- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden picks Ketanji Brown Jackson for Supreme Court
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:38 am to Origins of Asymmetry
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:38 am to Origins of Asymmetry
quote:
Had he just picked her and not come out and said that she would be viewed on her merits as she should be.
Yep.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:38 am to Origins of Asymmetry
quote:
Unfortunately for her everyone is going to assume that she isn't qualified since Biden came out and said ahead of time that picking a black woman was part of his criteria. Had he just picked her and not come out and said that she would be viewed on her merits as she should be.
Spot on. She’s a quota hire because POTUS is a frickwad
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 8:39 am
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:39 am to teke184
quote:
She can also thank Obama for that perception while we are at it. Sotomayor is arguably the least competent justice in my lifetime and was picked solely to check certain boxes.
Have people all of a sudden forgotten that the vast majority of SCOTUS justices selected in history were white men? The majority of Trump’s overall judicial nominees were young white males. Even if such criteria wasn’t publicly stated by Trump, the pattern was still clearly there in his selections.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:40 am to fatboydave
Fun fact:
She sentenced a black man to prison for 12 years for selling 8 ounces of weed.
She sentenced a black man to prison for 12 years for selling 8 ounces of weed.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:43 am to Origins of Asymmetry
quote:
Unfortunately for her everyone is going to assume that she isn't qualified since Biden came out and said ahead of time that picking a black woman was part of his criteria.
Her entire education has happened at a time when she received preferential treatment because of her race. Now this.
I'm not going to a black doctor for heart surgery. Maybe an African one. But certainly not a black doctor. That's called rational self-interest.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:44 am to Origins of Asymmetry
quote:
Unfortunately for her everyone is going to assume that she isn't qualified since Biden came out and said ahead of time that picking a black woman was part of his criteria.
Why would “everyone” assume she isn’t qualified because she is a black woman? Seems like the “everyone” you are referring to are bigots.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:45 am to c on z
Doesn’t change the fact that putting people on the bench solely for checking boxes is counter-productive when those people are too goddamn incompetent to do the job.
If Sotomayor was the best Hispanic that Obama could find to put on the bench, I think that says a lot about the quality of candidates they had to choose from.
If Sotomayor was the best Hispanic that Obama could find to put on the bench, I think that says a lot about the quality of candidates they had to choose from.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:47 am to TBoy
quote:
Why would “everyone” assume she isn’t qualified because she is a black woman? Seems like the “everyone” you are referring to are bigots.
It’s a byproduct of the history of people in general questioning the qualifications of minorities in these types of situations. This of course hardly ever happened with Trump’s overall judicial nominees from the people within his own party.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:48 am to TBoy
The assumption is that, by picking from a very small group of candidates, you are not finding someone who would necessarily have been chosen in a more exhaustive search.
If I go out and say the next SCOTUS nominee will be a bipolar trans Hmong immigrant, that narrows down the pool of candidates to almost nil.
If I go out and say the next SCOTUS nominee will be a bipolar trans Hmong immigrant, that narrows down the pool of candidates to almost nil.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:48 am to TBoy
quote:
Two degrees from Harvard
I’m not suggesting she isn’t qualified.
But a degree from Harvard is meaningless to me.
Some of the worst, most uninformed colleagues with whom I’ve worked hold degrees from Harvard.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to C
quote:
She married a WHITE surgeon so she’s not that bad at decision making.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:50 am to fatboydave
Oh look TBoy and conz being racist tds infected morons
How shocking
How shocking
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:55 am to TBoy
quote:
Unfortunately for her everyone is going to assume that she isn't qualified since Biden came out and said ahead of time that picking a black woman was part of his criteria.
Why would “everyone” assume she isn’t qualified because she is a black woman? Seems like the “everyone” you are referring to are bigots.
This is what you idiots don’t understand.
People assume that she may not be qualified not because of her intrinsic skin color(that WOULD) be racist.
No, they may assume she isn’t qualified because affirmative action has perennially elevated her above, and to the exclusion of, her potentially more qualified peers.
She COULD be the best, sure. But we will never know because affirmative action has poisoned the well.
Which is why affirmative action is racist in two directions. It discriminates against whites(and now Asians) in one direction, and discriminates against blacks in the other because it screams, “We don’t think you are good enough to get here on your own merits, only if we rig the system in your favor”.
This post was edited on 2/25/22 at 9:00 am
Posted on 2/25/22 at 8:59 am to cajunangelle
quote:
The R's pick the moderates close to the middle. The D's pick marxists.
give me a break
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:00 am to TBoy
quote:
Two degrees from Harvard, clerked for Breyer, some ti e on the bench. I don’t know much about her but the resume is certainly in the zone of a Supreme Court nominee.
Those weren't even listed as part of the qualifications. I mean, is she reeeeealllly black or just kinda black? That matters. I worry that she may be a natural born female, not sure why they couldn't have found a black trans judge. I am literally shaking I am so mad.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:01 am to Cole Beer
Are you saying none of the current admins nominees have been marxists or straight commies?
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:02 am to Origins of Asymmetry
quote:
She may very well be qualified but thanks to Biden, no one will ever give her that benefit of a doubt.
Pretty much every republican nominee is labeled a sex criminal by dems during the nomination process. Most ultimately earn respect as they display competency, judgement, and reason. If she's not another Sotomayor, people will eventually respect her too.
Posted on 2/25/22 at 9:04 am to fatboydave
He went with the hyper liberal of course.
Popular
Back to top



0







