- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/28/19 at 7:21 pm to TrueTiger
Two words:
1. Fair
2. Use
1. Fair
2. Use
Posted on 7/28/19 at 7:24 pm to Sunbeam
quote:
It would be epic if Trump vetoed this. Would they have enough votes to pass it without his signature?
I hope he does as I see this as an attempt to muzzle his supporters.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 7:32 pm to BuckyCheese
quote:
I hope he does as I see this as an attempt to muzzle his supporters.
Drumpf won't allow the government to take action against Russian memes! Orange Man Bad!
- NPCNN, BSNBC, etc.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 7:34 pm to TrueTiger
As I read this I imagined AOC typing this bill with her teeth.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 7:37 pm to TrueTiger
This bullshite started when motherfrickers started watermarking their memes and post them as videos.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 7:47 pm to TrueTiger
Find out who wrote the bill and meme the frick out of them.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:01 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Senators John Kennedy (R-LA)
Well frick that piece of shite
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:14 pm to Mud_Till_May
quote:
Find out who wrote the bill and meme the frick out of them.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:16 pm to Mud_Till_May
Disappointing that’s Doug Collins would author this shite
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:18 pm to Sunbeam
quote:
It would be epic if Trump vetoed this
Prepare for epicness
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:25 pm to TrueTiger
This will never make it past a veto.
Even if it does, the Fair Use Act is already precedent.
Even if it does, the Fair Use Act is already precedent.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:28 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Senators John Kennedy (R-LA)
frick.
He went from hero to frickwad in just a couple weeks.
"[The squad] is the reason we have instructions on shampoo bottles"
(Hell of a verbal meme)
to
Attempting to destroy memes.
Yet again, the Republicans can't sustain even a marginal offensive.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:45 pm to Jcorye1
quote:Or protecting the rights of those who CREATE intellectual property…
The only thing they can agree on is destroying our rights.
I actually would have expected this to be a forum on which the majority would support protecting the rights of those who own property from infringement by those who seek to appropriate that private property.
I guess that concept only applies when the misappropriation is not entertaining or humorous.
:format(jpeg)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/56360251/sub_buzz_13357_1503609440_1.0.jpeg)
The photographer who created this image spent a day of his time and hired three models to undertake this photoshoot and create images for sale in the stock image market. He has not made one red cent of all of the misappropriation of his image.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:50 pm to TrueTiger
Needs to be a "Free Speech/Fair Use" exemption for non-commercial use.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:55 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Will never be enforced
Wrong!!! It will be used to shut down sites like Tigerdroppings.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:56 pm to TrueTiger
attempt at censorship.
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:57 pm to AggieHank86
Well this is not a libertarian argument at all. It is being used as a parody or joking manner by individuals who usually are not profiting on the image. While you have a point if businesses and/or individuals profit it off said image, this legislation would disproportionately affect non-income generating users of it.
I'm also willing to bet there is already legislation out there in regards to using it in a profit based manner.
I'm also willing to bet there is already legislation out there in regards to using it in a profit based manner.
This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:58 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:I disagree strongly. There are plenty of images available in the public domain and pretty much everyone in the country owns a camera.
Needs to be a "Free Speech/Fair Use" exemption for non-commercial use.
There is absolutely no necessity for stealing copyrighted material when you feel like being cute.
Let’s use the well-known image of the boyfriend with the roving eye.
What are the chances that that photographer (who expended time money and effort in creating the image) can now actually sell that image on the stock image market? Zero, right? Who is going to buy an image that is already flooding the Internet?
Everyone who used (and/or altered) his image decreased the value of his property by misappropriating the image for their own use
This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 7/28/19 at 9:00 pm to Jcorye1
quote:You think libertarians do not support private property rights?
Well this is not a libertarian argument at all.
OK.
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News