- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:05 pm to L.A.
It’s true for every member of the animal kingdom that ever existed. Why wouldn’t it be true for human beings?
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:33 pm to L.A.
An incomplete explanation, because embryology is step-wise, and thus you have numerous chances for distinct pathophysiologies to develop, many of which were described more fully in the literature rather recently. My own personal theory, after having spoken with many trans individuals who present with gender dysphoria without DSDs, is that there's a possible link between maternal cortisol dysregulation and lack of virilization, or incomplete virilization in the brain. That could explain why you will have brain scans in trans individuals like their desired sex without issues in chromosomal, gonadal and hormonal sex, because the dysregulation in the maternal tissue was only transient.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:36 pm to L.A.
Agreed on 2 genders but I really do think gender dysphoria exists. It's a disorder even though you'd get cancelled for saying that
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:42 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
what is occurring today is a destruction of objective truth, which is why the same people who attack reality-based gender norms are also attacking other established realities of truth in other disciplines.
It was foretold... they will exchange the truth for a lie and worship the created rather than the Creator...
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:46 pm to L.A.
Well I guess Colin Wright and Emma Hilton just got canceled. Glad they spoke out though. The alphabet of weirdos needs to put in their place. Anyone who thinks there are more than two genders is mentally ill. And before anyone brings up hermaphrodites finding one of those is about like finding a unicorn or a mermaid. They have only been seen in very grainy 1980's pornos. 
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:50 pm to My Name Is Not Rick
quote:Of course.
Agreed on 2 genders but I really do think gender dysphoria exists
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:52 pm to L.A.
quote:
Message Biologists Say There Are Only Two Genders, No Gender 'Spectrum
Filthy Progs be like.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:53 pm to crazy4lsu
That’s why god made mental institutions
We should have never closed them
We should have never closed them
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:55 pm to NashvilleTider
quote:
We should have never closed them
Oh, I agree and our refusal to spend money on mental health in this country AND not call mental illness what it is has created a lot of our problems...
There needs to be effective treatment AND some folks need to be punched in the mouth a couple of times...
Posted on 10/20/21 at 12:56 pm to L.A.
The enter "gender is a spectrum" argument is an exercise in calling variable personalities "genders".
I knew a guy in my early 20s who was feminine as frick. Crossed his legs like a girl. Walked with dead perfect posture. High voice. The whole deal. Yet, he was in shape, had good hair and most women found him attractive.
And he was knee deep in pussy 24/7.
I've known girls who fit in great with the guys. Had the male "competitiveness" thing going on. Preferred jeans and t-shirts to ever dressing "like a girl" who were also sexy as frick and 1000% woman in the bedroom.
Then, a bunch of morons in our fake sciences of sociology and psychology started labeling these differences "genders" with absolutely nothing to base it upon other than to be new and edgy.
It would be like labeling a shy person and a super Type A person as somehow, different kinds of humans when they are really just 2 types of personality.
I knew a guy in my early 20s who was feminine as frick. Crossed his legs like a girl. Walked with dead perfect posture. High voice. The whole deal. Yet, he was in shape, had good hair and most women found him attractive.
And he was knee deep in pussy 24/7.
I've known girls who fit in great with the guys. Had the male "competitiveness" thing going on. Preferred jeans and t-shirts to ever dressing "like a girl" who were also sexy as frick and 1000% woman in the bedroom.
Then, a bunch of morons in our fake sciences of sociology and psychology started labeling these differences "genders" with absolutely nothing to base it upon other than to be new and edgy.
It would be like labeling a shy person and a super Type A person as somehow, different kinds of humans when they are really just 2 types of personality.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:00 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
many of which were described more fully in the literature rather recently.
Well of course its been published rather recently. Until very recently, we called these people cross-dressers, trannies, and mentally ill which they are.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:04 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
An incomplete explanation, because embryology is step-wise, and thus you have numerous chances for distinct pathophysiologies to develop, many of which were described more fully in the literature rather recently. My own personal theory, after having spoken with many trans individuals who present with gender dysphoria without DSDs, is that there's a possible link between maternal cortisol dysregulation and lack of virilization, or incomplete virilization in the brain. That could explain why you will have brain scans in trans individuals like their desired sex without issues in chromosomal, gonadal and hormonal sex, because the dysregulation in the maternal tissue was only transient.
This is the kind of thing that could be shite out of the Deepak Chopra BS generator
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:13 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The gender spectrum is a philosophical problem, not a scientific one. It's clear that there are only two sexes: "God made them male and female"; but what is occurring today is a destruction of objective truth, which is why the same people who attack reality-based gender norms are also attacking other established realities of truth in other disciplines.
Yep, if someone can get you to say that there are more than two genders and that men can get pregnant they can get you to say anything. Any objective truth has to be Erased by the left, because it's competition with their subjective truths.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:16 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:Well, these are the same people who have pushed the idea that math is somehow racist.............so, there's no limit to their idiocy
Yep, if someone can get you to say that there are more than two genders and that men can get pregnant they can get you to say anything. Any objective truth has to be Erased by the left, because it's competition with their subjective truths.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:19 pm to L.A.
Biology has very little to do with gender.
The word you're looking for is sex.
This paragraph is a mess. Gender is obviously a social construct. Which has nothing to do with male and female. Male and female are not arbitrary groupings. No sociologist would ever argue this.
The word you're looking for is sex.
quote:
And what about the gender “spectrum” and gender being a social construct? Wright and Hilton completely destroy the basis of these concepts. “If male and female are merely arbitrary groupings, it follows that everyone, regardless of genetics or anatomy should be free to choose to identify as male or female, or to reject sex entirely in favor of a new bespoke ‘gender identity,'
This paragraph is a mess. Gender is obviously a social construct. Which has nothing to do with male and female. Male and female are not arbitrary groupings. No sociologist would ever argue this.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:23 pm to L.A.
The title says "gender" while the article says "sex".
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:26 pm to Wasting Time
quote:
The enter "gender is a spectrum" argument is an exercise in calling variable personalities "genders".
I knew a guy in my early 20s who was feminine as frick. Crossed his legs like a girl. Walked with dead perfect posture. High voice. The whole deal. Yet, he was in shape, had good hair and most women found him attractive.
And he was knee deep in pussy 24/7.
I've known girls who fit in great with the guys. Had the male "competitiveness" thing going on. Preferred jeans and t-shirts to ever dressing "like a girl" who were also sexy as frick and 1000% woman in the bedroom.
Then, a bunch of morons in our fake sciences of sociology and psychology started labeling these differences "genders" with absolutely nothing to base it upon other than to be new and edgy.
It would be like labeling a shy person and a super Type A person as somehow, different kinds of humans when they are really just 2 types of personality.
The social sciences have become confused with the hard sciences. Social sciences largely are a joke now (I have a S.S. degree lol) and not worth shite.
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:28 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
Biology has very little to do with gender.
Spoken like a true non-scientist
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:29 pm to LSUnKaty
quote:that's because despite what a bunch of idiots in social "sciences" say, they are the same.
The title says "gender" while the article says "sex".
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 1:30 pm
Page 2 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News