- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Biden once again threatens conservative Americans with F-15s
Posted on 1/16/23 at 12:54 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 1/16/23 at 12:54 pm to Y.A. Tittle
It’s good to know we’re in their heads. The founders threw a monkey wrench in their totalitarian bullshite when they gave us the 2nd A. Sheer genius.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 12:55 pm to RollTide1987
Let's Go Brandon... Let's Go Brandon
Let's GO Brandon
Let's GO Brandon
Posted on 1/16/23 at 12:58 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
In his speech that was supposed to honor MLK, Biden began to ramble on and on about how Americans don't need assault weapons and how they will be useless against the Federal government because it has F-15s.
Biden is pretty dumb. A citizen can buy demilitarized warplanes legally.
Probably wouldn't take much to arm it with something.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 12:58 pm to BigMob
Mr. President please lay out the reasonable hypothetical scenario whereby you might envision utilizing F-15 fighter jets domestically against US citizen insurgents.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 12:58 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Biden began to ramble on and on
senile old tyrant.
Hasn't it just been discovered that he had classified documents locked up in the (probably damp) garage with his car? What else is in that garage? Probably some assault rifles that Hunter forgot to throw in the dumpster.
FJB FJB FJB FJB
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:00 pm to jcaz
quote:
And that’s assuming you can even get the F-15 pilots to actually use it against Americans.
I always figured they’d use drones that way they can just get some soyboys in a room with screens and controllers to do it.
Could our military even defend our own bases within the country? They aren’t that protected. We have seen mass shootings on a base before, and most are not armed on base. Our active carrier groups and active equipment is usually overseas somewhere. Who is to say if things got bad, a few thousand civilians in trucks couldn’t overrun a base and take control of all the military equipment there? Even if we couldn’t use it all, it could be disabled.
What about defense contractors? How guarded are they? How easy would it be to storm a manufacturing facility and disable it? Blow up railroads and bridges to prevent shipping of materials? Attack the electrical grid?
There are ways to quickly level the playing field if it got to the point people have had enough and had some level of organizational leadership. I hope such things never occur, but it’s disingenuous to think it cannot be done because our military has great technology. That tech relies on parts, fuel, electricity, etc to function. All of which comes from inside the US. All of which wouldn’t be hard to sabotage if people really wanted to.
Then it’s just a street fight with rifles and civilans have the numbers
This post was edited on 1/16/23 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:02 pm to deltaland
I personally feel like there would be a military coup before commanders actually follow the order to fire their guns against people on U.S. soil.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:06 pm to deltaland
quote:
Could our military even defend our own bases within the country? They aren’t that protected
Not really. Our air defense systems are worse than eastern counterparts.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:07 pm to RollTide1987
Would not be the first time that the military forces of the United States of America waged war against my people.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:10 pm to RollTide1987
It's pretty amazing just how big of a piece of shite Joe Biden has been his entire life.
Stupid bastard has the quote wrong as well. This is from monticello.org:
In a 1787 letter to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson used the phrase "tree of liberty":
I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: and very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a Chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: and what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent and persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.[1] The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.[2]
Anchor
Further Sources
Monticello Podcast: Jefferson's Words: Three Letters on the New U.S. Constitution includes audio of the letter that contains this quote, as read by Bill Barker, who interprets Thomas Jefferson at Monticello and elsewhere.
Thomas Jefferson on Politics & Government: Revolution and Reformation.
References
1 ^ This sentence has possibly been misquoted as "every generation needs a new revolution."
2 ^ Jefferson to Smith, November 13, 1787, in PTJ, 12:355-57. Transcription available at Founders Online.
Stupid bastard has the quote wrong as well. This is from monticello.org:
In a 1787 letter to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson used the phrase "tree of liberty":
I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: and very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a Chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: and what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent and persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, and what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusets? And can history produce an instance of a rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it’s motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20. years without such a rebellion.[1] The people can not be all, and always, well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independant 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century and half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusets: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen yard in order. I hope in god this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted.[2]
Anchor
Further Sources
Monticello Podcast: Jefferson's Words: Three Letters on the New U.S. Constitution includes audio of the letter that contains this quote, as read by Bill Barker, who interprets Thomas Jefferson at Monticello and elsewhere.
Thomas Jefferson on Politics & Government: Revolution and Reformation.
References
1 ^ This sentence has possibly been misquoted as "every generation needs a new revolution."
2 ^ Jefferson to Smith, November 13, 1787, in PTJ, 12:355-57. Transcription available at Founders Online.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:13 pm to RollTide1987
My theory:
I should be able to own everything the government does. If you don’t want me owning it then probably not a good idea for the government to own.
I should be able to own everything the government does. If you don’t want me owning it then probably not a good idea for the government to own.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:18 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
My theory:
I should be able to own everything the government does. If you don’t want me owning it then probably not a good idea for the government to own.
The nerve of this installed POS "president" saying what citizens can and can't own. Then threatening them by bragging the installers have bigger guns.
FJB FJB FJB
The "smartest man Biden knows" threw a gun in a dumpster. Then Brandon turns around and mumbles threats against the citizens. How far we've fallen.
ETA: My apologies, it was Hallie who threw Hunter's gun in a dumpster. But then again, Hunter isn't exactly famous for keeping track of his "guns."
This post was edited on 1/16/23 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:20 pm to RollTide1987
“Any man who has to say ‘I am the king’ is no king.”
- Tywin Lannister
A President who’s secure in his position wouldn’t feel the need to threaten the American people. Joe does it continually.
- Tywin Lannister
A President who’s secure in his position wouldn’t feel the need to threaten the American people. Joe does it continually.
This post was edited on 1/16/23 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:21 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
If you want to take on the federal government, you need some f-15s. You don't need an AR-15.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:22 pm to RollTide1987
Yeah we’ll if Pepsi would of just given me my jet it would of been on
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:22 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
you don't need an F-15 to take down the government.
Do you even Civics?
246 years of representative republic goes down the drain when you steal the Speaker's lectern, baw.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
to have him expound on what he's thinking
LOL. He isn't thinking a damn thing. A socialist speechwriter came up with this. Brandon can't figure out the logistics of a trip to the shitter.
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:28 pm to RollTide1987
We have 300,000,000 Americans. Lets just say 150,000,000 adults. 32-34% of adults own a gun. Lets call it 33%. That's 49,500,000 adults that own guns. of that 49,000,000 lets just say its 40 million patriots. The us military is 1.4 million strong. Of that 1.4 million a solid 70% would not follow orders to use forces on their own citizens. So, you would have 40,000,000 vrs. 9,920,000(420,000 from the military)
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:32 pm to RollTide1987
One would have to wonder IF joey bidet DID turn the military against the civilian population of the US, which would definitely be an ILLEGAL ORDER, how many of the military would actually OBEY??
This post was edited on 1/16/23 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 1/16/23 at 1:32 pm to mtb010
Let’s say it’s not even that lopsided numbers wise. How do fighter jets break the balance of power in such a domestic situation? It’s nonsensical if you ponder it for even just a second.
This post was edited on 1/16/23 at 1:33 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News