Bloomberg the weakest candidate in Dem field?

And the womenfolk who so many people opine are at-risk swing voters that many may find Trump off-putting, even if that's true, Bloomberg doesn't appear to be a better alternative in that regard given recent revelations about his unsettling treatment of the fairer sex.

Funny how politics works. The party not in power always seems to have a weak field of candidates. Democrats in 2004, Republicans in 2012, Democrats in 2020.

It’s no wonder how Presidents are now in office for two terms since ‘92.

quote:

---

Only downside is he likely puts billions into down ballot races in the senate and House that could make those races harder

---

I’m hoping Bernie is the candidate, he would get skull dragged in an election. Bloomberg is a weak candidate, but he can literally buy/pay off any democrat politician for an endorsement without really affecting his net worth.

The strongest Dem candidate (at this point) is a communist. Dems are the worst.

Still waiting to see some real frickery at their convention. Hillary has both shoes ready.

quote:

---

Bloomberg the weakest candidate in Dem field?

---

I don't think so. I think he would be their best chance actually. I think he would still fall short, but he has two major advantages over the rest of the Democrats in the field.

1) money. The entire DNC is teetering on the edge of insolvency and Bloomberg is the only candidate they have that can match Trump in spending.

2) economics. The economy is going to be Trump's wheelhouse. Bloomberg can at least stand on a debate stage and actually challenge Trump in the realm of economics.

However, despite those two things, the likelihood of Bloomberg actually gaining the nomination are slim to none. He simply is too much like Trump in his personality to gain any traction among a group of people who are diametrically opposed to chauvanism.

Like Tulsi Gabbard, Bloomberg makes too much sense for the Democrats to consider.

quote:

---

What distinguishes Klobuchar from the others?

---

I had thought previously that Klobuchar isn't too bad an option for the Democrats but she destroyed that possibility by suffering a breakdown on the debate stage.

It sucks, but as a woman you simply cannot show weakness like that. She is dead in the water because as Commander in Chief you simply cannot be perceived as weak.

She would be destroyed in the debates by Trump. And the same goes for Warren.

If you're going to run as a woman, you must project strength. Tulsi Gabbard had a real shot, IMO. But for whatever reason the Democrats wouldn't consider it.

He's not as weak as Amy Klobuchar. She lost her marbles over a mild rebuke from Butt Boy. Just imagine her melt if they were all attacking her.

If Pocahontas had done the same thing to Amy Klobuchar that she did to Bloomberg, little Amy would've needed medical attention.

Unfortunately too many people could see right through Hillary Clinton.

Worst Presidential Candidate I've ever seen.

Not only is she transparently corrupt, she is lazy and feels entitled. She was arrogant enough to think she could totally avoid campaigning in key states and those people would vote for her anyways because of who she is.

Hillary Clinton will go down in history as perhaps the worst politician in our nation's history. In fact, history may prove that she didn't even legitimately win the popular vote. I firmly believe they cheated that election and still lost.

That would be like a moron calling someone an idiot.