Started By
Message

re: Biden admin calls on SCOTUS to let police enter homes, confiscate guns without a warrant

Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:51 am to
Posted by The Quiet One
Former United States
Member since Oct 2013
11608 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:51 am to
Time to start using these guns on politicians.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:52 am to
quote:

The vast majority of the prosecution of this case took place under the Trump Administration



which was filled with closeted career bureaucrats who are incapable of being dislodged

and that is who did whatever they did

One fricking guy can't run herd over several million bureaucrats by himself.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53821 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case about whether law enforcement officers can enter people’s home and confiscate guns without a warrant, Forbes reported.

quote:
Moreover, the court mentioned that a police officer “must act as a master of all emergencies, who is ‘expected to…provide an infinite variety of services to preserve and protect community safety.’” By allowing law enforcement to act without a warrant, the community caretaking exception is “designed to give police elbow room to take appropriate action,” the court added.



Maybe I could in fact support "defund police"
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22545 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:57 am to
We have became Nazi Germany or damn Bolsheviks. Take your pick. The Supreme Court other than Thomas and Alito are worthless cowards.
This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:02 am
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
19364 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:58 am to
quote:

Local LE won't do this

Just like they'd never enforce a mask mandate, much less assault and use the tasers on people not complying? Like that?

Some of y'all need to really wake up. There would be mass walk offs in many local PDs, but the ones who stick around would absolutely enforce this kind of no sense. Now, how long they'd remain among the living is debatable.
This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:19 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:58 am to
quote:

quote:

The vast majority of the prosecution of this case took place under the Trump Administration
which was filled with closeted career bureaucrats who are incapable of being dislodged
Do you actually believe that appeal of a case to SCOTUS on 2nd/4th amendment issues was not vetted by someone at the level of a political appointee?

OK

You are so-blinded by hate that you are blaming Biden for Trump's actions. Seriously, there are plenty of reasons to dislike Biden, but in this case put the blame where it belongs.

This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:03 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
75090 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Zero progstains in this thread and only one Hank.



Yup with maximum TDS
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20531 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:01 am to
no chance youre coming in w no warrants
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141558 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:02 am to
What facts bothered me?
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
6189 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:03 am to
AA12 Full auto shotgun


Shotgun Dragoon regiment

[quote]As Dennis Prager often says, the bigger the government, the smaller the person.
This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:15 am
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27407 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Local LE won't do this


LOL, I live in an area where most people know the local LE and I regret to inform you, there are several that would jump off a damn bridge if they were told to do so...
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:04 am to
There was a time in their country where he would have been impeached for this, and he should be now. If we aren’t there, yet, we will be there when they pack the court later this year
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17530 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Warrantless confiscation of guns impact Id wager majority conservative voters.

You don't think this is about places like Southside Chicago? Don't think the intent is to clean up the ghetto?

You'd be right of course. Cops are dumb but not stupid enough to try raiding ghettos of guns. The cops really would be collecting, one bullet at a time, in those areas.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53109 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:05 am to
quote:

The vast majority of the prosecution of this case took place under the Trump Administration


I know Trump lives in your head but...

quote:

Caniglia v. Strom, Forbes senior contributor Nick Sibilla wrote, is a case that could have wide-ranging consequences for policing, due process, mental health, as well as the Fourth Amendment. Notably, as part of the case, the Biden administration and attorneys general from nine states are calling on the court to uphold warrantless gun confiscation.


quote:

On the other hand, the Biden administration in its first amicus brief for the Supreme Court disregarded these worries and urged the court to uphold the First Circuit’s ruling.


So i know you'd love to blame Trump for this, but it is indeed, a Biden admin clusterfrick. Sorry to ruin your narrative. Maybe read the link next time.
This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:05 am
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15585 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:07 am to
Wait I thought we had an issue with no knock warrants?

Now we don’t need a warrant AT ALL?
This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:08 am
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:09 am to
quote:

BugAC
Good Lord.

Yes, THAT reporter writes as if Biden somehow got this case all the way to SCOTUS from non-existence in a couple of months.

When was the case tried? When was the appeal to the CoA filed? When was the Petition for Writ filed?
This post was edited on 3/25/21 at 8:10 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53109 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Husband and wife had fight in their home. Husband pulled gun and sounded suicidal. Wife left house and called police, asking for welfare check on husband. Police and wife returned to home, and police eventually took husband into custody for psych evaluation. Police also took possession of firearms. Wife gave permission for all of this.


You are leaving out some vital parts of the story.

quote:

The police, however, did not conduct the check according to the books. They then insisted that Mr. Caniglia go to the hospital for an evaluation, though Mr. Caniglia refused, emphasizing that his mental health wasn’t their business. Mr. Caniglia agreed only after police promised—albeit falsely—they would not confiscate his guns while he was away.


quote:

Furthermore, officers then told Mrs. Caniglia that her husband had consented to the seizure, and she led them to the two handguns they owned, which were then seized. Despite Mr. Caniglia being immediately discharged from the hospital, police only gave back the firearms after he filed a civil rights case against them.




WHy are you intentionally omitting details from the case? In this instance, the villagers are correct in being "riled up". Trump owns property in your head, doesn't he?
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
15568 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:09 am to
quote:

“must act as a master of all emergencies, who is ‘expected to…provide an infinite variety of services to preserve and protect community safety.’”


OK, what about all the times when drug addicts are resisting arrest? Is that not an act of emergency?

DOUBLE STANDARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!
AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53109 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:11 am to
quote:

When was the appeal to the CoA filed? When was the Petition for Writ filed?


Who gives a shite? I'll speak slowly...

quote:

On the other hand, the Biden administration in its first amicus brief for the Supreme Court disregarded these worries


DISREGARDED THESE WORRIES... That is what the thread is about, that is what the contention is about. Not the time the initial incident happened, you troglodyte.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53109 posts
Posted on 3/25/21 at 8:12 am to
quote:


You are so-blinded by hate that you are blaming Biden for Trump's actions




This case, literally, has nothing to do with Trump. You need a procedure to get Trump removed from your every day life.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram