- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Bob’s “We couldn’t get him, but Orange Man still bad” report
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:03 am
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:03 am
So the fate of “getting him” depends on how good of a writer Bob can find. He needs someone that can stir up an emotional response and really drive home that Orange Man is real bad. I’m thinking that you get a duo of the 50 shades author and someone like Maggie Haberman from the NYT. You can throw in a Krassenstein Bro and Sara Silverman for advice as well. The legal part of this story is over it’s time to transition to what really matters....the narrative.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:08 am to YankeeBama
I’m told that this report is the end of the witch hunt, but after about 2 1/2 years of a massive fishing expedition that went so far off the reservation it needed directions, I’m reluctant to believe it,
Fool me once, etc.
Fool me once, etc.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:18 am to TheHarahanian
I’m thinking Bob passes his Russian Romance Novel to someone like Swalwell to take up impeachment conversations for as long as Trump is around.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 7:38 am to YankeeBama
Front and center on my Google page this morn: "the legal battle that could undermine Law" per the Meuller Report.
Yet they totally ignore that POTUS Barack Obama was "at the top" running the whole Intel Community Surveillance Op (I.e., the "insurance policy"), which was based on a Document (Steele Dossier) which was purchased from the Russians by HRC's Campaign. Muh Russia...Muh Fascism...the Left is guilty of that which they accuse their Opposition of. It ain't Projection (psychoses)...it's strategy.
This is akin to talking Israeli/Palestinian peace with Yasser Arafat. Sew the wind...reap the whirlwind. Take a look at France...Trump is just a messenger, for all the Red on that Map, in response to the Fascist Left. They may kill the Messenger -burning what little cred the MSM has left - but that will only piss off those who champion the Message.
"The Fourth Turning". Vision don't come to the blinded by Talk. Collapse and reboot in the mail.
Yet they totally ignore that POTUS Barack Obama was "at the top" running the whole Intel Community Surveillance Op (I.e., the "insurance policy"), which was based on a Document (Steele Dossier) which was purchased from the Russians by HRC's Campaign. Muh Russia...Muh Fascism...the Left is guilty of that which they accuse their Opposition of. It ain't Projection (psychoses)...it's strategy.
This is akin to talking Israeli/Palestinian peace with Yasser Arafat. Sew the wind...reap the whirlwind. Take a look at France...Trump is just a messenger, for all the Red on that Map, in response to the Fascist Left. They may kill the Messenger -burning what little cred the MSM has left - but that will only piss off those who champion the Message.
"The Fourth Turning". Vision don't come to the blinded by Talk. Collapse and reboot in the mail.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:02 am to YankeeBama
quote:
So the fate of “getting him” depends on how good of a writer Bob can find.

Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:03 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
after about 2 1/2 years of a massive fishing expedition that went so far off the reservation it needed directions
And all it was able to find is a possible campaign finance violation for paying off a skank
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:14 am to YankeeBama
quote:
He needs someone
No matter how nonsensical this whole probe is this is true. His legal briefs look like my fricking boxer puppy wrote them.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 8:28 am to YankeeBama
You can best bet, that though there will be no evidence of any collision in the document, it will be written in a way to make Trump look guilty anyway and it will be written in a way that hurts him politically, and in a way that will give the MSN fodder to further bash Trump.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 9:30 am to Revelator
quote:
u can best bet, that though there will be no evidence of any collision in the document, it will be written in a way to make Trump look guilty anyway and it will be written in a way that hurts him politically, and in a way that will give the MSN fodder to further bash Trump.
I think that they will overplay their hand once again.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 9:32 am to YankeeBama
quote:
I think that they will overplay their hand once again.
But when all the media follows the same narrative, who will be there to call them out on it?
Only politically astute people will know that the report is bs.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 9:47 am to YankeeBama
My bet is that the report will claim that he “probably did collude with those terrible Russians, and that he’s obviously an all-around bad man, but that the crack team of special counsel investigateors just couldn’t get those lying liar witnesses to fess up.”
The case will be terminated for lack of proof (not “lack or evidence”).
“He did it, we just can’t prove it. Don’t ask us to tell you how we know, we just know, because Oranage Man bad and RUSSIA!”
Juxtapose that to Comey’s report on Hillary: “She did it, but she had no intent to break the law because, you know, she’s a woman and it’s her turn.”
The case will be terminated for lack of proof (not “lack or evidence”).
“He did it, we just can’t prove it. Don’t ask us to tell you how we know, we just know, because Oranage Man bad and RUSSIA!”
Juxtapose that to Comey’s report on Hillary: “She did it, but she had no intent to break the law because, you know, she’s a woman and it’s her turn.”
Posted on 12/8/18 at 11:04 am to Jimbeaux
I’m starting to think that some of the Dems might encourage the others to stay away from impeachment talks even after the report. It would be impossible in the Senate and fire up the magas.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 1:17 pm to YankeeBama
quote:
I’m starting to think that some of the Dems might encourage the others to stay away from impeachment talks even after the report. It would be impossible in the Senate and fire up the magas.
nope, they have shown themselves to be incapable of reasoning or any rational thought process plus they couldnt give a frick what "normal" people think about what they say and do, because they know illegals and the sheeple will still vote dimm as long as the MSM is there to spout the socialist propaganda repubs are bad and dimms will give you free stuff
Posted on 12/8/18 at 2:40 pm to keakar
quote:
because they know illegals and the sheeple will still vote dimm as long as the MSM is there to spout the socialist propaganda repubs are bad and dimms will give you free stuff
Yeah because this is rational thinking.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 3:51 pm to YankeeBama
You got to hand it to the Democrats. They can plan ahead and stay ahead of the Repub with their commitment to never tell the truth. But, it typically tells what their next move will be. For example, if the Democrats wanted to kill all the x people in the USA, they would come out a few months ahead and scream about how the Republicans hated the x people and they have seen reports of how the Repub wanted to kill the x people. And they would fake investigate and have grand juries up and running and everyday the media would be screaming about the poor x people about to be killed by the Republicans. The Democrats would be laughing backstage and the Republicans would be clueless.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 3:54 pm to Nguyener
quote:
And all it was able to find is a possible campaign finance violation for paying off a skank
You can use as much of your personal money as you want in a campaign
Posted on 12/8/18 at 4:18 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
massive fishing expedition that went so far off the reservation it needed directions, I’m reluctant to believe it,
Instead of remaining focussed on the original (erroneous) allegation, it became a 5 headed monster (more like a 500 headed one). We put safeguards in place to avoid this in public corruption investigations during my career with the GBI. Looks like Bob could learn a thing or two from us country cops.
Posted on 12/8/18 at 4:21 pm to CptBengal
Paying foreign spies under the table for Russian smear and using it to get deep state spy warrants = perfectly OK.
Taking 3 million in illegal campaign donations from the communist Chinese. = honest mistake
Laundering millions in downballot DNC donations into your personal campaign war chest = no big deal.
Striking settlements with ex girlfriends who threaten to embarrass you if you don’t give them money = campaign finance violation
Taking 3 million in illegal campaign donations from the communist Chinese. = honest mistake
Laundering millions in downballot DNC donations into your personal campaign war chest = no big deal.
Striking settlements with ex girlfriends who threaten to embarrass you if you don’t give them money = campaign finance violation
Posted on 12/9/18 at 10:13 am to jeffsdad
quote:
You got to hand it to the Democrats. They can plan ahead and stay ahead of the Repub with their commitment to never tell the truth. But, it typically tells what their next move will be. For example, if the Democrats wanted to kill all the x people in the USA, they would come out a few months ahead and scream about how the Republicans hated the x people and they have seen reports of how the Repub wanted to kill the x people. And they would fake investigate and have grand juries up and running and everyday the media would be screaming about the poor x people about to be killed by the Republicans. The Democrats would be laughing backstage and the Republicans would be clueless.
I think they’ve underestimated DJT. They have never fought someone that counters twice as hard and dirty.
Popular
Back to top
8












