Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Bodies of over 2,000 unborn babies found on dead abortionist’s property

Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:14 am
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
7939 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:14 am
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bodies-of-over-2000-unborn-babies-found-on-dead-abortionists-property


quote:

WILL COUNTY, Illinois, September 14, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – The bodies of 2,246 aborted babies were found in the home of a recently deceased abortionist who previously operated in 2020 Democrat contender Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s South Bend, Indiana.


quote:

“Will County Sheriff’s Detectives, Crime Scene Investigators[,] and representatives from the Will County Coroner’s Office arrived at an address in unincorporated Will County,” the sheriff’s office said in a press release. “Personnel were directed to an area of the property where 2,246 medically preserved fetal remains were located. The Will County Coroner’s Office took possession of the remains.”


Geez medical preserving for science??? or side harvesting business??
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:17 am to
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:18 am to
Thanks for pointing that out, Hank.
Posted by Hogwarts
Arkansas, USA
Member since Sep 2015
18051 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:23 am to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56495 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Thanks for pointing that out, Hank


Hank always runs defense.
Posted by Motorboat
At the camp
Member since Oct 2007
22682 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Bodies of over 2,000 unborn babies found on dead abortionist’s property


what? that's not normal?
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
16227 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:42 am to
Jeffrey dahmer was keeping body parts for medical science also, dammit.
Posted by GoldenAge
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
1523 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:54 am to
While I do find it disgusting, I do not see why it is such a big deal. This was basically trash. The mothers of these children did not want the baby, the government has okay'd the killing of the fetus because "it's not a human," but this isn't? How is it okay to kill the fetus but not keep the remains? I would think killing them would be more reprehensible than keeping the remains.
Posted by BeeFense5
Kenner
Member since Jul 2010
41292 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 8:57 am to
Was it BamaAtl’s house?
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27125 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:00 am to
quote:

I do not see why it is such a big deal.


Really? So, how many animals did you torture when you were little?
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:03 am to
quote:

I do not see why it is such a big deal


Are you actually being serious?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50468 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Previous Thread


Disgusting enough that it deserves multiple threads, imo.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50468 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:05 am to
quote:

This was basically dead babies.


FIFY

quote:

I would think killing them would be more reprehensible than keeping the remains.


Both are reprehensible.
Posted by GoldenAge
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
1523 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:06 am to
Why not actually refute my opinion? Why would someone who doesn't believe the fetus is alive care what happens to the remains of it? The life of the fetus is more important to me than the carcass, but maybe not to you.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27125 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:10 am to
quote:

The life of the fetus is more important to me than the carcass


Does not equal "I do not see this as such a big deal."

Your "opinion" with that statement was so fricking absurd that it really did not warrant refuting...
Posted by GoldenAge
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
1523 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:15 am to
In a perfect world, this wouldn't happen. But why is it okay to kill the fetus but not keep the remains? If the carrier of the fetus did not want it, why does the carrier or people who okay'd abortion, care what happens to it? You can snip words around to try and fit your line of thinking, but yet have not provided any substantive answer. SO MAJ, answer the fricking question. Why is it okay to kill the fetus but not okay to dispose of the remains however one deems suitable?
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27125 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 9:28 am to
quote:

SO MAJ, answer the fricking question. Why is it okay to kill the fetus but not okay to dispose of the remains however one deems suitable?


Neither is ok, where exactly did you get the idea that I was pro-abortion?

So, now, GoldenAge, answer the fricking question. How many animals did you torture when you were young?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52787 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 10:12 am to
quote:

AggieHank86




Be a better poster.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

But why is it okay to kill the fetus but not keep the remains?


Again... ARE YOU ACTUALLY BEING SERIOUS?

Other than that, your stupid comment deserves no rebuttal, no comment, nothing. It's idiotic and stupid. That should suffice.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90611 posts
Posted on 9/16/19 at 11:29 am to
quote:

This was basically dead babies.


It was unborn fetuses. This was however unlawful disposal of biological waste
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram