action, and stopped in both instances.
He was not stopped in either instance.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:56 pm to BCreed1
quote:
The president enforces the law and does not need, via the constitution, to ask their permission.
He needs the permission of Congress and must act within that permission, and cannot act otherwise violating the Constitution.
quote:
Nobody is talking about a US Citizen.
I am. Why can't the President deport a US Citizen, exactly?
Because that would exceed his Congressional authority?
Because that would violate the Constitution?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:57 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
They had plenty of time to block the mandate, and they were asked to do so.
The Supreme Court doesn't get to just declare something. There is a process to get in front of the Supreme Court for a ruling.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:57 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
However, there were no consequences to his actions.
Evidently, that is the new normal.
That's clearly what these guys want.
Democrats get to destroy the country by choosing not to enforce laws.
Republicans can't fix it by choosing to enforce those laws.
Apparently we need new laws saying we can enforce the laws already on the books.
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:58 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Wait... is he now blaming what happened to her on her?
No. jimmy is attempting an emotional diversion and I told him it's a white flag and the terrible murder of LR has nothing to do with this conversation.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:59 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
He was not stopped in either instance.
When was the vaccine mandate under OSHA illegally enforced after the ruling?
When was the student loan forgiveness under HEROES Act done after the ruling?
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. jimmy is attempting an emotional diversion and I told him it's a white flag and the terrible murder of LR has nothing to do with this conversation.
Oh no. It has everything to do with it. You are advocating for stall tactics that will result in more Laken Rileys. You just don't want to admit it.
Posted on 4/19/25 at 2:59 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Republicans can't fix it by choosing to enforce those laws.
Straw man.
Republicans just need to enforce the laws within the statutory authority and Constitutional limits of the actions.
This post was edited on 4/19/25 at 3:00 pm
Page 23 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News