re: Breaking: Explosive law suit alleges Fox News and Trump pushed Fake News Seth Rich story

BTW, your list is not exhaustive. Where is WSJ, washington times, circa,?

quote:

---

So now the DC police are involved in this "vast" conspiracy.

hilarious

---

Money talks...you ever heard of that? Probably already mentioned, but there has been at least three, I'm thinking four people involved with the DNC/Debbie blabbermouth Schultz or the Clinton's found dead in less than a year...and not a word.

quote:

---

Why do you keep on acting like WAPO and NYT are some sort of objective papers? They are great at reporting news, but their ideological editorial bent is clearly to the left.

Why would a conservative trust wapo? nyt? These sites are left wing.

---

I don't think anywhere I claimed that any place was non-bias. The idea that non-bias can ever be achieved is this weird myth that just won't die.

But one can strive for objectivity, context, and integrity in their journalism or reporting.

The better question is, if the operating logic of conservatives is that partisanship disqualifies a place from operating with integrity, then why does that not apply to Sean Hannity, Fox News, Infowars, Brei Bart, Levin, Drudge, or The Gateway Pundit? Or is the conclusion that because the assumption is everyone is out to push a political agenda above all else, I mine as well just stick to the places that align with my biases?

Quit being a bigot and learn to argue without defaulting to "Muh foxnews"

quote:

---

It's only people the consume Fox News and probably spend little to no time whatsoever reading actual journalism that think there is some sort of equivalency between places like the NyTimes, WaPo,

---

Please tell me you're kidding. WaPo and NYT are the kings of fake news. Here's 32 examples of fake news from the MSM: LINK

And that list was compiled back in February. One could compile a list at least twice that long since then.

My bad. Should have included emoticons in my prior post. I forgot that pretty much wraps up your repertoire.

Ok, your big issue is that you fail to realize that a place is trusted/distrusted by a certain ideology based on the viewpoints the articles put out.

Go to nyt or wapo right now and most of the articles are not journalism, but rather left wing opinion pieces. That is how news makes money these days.

The reason why liberals don't trust wsj or fox is because the sites mostly contain conservative viewpoints. The reason conservatives don't trust wapo, nyt, abc is because most of the time they are left wing in their article selection.

And editorials are not journalism.

quote:

---

Please tell me you're kidding. WaPo and NYT are the kings of fake news. Here's 32 examples of fake news from the MSM: LINK

And that list was compiled back in February. One could compile a list at least twice that long since then.

---

Coming from a place that was founded not to be a journalistic outlet, but to be a conservative rebuttal to the Washington Post. Putting their ideology and forwarding it atop the mission statement of the enterprise.

That is the distinction being made here. Mistakes ALWAYS happen in journalism. That is inseparable from the profession. How they are handled tells you a lot about a place. How they occurred in the first place as well. The first one you posted for instance, Politico already corrected on its own accord and you can visit the site right now with the correction. How is Fox News handling the Seth Rich story? What does its origin and pathway tell you about them?

Most of that list is scattershot nonsense though. Where a refutation is based upon another person's opinion of the matter. Or uses the Trump administration's PR as the "proof" of something being fake. Which in and of itself exposes a severe lack of journalistic standards and does a clear disservice to the audience by asserting that an unverified assertion is interchangeable with proven matters of fact.

But it becomes clear how you all get caught up in these loops when this is what you consider to be quality reporting.

quote:

---

I bet you don't even realize what you did here...

---

Have you come up with anything of value to say yet besides damage controlling for Fox News?

Washington Post Link