Started By
Message

re: Breaking - director of the FBI is a sloppy drunk

Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:45 pm to
Posted by Speckhunter2012
Lake Charles
Member since Dec 2012
8663 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

i read articles i know i'll likely disagree with all the time


I still read the daily paper, so yeah, I see BS every day from these types and your heroes. It is called propaganda and state-controlled media and you are ok with that BS.

Like him or not, Kash is an American male who likes women, cigars and fine drink.

What exactly is the problem unless it is proven he is drinking at work?
God only knows what people like you do on your spare time.
Posted by Neutral Underground
Member since Mar 2024
3395 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:46 pm to
Pete Hegseth just won a war that you gooners were claiming was going to last forever. The only thing Pete is drunk on is GLORY and VICTORY. You pudd. There is no one in the Democrat party that could pull off what Trump and Hegseth did. Because The Democrat Crime Party is only good at stealing and corruption.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
15180 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:54 pm to
You are brainwashed
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36755 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:56 pm to
I understand some folks disgust with this organization, I acknowledge it without necessarily agreeing or disagreeing. But my question always becomes whether some amongst us, present company notwithstanding, whether some aspects and issues around the periphery of this thing have been considered. Just as a single example among probably many, consider the circumstances of a multi-state, if not fully national, perhaps even with international elements, take a child sex trafficking ring. Something like that can’t merely be investigated and prosecuted as a whole, like it should if it be most effective, no one state agency can take the lead on the entire thing for every other state. Nor would they even have the funding and resources necessary to handle something of that breadth as it would require. Enter the FBI. Something like that is squarely in its wheelhouse. And you can substitute that particular crime with many other crimes that could and would and do occur across numerous different state jurisdictions. Drugs. Terrorist cells. Fraud rings. Etc etc.

So where do those things fall once an FBI is dissolved?? That’s many an innocent victim who deserves justice, not to mention preemptive and proactive operations intended to prevent impending victimization as well. And it just can’t rationally be said that it hasn’t worked as intended and as designed in too many cases to count. There’s not corruption in every single FBI case, obviously.

So again, back to my question, where do those legitimate efforts fall if there were no longer an FBI?
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10707 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

never understood how this is supposed to be some kind of great point
i read articles i know i'll likely disagree with all the time


because you are stupid


the Atlantic has no ethics.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39698 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 8:59 pm to
Damn, and here I thought the podcaster would do a great job running the FBI
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
1990 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:01 pm to
So the Atlantic and you’ve gotten tired of embarrassing yourselves trying to portray the Iran operation as anything other than a historic success and rather than admitting what horses asses you’ve looked like have decided to pivot and look like horses asses over a new topic.

Well done good and faithful servant.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44312 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:01 pm to
I mean, this doesn’t seem bad to me:

Since being sworn in, Director Patel has taken a grand total of 17 days off — half as much time off as Comey and Wray — and he spends twice as much time in the office as either of them ever did. The so-called "intoxication incidents" The Atlantic breathlessly reports have happened exactly ZERO times. Under his tenure: 67,000 arrests nationwide. Violent crime arrests up 112%. Murder rate down 20%. 1,800 criminal gangs dismantled. 2,200+ kilos of fentanyl seized — enough to kill 178 million Americans. 300 human traffickers arrested. 6,200+ missing children recovered. 1,700 online predators arrested — a 490% increase. 8 of the Top Ten Most Wanted captured, double the previous four years combined. 1,000+ agents redeployed from DC bureaucracy back to field offices chasing criminals.
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
1990 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

You are brainwashed


You backed Swallwell until 48 hours ago.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24018 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:03 pm to
Trying to get rid of him like they are trying to get rid of Hegseth and everyone else in the administration.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39698 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:03 pm to
Damn man at least quote the mouthpiece who is spewing this nonsense if you’re gonna share the propaganda with the class
Posted by MikeFromPlaquemine
Member since Mar 2026
5 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:04 pm to
Did Jameel Hill write that? Or whatever her name is.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19352 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:09 pm to
Are these people part of the 51 experts that signed off on Hunter’s laptop
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42151 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

So where do those things fall once an FBI is dissolved??

Over 4 out of 5 cases the FBI deals with are drugs, weapons or white collar crimes. These cases can and should be dealt with by state law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies. The Founders would be aghast at the concept of a federal law enforcement apparatus, and it should be no surprise that its creator was a left-wing progressive whose great-uncle was Napoleon Bonaparte.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36755 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:19 pm to
But I specified crimes that involve multiple acts that occur in multiple states. That’s a completely different situation. Also, would federal criminal laws/regulations simply be rescinded and no longer in effect? Because state agencies don’t put together federal cases.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98240 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

She spoke with more than two dozen people with knowledge of his conduct


Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
4911 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

because you are stupid

no you are!!1!
case in point
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65870 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

You’re right. Nothing to see here


Correct.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46171 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Damn, and here I thought the podcaster would do a great job running the FBI


Ya, because that's all he has done before taking the job....just a few podcasts.

Idiot.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39698 posts
Posted on 4/17/26 at 9:53 pm to
Are you okay with unqualified sycophants running the FBI?

A simple yes or no will suffice
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram