- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/12/26 at 10:42 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:Everything?
What did "Q" say that turned out NOT to be true?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 10:44 am to SallysHuman
quote:quote:
List?
Find me the thread, I'll parse you a list.
By now a lists of Epstein coconspirators would have been easy to put together if one of the past DOJs would have interviewed and listened to the victims criminal complains and claims.
Pam can be different this time. She could take the victim seriously and investigate the victims criminal complaints. The dower public perception currently of Pam Bondi from a lot of MAGA would flip on a dime and it would put the Democrats on the defensive, defending rapists, abusers, and pedos.
Pam should instruct her subordinates to investigate those criminal complaints. Or put together a special counsel like investigative unit to investigate these criminal complaints.
Her legacy would grown nicely in the positive direction simply because it's the right thing to do.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 10:52 am to GumboPot
quote:
She says it’s WAY darker than anyone imagined, torture emails, constant references to “consumption,” a place literally called “The Cannibal” restaurant, and code words like “jerky” and “human meat” being thrown around like it’s nothing.
Yet, not 1 name leaked… in a place that leaks like a Seive
Not 1 victim coming out and naming ppl
Posted on 2/12/26 at 10:52 am to SDVTiger
quote:
So all the ppl we have known other than Lutnik who had lucnh with his kids on the Island
And? Just because we’ve “always known” these names we dismiss the message? Shouldn’t you be asking “why haven’t they prosecuted these people since we’ve always known?”
Posted on 2/12/26 at 10:57 am to GumboPot
I want to hear it from someone in addition to Boebert. Those us who live in Colorado know she has a screw loose but she has been on her game a little bit of late.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 10:58 am to bstew3006
quote:
Not 1 victim coming out and naming ppl
The DOJ will not interview the victims, accept their criminal complaints and investigate said criminal complaints.
See the problem?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:00 am to theballguy
quote:
I want to hear it from someone in addition to Boebert.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:03 am to GumboPot
quote:
Rep. Nancy Mace says she has seen the Epstein client list and warns that the names on it will shock the entire world.
Mace likes naming names, she's done it before, she oughta do it again.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:07 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Mace likes naming names, she's done it before, she oughta do it again.
She oughta, but reposting this to demonstrate why this is not so easy (by design):
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:10 am to GumboPot
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. so trump gives this guys son a job in the federal government.Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:11 am to GumboPot
quote:
She oughta, but reposting this to demonstrate why this is not so easy (by design):
Even your snippet states the Speech and Debate provides cover.
That's literally all they have to do. Read the "names" into the record.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:12 am to SallysHuman
quote:
That's literally all they have to do. Read the "names" into the record.
There are House procedures in order to do so. Basically Mike Johnson has to allow it.
ETA: "reading the names" is a red herring. The DOJ accepting and investigating criminal complaints is the proper path and step one.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 11:17 am
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:15 am to GumboPot
quote:
There are House procedures in order to do so. Basically Mike Johnson has to allow it.
Next time one of them have the floor, start naming names. It is that easy. Maybe they get cut off.. maybe the next one can pick up where the first one left off.
It really, truly IS that easy.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:19 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Maybe they get cut off.. maybe the next one can pick up where the first one left off.
It really, truly IS that easy.
The repercussions are potential censure, sanctions, investigations and removal (see George Santos) and you are most defiantly not getting funding for your water pipeline approved.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:20 am to GumboPot
You forgot murder. That's a potential repercussion as well
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:21 am to AlterEd
quote:
You forgot murder. That's a potential repercussion as well
You are right.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:21 am to GumboPot
Lauren and others have spent years crafting the most extreme and sordid tales
it's the complete opposite of "way darker than anyone imagined"
It's failing to meet the public's expectations PRECISELY BECAUSE the Q idiots and others set absurd wild expectations regarding satanic rituals and eating infants
Hence, Q (and others) helped create the environment whereby outrage is muted for "merely" grooming and exploiting 16 year olds.
it's the complete opposite of "way darker than anyone imagined"
It's failing to meet the public's expectations PRECISELY BECAUSE the Q idiots and others set absurd wild expectations regarding satanic rituals and eating infants
Hence, Q (and others) helped create the environment whereby outrage is muted for "merely" grooming and exploiting 16 year olds.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:23 am to GumboPot
quote:
The repercussions are potential censure, sanctions, investigations and removal (see George Santos) and you are most defiantly not getting funding for your water pipeline approved.
That's not going to happen. Whoever starts spilling will be a hero to many on the left, right and center.
Santos is not even a good comparison. He did crimes. He also fabricated his background.
"The committee found he stole from his campaign, defrauded donors, lied on federal financial disclosure forms, and used campaign funds for personal expenses like luxury goods, Botox, and OnlyFans."
Comparing THAT to Mace or Boebert naming names is just ridiculous.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 11:24 am to Pettifogger
quote:
Lauren and others have spent years crafting the most extreme and sordid tales
it's the complete opposite of "way darker than anyone imagined"
It's failing to meet the public's expectations PRECISELY BECAUSE the Q idiots and others set absurd wild expectations regarding satanic rituals and eating infants
Hence, Q (and others) helped create the environment whereby outrage is muted for "merely" grooming and exploiting 16 year olds.
If I was the Trump Administration I would instruct the DOJ to accept the criminal complaints from the victims, investigate and report. In turn, that would make Boebert, Mace and Massie look like the idiots the administration wants them to be.
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News