- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Blanche confirms the DOJ has more evidence against Comey than just his '8647' post
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:54 am to AlterEd
Posted on 5/4/26 at 6:54 am to AlterEd
Keep to your day job at the Tyson plant plucking chickens with your musings. Blanche knows fully well, that he has nothing beyond this for even a superseding indictment..
1
Posted on 5/4/26 at 7:15 am to Penrod
quote:
If all he did was the seashells then that is perfectly legal.
Wouldn't that depend on how a jury interprets the arrangement of sea shells and its intended message?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 8:08 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Wouldn't that depend on how a jury interprets the arrangement of sea shells and its intended message?
No. No judge would ever let something that stupid get to a jury. Now, if he has a pattern of threats, or did or said something more provocative, that’s different.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 8:10 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 8:17 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Blanche knows fully well, that he has nothing beyond this for even a superseding indictment..
This post amounts to sticking ones fingers in their ears and saying "nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, nah, I can't hear you."
Good job, retard.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 8:19 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 8:18 am to boosiebadazz
You post clown memes, but you're the "lawyer" who had to have this shite explained to him by a layman. frick off, ya frickin square.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 8:33 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Does anyone believe that Mr. Comey did not make that seashell message himself?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 8:40 am to AlterEd
I understand that’s what you think happened here
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:31 am to boosiebadazz
That is what's happening here. You can't see it because you have too much emotional investment in believing nothing is going to happen. You have spent years here insisting nothing would happen and ridiculing people who disagreed. If you hadn't spent so long being such an insufferable douche-canoe you might be able to look at things objectively. But as they stand now you cannot.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 9:55 am to AlterEd
Your projection is hilarious, even for someone from Arkansas. This was a rushed indictment so that Blanche can prove that he is a loyal soldier and will operate in a Roy Cohn like manner. Also it's part of his job interview.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:16 am to AlterEd
Brother, you said they only charged him with the seashells because they were worried about overcharging him.
Federal prosecutors, under Donald J. Trump, were worried about overcharging Jim Comey?
Come on, man. Give us a little “honk, honk” with that clown world nonsense.
Federal prosecutors, under Donald J. Trump, were worried about overcharging Jim Comey?
Come on, man. Give us a little “honk, honk” with that clown world nonsense.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 10:17 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:58 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:00 pm to SingleMalt1973
quote:
Wonder what will happen…..
They got an indictment. The case is in North Carolina…and you say nothing will happen. So edgy.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I guess we will see once Comey files his Motion to Dismiss.
On what grounds ?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:01 pm to Penrod
quote:
If all he did was the seashells then that is perfectly legal.
Maybe. Maybe not.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:03 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Then why did they only charge the seashell thing in the indictment?
Dude.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:14 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
Your projection is hilarious, even for someone from Arkansas. This was a rushed indictment so that Blanche can prove that he is a loyal soldier and will operate in a Roy Cohn like manner. Also it's part of his job interview.
Wrong, like usual. Don’t worry….ill walk you through it. First…what are the elements of the crime?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:24 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Every word out of this slimeballs mouth is a lie because Trump tells him to lie. Just 2 weeks ago the Southern Poverty scandal was front news, now its completly falling apart because it was made up BS, and soon another distraction will be brought up just as the Comey inditement 2.0 is dismissed.
I'ts the same old script over and over, create a lie to try and hurt someones reputation, drag it out as long as you can, then move on to the next target/distraction.
I'ts the same old script over and over, create a lie to try and hurt someones reputation, drag it out as long as you can, then move on to the next target/distraction.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:29 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
No serious person believes that Comey didn't know what "86" could mean.
“Could mean” isn’t the same thing as proving “he meant that”
There was already an “8646” message when Biden was President. That didn’t result in an indictment.
But we’ll see what Blanche has…
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:39 pm to The1TrueTiger
quote:
Just 2 weeks ago the Southern Poverty scandal was front news, now its completly falling apart because it was made up BS
The grand jury didn’t think so. I think there were 11 indictments handed down to the SPLC today. Never not entertaining when you morons post with hubris from a place of complete ignorance.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:39 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Brother, you said they only charged him with the seashells because they were worried about overcharging him.
"Brother", you acted incredulous at the idea that they could possibly have any more evidence to present in a case where they were charging him with the seashells. Even as a layman I understand that they need to prove the intent that they say he had behind that Twitter post and that that will include additional evidence.
This concept seems lost on you and you claim to be a frickin lawyer.
You are one stupid motherfricker.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News