View in: Desktop
Copyright @2022 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Biden opposed and filibustered a black female judicial nominee in 2003 AND 2005Posted by L.A. 
on 1/28/22 at 6:43 pm
on 1/28/22 at 6:43 pm
32
1quote:
President Joe Biden on Thursday reiterated his campaign promise of nominating a Black woman to the Supreme Court, leading some conservative pundits to bring up his past opposition to Janice Rogers Brown.
As Laura Ingraham noted on the Wednesday edition of her Fox News show, then-Senator Biden opposed and then filibustered the nomination of Brown to the federal bench in 2003 and 2005
Then-President George W. Bush had nominated Brown both times for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, but many Democrats tried to block her from the position for her perceived libertarian views.
newsweek via msn
Posted by Mickey Goldmill 
on 1/28/22 at 6:47 pm to L.A.
on 1/28/22 at 6:47 pm to L.A.Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
Posted by midnight_chopper on 1/28/22 at 6:50 pm to Mickey Goldmill
How is it a narrative when he said that is what he is going to do?
Posted by lsuguy84 
on 1/28/22 at 6:51 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 6:51 pm to Mickey GoldmillNo, but you know that. You’re just a disingenuous piece of shite.
Posted by Godfather1 on 1/28/22 at 6:54 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 6:54 pm to Mickey Goldmillquote:
Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
Umm, he said that’s why he’d be picking her, Homer.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit 
on 1/28/22 at 6:57 pm to L.A.
on 1/28/22 at 6:57 pm to L.A.Some senator needs to bring this up on the floor of the Senate.
Posted by Open Your Eyes on 1/28/22 at 6:58 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
You mean the narrative that he has repeated multiple times with his own mouth?
Look how fricking stupid you have to force yourself to be to justify the abomination you voted for.
Posted by junkfunky 
on 1/28/22 at 7:00 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 7:00 pm to Mickey Goldmillquote:
narrative
Now y'all are changing the meaning of direct quote to narrative. Stop raping the English language!
Posted by ShortyRob on 1/28/22 at 7:04 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 7:04 pm to Mickey Goldmillquote:
Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
Sometimes you're just retarded
Posted by EastBankTiger on 1/28/22 at 7:07 pm to L.A.
on 1/28/22 at 7:07 pm to L.A.Better still, the Democratic Senator who stood on the Senate floor on June 8, 2005 to oppose her nomination...
Barack Obama of Illinois.
Barack Obama of Illinois.
This post was edited on 1/28 at 7:08 pm
Posted by jimmy the leg on 1/28/22 at 7:15 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 7:15 pm to Mickey Goldmillquote:
Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
Since she didn’t vote for Biden, she obviously isn’t black.
Your deflection is moot.
Posted by GRTiger on 1/28/22 at 7:15 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 7:15 pm to Mickey GoldmillOf course not. That's not even a narrative, it's just what he's doing, according to himself.
It does confirm beyond any doubt that his plan to nominate based on race and gender is something he's doing only because he believes it's politically expedient to him, not because he cares about lifting up minority women or selecting the best candidate.
It does confirm beyond any doubt that his plan to nominate based on race and gender is something he's doing only because he believes it's politically expedient to him, not because he cares about lifting up minority women or selecting the best candidate.
Posted by BuckyCheese 
on 1/28/22 at 7:19 pm to ShortyRob
on 1/28/22 at 7:19 pm to ShortyRobquote:
Sometimes you're just retarded
Actually Mickey is pretty consistent in his retarded takes. It's not a sometimes thing.
Posted by L.A. on 1/28/22 at 7:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 7:37 pm to Mickey Goldmillquote:It doesn't go against it. It just narrows it. He's looking for a black female rubber stamp. I'm not sure that's any better than just looking for a black female.
Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
This post was edited on 1/28 at 10:09 pm
Posted by TigerAxeOK on 1/28/22 at 7:47 pm to Mickey Goldmill
on 1/28/22 at 7:47 pm to Mickey Goldmillquote:
Doesn’t this go against the narrative that he’s picking someone based solely on “black woman?”
Posted by Mickey Goldmill on 1/28/22 at 9:39 pm to L.A.
on 1/28/22 at 9:39 pm to L.A.quote:
It doesn't go against it. It just narrows it. He's looking for a black female rubber stamp. I'm now sure that's any better than just looking for a black female.
Narrows it. That’s my point. Obviously his choice isn’t based SOLEY on the person being a black woman. It has to be a black woman who has certain beliefs/qualifications that he agrees with.
Posted by LongueCarabine on 1/28/22 at 9:39 pm to L.A.
on 1/28/22 at 9:39 pm to L.A.quote:
woman?”
It doesn't go against it. It just narrows it. He's looking for a black female rubber stamp. I'm now sure that's any better than just looking for a black female.
This. He’s looking for a black woman who will vote the “right” (or should that be left)? Way.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News