Started By
Message

re: Biologists Say There Are Only Two Genders, No Gender 'Spectrum'

Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by CoachChappy
Member since May 2013
32535 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Biology has very little to do with gender.

The word you're looking for is sex


This is exactly what liberals said in the beginning.

Now, they are claiming that men can have periods and give birth.

Females can have a penis and compete equally with biological females
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

This is exactly what liberals said in the beginning.

Now, they are claiming that men can have periods and give birth.

Females can have a penis and compete equally with biological females




This is because when your "science" is 100% based on what you WANT to be true, then, literally ANYTHING can be "true" and "scientific"
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Really?


Yes.

quote:

So, your idea of science changes according to political whims and wishes?


The result of the study does not change based on whims. We don't now understand that gender is a social construct because it is highly politicized. We understand it is a construct based on the science.

The earth being round was highly politicized, does that mean that the resulting information concluded from the study of a round earth make it not science? Your argument just doesn't hold up to any sort of scrutiny.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27117 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

We understand it is a construct based on the science.


What field of science specifically, name it.

quote:

does not change based on whims.


Everything to do with gender has changed and changed on the whims...

quote:

earth being round was highly politicized


Actually the earth being flat of was highly politicized, kinda like your "genders" and "gender studies", which proves my point... You have no basis for your assertions in science... none...
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68578 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

This paragraph is a mess. Gender is obviously a social construct. Which has nothing to do with male and female. Male and female are not arbitrary groupings. No sociologist would ever argue this.



So you agree that calling yourself a woman doesnt make you one.

Glad we sorted that out.
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

We understand it is a construct based on the science.
There is exactly zero "science" that tells you this.

quote:

The earth being round was highly politicized, does that mean that the resulting information concluded from the study of a round earth make it not science? Your argument just doesn't hold up to any sort of scrutiny.


You should be embarrassed. I mean, I know you're not. But you should be
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105403 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:06 pm to
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Everything to do with gender has changed and changed on the whims...


That's just not true. I'm not sure why you think something that is so easily disprovable. There are studies on gender. You can read them yourself.

You really should do that.
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

What field of science specifically, name it.


Ya notice he has avoided THAT like the plague
quote:

Actually the earth being flat of was highly politicized, kinda like your "genders" and "gender studies", which proves my point... You have no basis for your assertions in science... none...

Yup

ACTUAL SCIENTISTS are who proved it round. It was the emotional wreck's like Convert who couldn't let go of the flat earth
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56254 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

a social construct.

Imagine thinking gender is a social construct.
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

There are studies on gender.
Cool

Link your favorite.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27117 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

There are studies on gender.


highly politicized and whimsical studies on a social construct... STILL NOT science...
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

ACTUAL SCIENTISTS are who proved it round.


They are actual scientists for the method which they were using, not the conclusion they came to.
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

No sociologist would ever argue this.
Why would I care what a non-scientist has to say on the subject?
Posted by LSUconvert
Hattiesburg, MS
Member since Aug 2007
6229 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

STILL NOT science...


Again, I'm not sure why you're stating something so easily disprovable. It is science, by definition.
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Again, I'm not sure why you're stating something so easily disprovable. It is science, by definition.

Nope
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Well of course its been published rather recently. Until very recently, we called these people cross-dressers, trannies, and mentally ill which they are.



No, because genetic research has progressed to the degree that we can describe and categorize DSDs to inheritance patterns and specific genes.
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27117 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

They are actual scientists for the method which they were using


Can you name the field of science of which you are referring... specifically, please...
Posted by Wasting Time
Member since Oct 2021
310 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Can you name the field of science of which you are referring... specifically, please...

He sorta slipped up a bit ago and did.

Sociologists!!!!
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68578 posts
Posted on 10/20/21 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

When my colleague Corinne Purtill bought her doll-loving daughter an engineering kit, she had to laugh when the then-three-year-old used the present as a hairbrush. For all Corinne’s efforts at gender-neutral parenting, her daughter clearly enjoyed some traditionally feminine toys.

A study published (paywall) in November 2017 suggests that these sorts of girly toy preferences aren’t simply a reflection of gendered social pressures.



i could have told you this. boys and girls in general gravitate towards things without any social push that matches your construct of gender and their biological sex.

Gender is not a social construct.

you wouldnt catch me with a doll in my hands, but pockets full of rocks. Im a male and thats what we gravitate towards without social pressures.

girls like baby dolls because it is biological that they are the nurturers. It is ingrained in them to want to raise children from birth.
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 2:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram