- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:38 am to Ag Zwin
It might have been BS, but there were reports that Iran wanted to whack Trump and Pompeo for the Soleimani killing.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:39 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
Why do these people get security details after they are out of office?
It's not so much that they get them afterwards, but rather they are allowed to KEEP them, once they leave.
Brennan says it's as a service to the country, since they may need to pick up the phone and call him to discuss national security matters that may have overlap to his time as a hack.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:39 am to John Barron
No celebrating until Fauci's is removed.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:39 am to Decatur
quote:
Should the next Democrat President revoke Trump’s secret service protection?
Clearly the same thing...
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:39 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Bunk Moreland
Can the tears stop now with Mike?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:40 am to Decatur
quote:
Should the next Democrat President revoke Trump’s secret service protection?
Did you miss when Biden did this? You dumb fricking idiot.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:40 am to VoxDawg
quote:
It's not so much that they get them afterwards, but rather they are allowed to KEEP them, once they leave.
Brennan says it's as a service to the country, since they may need to pick up the phone and call him to discuss national security matters that may have overlap to his time as a hack.
Are we talking security clearance or security detail? This sounds like the government was paying $2 million/month for bodyguards.
This post was edited on 1/23/25 at 9:41 am
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:40 am to IT_Dawg
Well this isn’t about a clearance this is about tax payers funding protection for evil non elected people
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:40 am to Decatur
quote:
So what?
Are all democrats willfully stupid? I mean, you actually have to put forth an effort to block any information to keep your brains smooth, don't you?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:40 am to Decatur
If they were complicit in obstruction or the attempts on his life....then absolutely. They can meet Satan in hell.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:41 am to Decatur
quote:
Trump could get his former administration officials killed and the Trumpkins here would cheer it on.
Pompeo is more than welcome to hire private security, just like Biden forced RFK jr. to do. But that's different, right?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:41 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
It might have been BS, but there were reports that Iran wanted to whack Trump and Pompeo for the Soleimani killing.
Member of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Charged with Plot to Murder the Former National Security Advisor (Bolton)
This post was edited on 1/23/25 at 9:42 am
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:41 am to Free888
quote:
This sounds like the government was paying $2 million/month for bodyguards.
We were.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:41 am to Decatur
quote:
So what?
That's not an answer. When was Pompeo ever president?
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:42 am to SaturatedPhat
quote:
Did you miss when Biden did this? You dumb fricking idiot.
You are trying to reason with a groomer that would jail you tomorrow if he could. I don't know why people go back and forth with them and VOR. Just two dishonest shitbags.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:43 am to John Barron
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/6/26 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:44 am to Decatur
quote:
Member of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Charged with Plot to Murder the Former National Security Advisor (Bolton)
Yet dems were on here last week saying Iran had never posed a threat to US officials. Oh, and Iran are the "good" Islamists.
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:46 am to Decatur
quote:
So what?
The discussion is revoking security clearance for past spooks, not revoking secret service protection for former presidents.
Do you think the two are the same?
Edit: never mind, my mistake. I see it’s security detail.
That is curious. I wonder why?
This post was edited on 1/23/25 at 9:49 am
Posted on 1/23/25 at 9:46 am to Decatur
quote:
Should the next Democrat President revoke Trump’s secret service protection?
You better pace yourself, dingus. It's going to be a long 4 years for you, and at this pace, you'll do a year in a padded cell, and the final 3 in the camps.
Popular
Back to top


5







