- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boasberg plans to move quickly on Trump contempt inquiry in major immigration case
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:33 pm to Riverside
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:33 pm to Riverside
quote:Still waiting, Riverside.quote:Link?
SCOTUS approved Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act last week.
I recall only a procedural ruling preserving the status quo pending a full review.
2
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:36 pm to Decatur
quote:
I’ll repeat: you can’t ignore court orders. That’s following the law, not tyranny.
quote:
(Did I really have to explain this?)
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:38 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Placekicker got fooled by some influencer that there was new news on that subject.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:42 pm to TDTOM
quote:
STFU and stay out of this. Let these two figure it o
You must be confused. I asked Barry the question
quote:
Is it OK to ignore a judges orders if you disagree with them? Simple yes or no answer will suffice.
The response has been hours of childish insults, deflection, and nonsense.......all to deflect from the simple fact that you can't ignore the judge's order.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 8:09 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:Lather, rinse, repeat
Placekicker got fooled by some influencer that there was new news on that subject.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 8:14 pm to Decatur
quote:
You can’t ignore court orders.
Wasn't there an entire video made from Senators or congressman telling them to disobey unconstitutional order
Posted on 11/25/25 at 8:17 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
The Dems impeached Trump for little more reason than the fact that they did not like him. Trump is encouraging the impeachment of Boasberg because he doesn't like the judge's rulings.
You missed the part about “made up accusations on trump that were put together by his opposition”. Boasberg is rendering judgements that the scotus has drug their nuts over already. Besides all of that, let’s just assume that boasberg can actually bring litigation or some kind of dreamed up crap towards individuals involved, do you think they will be punished in anyway? Trump holds the pen that signs the “get out of jail” cards. It is ridiculous and a waste of time.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 8:37 pm to Decatur
quote:
I’ll repeat: you can’t ignore court orders. That’s following the law, not tyranny. (Did I really have to explain this?)
Yes. Repeat is all you want you stupid frick! A rogue judge who constantly rules against conservative because he is either bias or compromised is not a legit court order.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 10:51 pm to Decatur
quote:
I’ll repeat: you can’t ignore court orders. That’s following the law, not tyranny
Unless the the court order is illegitmate due to blatant liberal activism and lawfare
Posted on 11/26/25 at 1:21 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Still waiting, Riverside.
Here you go, friend. Glad to help educate you.
SCOTUS opinion from April that reversed Bosaberg initially.
LINK
And DC Circuit’s denial of petition for rehearing en banc order from November 14th, 2025 wherein appellate panel granted mandamus relief as to Bosaberg’s contempt proceedings.
LINK
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:20 am to Decatur
It has been done for decades by your side, dipshit.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:24 am to Riverside
quote:I don't think that is accurate, unfortunately.
SCOTUS approved Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act last week. This entire case is moot.
The case just hit the 5th Circuit in September. A 3 judge panel ruled 2-1 against the Administration, and issued a preliminary injunction.
The PI blocks use of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to deport Tren de Aragua members anywhere within the 5th Circuit (TX, LA, MS). A 5th Circuit en banc review was requested and is pending. So maybe the PI gets reversed at that point? Regardless, an appeal to SCOTUS is inevitable (would be probably be heard in the late-2026/early-2027 timeframe).
So as I understand it, we're a year or more away from a SCOTUS ruling on Trump’s use of the AEA, one way or another.
In the meantime, TdA deportations continue, albeit under more laborious, time-consuming non-AEA methods.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 5:19 am to Riverside
so, SCOTUS did not do anything last week. Thank you for acknowledging your lie.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 5:46 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:Stupid assertion.
lie
Perhaps instead of pursuing a gotcha, just post the facts (which others may or may not have access to) and make your case.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 6:57 am to Houag80
quote:
It has been done for decades by your side, dipshit.
If that was true, which it isn't, it should be easy for you to provide lots of examples.......but you can't.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 7:58 am to Bama Mountain
Who are you again? And, why should I care?
Posted on 11/26/25 at 8:02 am to Houag80
quote:
Who are you again? And, why should I care?
Is this your way of admitting that it actually hasn't be "done for decades"?
Posted on 11/26/25 at 8:14 am to Bama Mountain
Bama Mountain.... your arguments sound suspiciously similar to another poster around here.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 8:21 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Bama Mountain.... your arguments sound suspiciously similar to another poster around here
Glad to know there are other fact based people here…. sorry to disappoint you, there is only one of me.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News