re: Boy Crisis of 2025, Meet the ‘Boy Problem’ of the 1900s

quote:

---

Well this is a different sort of question. I'm sure quite a large number of men HAVE had casual sex. That said, the percentage of men regularly engaging in casual sex is far smaller than the percentage of women.

---

The top 5% of men are having their pick of women. The other young men are struggling finding anyone to even date. And women aren’t emotionally able to cope with the long term effects off being a whore. As was said, men get high fived for getting laid. There is still a stigma associated with loose women.

But women will continue being promiscuous with abortion and birth control readily available.

quote:

---

There’s a lot to unpack here. I don’t t think I have it in me.

---

And that’s why men need to solve the problem.

quote:

---

It seems like you’re saying casual sex is fine for men but not for women.

---

That's because regardless of whether you consider yourself a feminist or not, you have internalized feminist ideas...to the point that you're not even aware of it.

No one said "it's fine" for men to be sexually promiscuous. Both sexes are to confine sex to the context of an ordained marriage. That's the instruction.

However.

Again.

Men and women are not the same. We have complimentary tendencies and virtues.

The proper female influence tends to civilize and elevate men and inspire us to develop character and competence. The endeavor to win the hand of the woman a man loves inspires him to make something of himself, to work hard to provide for her, to develop courage and persistence and to protect her and the rest of the family. That is our assigned role, and when women do their part, that's usually what happens. It's happened more or less throughout history.

But when women give away the milk for free and there's no reason for men to earn the cow, that doesn't happen.

For their part, the woman's role is to nurture and serve the family and keep the home, and when men do their part—being faithful, providing, protecting, and loving, that's usually what happens. It's happened more or less throughout history. Women deal with the home and men deal with what's outside of and beyond the home.

Each sex is genetically and hormonally and emotionally suited to those roles.

I agree with you that feminism is the result of men not fulfilling their roles as they should have. Men dominated and took advantage of women instead of partnering with them, and I don't blame women for getting sick of it. The solution isn't for women to try to be men, however.

The solution is for men to be men like we were supposed to and women to be women like they were supposed to. In other words, both if us need to be better men and women, and we'll be fine.

Now, to your claim quoted above.

Although both sexes should be sexually chaste, it has a much greater impact on society when women seek to be promiscuous than when men do so.

Although morally there is no difference between men and women not being chaste, there is a great deal of difference to society. I trust that our current circumstances are clear enough and that I don't need to elaborate further, but I will anyway.

When the average woman is reasonably chaste and the average man is reasonably less so (which with the biological/hormonal differences between us, about as close as we're likely to get), you will have prostitutes and you will have men seeking the relatively small minority of women who are willing to compromise their morals for an affair, and fornication will happen, and it will be less than ideal.

But when the average man AND the average woman do not value chastity at all, you have the complete breakdown of the family. Even if the average man ceases to value chastity at all but the average women still does, the family survives, even if it doesn't thrive.

I will offer an analog with regard to men to hopefully make what I am saying more clear.

If lack of chastity is societally over-represented in females, then lack of courage is societally over-represented in males.

Women can be courageous just like men, but since men are so much stronger and therefore tasked with the job of defending the country and enforcing the laws (yes, I know there are female police officers...would you like for me to post some videos of females trying to subdue male perps and the perps basically laughing and walking away? The internet is full of them) a lack of courage in the average woman will not lead to a complete societal downfall. We will have trouble, because women would be scared about too many things and having emotional issues as a result, but society will not completely collapse if that happens.

On the other hand, if the average male loses courage to the point that not enough males can be enlisted in the armed forces and volunteer to enforce laws and do the dangerous jobs that are 99% done by males that maintain our infrastructure, society collapses.

Again, neither is better and neither has a moral pass to do anything. But given our different roles, there are different virtues that affect society differently when we do not uphold those virtures.

Boy crisis started in WW2 and Vietnam when a hell of a lot of the worlds alphas were killed.

quote:

---

I don’t know from experience but I assume this goes for other professional and male dominated industries like medicine, engineering and law.

---

lol @ law being male dominated

quote:

---

The top 5% of men are having their pick of women. The other young men are struggling finding anyone to even date. And women aren’t emotionally able to cope with the long term effects off being a whore. As was said, men get high fived for getting laid. There is still a stigma associated with loose women.

---

Every bit of this is spot on.

There is a segment of the female population that is between about 30 and 40 that bought into feminism hook, line, and sinker, screwed dozens if not hundreds of guys for the decade of their 20s and now that they want to get married and in some cases start a family, they can't understand why men are turned off by the fact that they have sucked a three digit number of different rods.

Compound that with the fact that women initiate 70% of divorces in 2025, the majority of which are not for abuse or neglect or addiction but just because they got bored, and the fact that no one has informed the divorce courts of the strong independence of the feminist female, so they give her half the guy's stuff and order him to pay alimony and only see his kids every other weekend and half the holidays.

So let's see:

1. There's a pretty good chance that even if you were an average woman, you'd end up hitting the "cancel" button at some point on a whim.

2. If that happens, I end up financially devastated and if we have kids I almost certainly end up without primary custody.

3. You fricked—on average—a different guy every nine days for the entire decade of your 20s.

So what are the chances you're not going to get bored here? Not very good.

Men will hit them, sure.

But they don't want to marry them, and the now ex-whores can't understand why.

quote:

---

But women will continue being promiscuous with abortion and birth control readily available.

---

Women will continue to be promiscuous as long as they continue to buy into feminism. They'd do it even if you took the birth control and abortion away.

The scientific studies back that up, by the way. There has not been a causal link established between the availability of contraceptives and increased promiscuity.

Case in point, premarital sex had already increased before the pill was widely available and abortion became legal.

It is feminism.

quote:

---

Based on… ?

---

This is well researched. If you aren't aware of this simple fact, you shouldn't even comment in threads like these.

And they're also unaware that the guy is sleeping with other women

Doesn't the average woman today have 3 or 4 times the amount of sexual partners as a man?