- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Between now and the election, is an MKUltra school shooting a reasonable prediction?
Posted on 8/26/18 at 8:32 am to TX Tiger
Posted on 8/26/18 at 8:32 am to TX Tiger
Nothing in what you posted requires an establishment and a long term plan. Shootings happen naturally. People kill people and always have. That will sway some to be against guns. No establishment needed. Despite this, our gun rights have expanded significantly since over the last 30 years. The establishment is pretty bad at this game if they're plotting, but I believe it's simply pro-gun and anti-gun arguing with no master oversight.
quote:What are they winning?
The establishment wants us to continue to play the game, because the game is set up so that the establishment wins.
1
Posted on 8/26/18 at 9:02 am to Jake88
quote:Sure, and the establishment will use whatever they can to influence the public. Social engineering is real.
Nothing in what you posted requires an establishment and a long term plan. Shootings happen naturally. People kill people and always have. That will sway some to be against guns. No establishment needed.
quote:Again, it's a slow boil.
Despite this, our gun rights have expanded significantly since over the last 30 years. The establishment is pretty bad at this game if they're plotting
quote:Power and control.
The establishment wants us to continue to play the game, because the game is set up so that the establishment wins.
What are they winning?
Posted on 8/26/18 at 9:08 am to GumboPot
quote:
Wiki page.
Thanks - I knew of the substance of that research but did not recall the MKUltra moniker.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 9:18 am to Jake88
quote:
Why wait anyway? Australia took away guns quickly. And, no, I don't believe Americans would physically fight the government confiscating them despite all of the bluster. When it comes down to it, it's not 1840 and people are too comfortable to risk their lives over their guns.
WTF? Your liberal progressive side is showing.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 10:04 am to jimmy the leg
I don't have a liberal progressive side. You're missing the point I'm making with that statement.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 10:11 am to TX Tiger
Slow boil? Frost is starting to form on the sides of the pot. It's not some controlled master plan if it has taken decades or even a century and it's yet to come to fruition. It's simply an ebb and flow between pro gun and anti gun folks.
Power and control, fine. But that doesn't mean it's a particular few, an elite. Every generation has its new brokers. That will always be. Those in power now will pass and others will fill the void.
Power and control, fine. But that doesn't mean it's a particular few, an elite. Every generation has its new brokers. That will always be. Those in power now will pass and others will fill the void.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 1:12 pm to Jake88
quote:
I don't have a liberal progressive side. You're missing the point I'm making with that statement.
When what you wrote is your view point, then I feel that your liberal progressive side is showing. I find it hard to believe that you grew up in Covington with that mindset unless you are under 25 or something. The mindset that people would give up their guns so they can "stay comfortable" in their current lives shows a disconnect to conservative values imho. Your basically saying trust the government, and only the government, with your safety. I'll pass.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 1:57 pm to GumboPot
I'd be shocked if it didn't. Heck, one might be ongoing right now.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 1:59 pm to Seldom Seen
Holy shite! Did the Q thread predict this too?
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:00 pm to GumboPot
This is what the hardcore Trumpkin crew has become. Straight up bonafide tinfoil tards.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:02 pm to AUbused
quote:
This is what the hardcore Trumpkin crew has become. Straight up bonafide tinfoil tards.
Muh Collusion! The Russians rigged the election! Trump is a secret racist and anti-semite!
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:10 pm to kingbob
Have fun in the Q thread Bob. Sad to see you at a point where you’ll fit in there.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:14 pm to AUbused
I'm just pointing out that the media has been engaging in nothing but "conspiracy theories" for the past 2 years. It's so incredibly hypocritical.
It was really funny when in protest of Trump saying that the media was conspiring against him and using the same set of talking points 300 media outlets all ran the same op-ed to show their solidarity that they don't coordinate or conspire against him.
It was really funny when in protest of Trump saying that the media was conspiring against him and using the same set of talking points 300 media outlets all ran the same op-ed to show their solidarity that they don't coordinate or conspire against him.
This post was edited on 8/26/18 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:18 pm to kingbob
You are drawing an equivalence between an investigation that has a number of indictments and guilty pleas, a meeting between trumps son and top campaign brass with Russians under the pretense of attaining campaign dirt, and a friend/former campaign manager who was in contact with the fricking GRU to a Gumbopot false flag thead involving CIA shooting up a school dude.
You might want to consider a break.
You might want to consider a break.
This post was edited on 8/26/18 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:19 pm to AUbused
quote:
You are drawing an equivalence between an investigation that has a number of indictments and guilty pleas
For tax fraud and taxi medallion shenanigans from 10 years ago. Not one of the indictments or convictions which have come to light have had anything to do with the previous election, let alone with any Russian meddling, and you know that.
Literally the only shred of evidence in the entire "Russians hacked the election" narrative is the testimony by Crowdstrike, a 3rd party paid for by the democratic party who was permitted to examine their servers. The FBI never examined the servers and neither did any other law enforcement or intelligence agency, yet they all parrot the crowdstrike report. Doesn't that seem just a little bit fishy and tenuous? That the server was completely destroyed after crowdstrike examined it so no one else could see it? Doesn't that seem just a little bit suspect?
This post was edited on 8/26/18 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:20 pm to GumboPot
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:22 pm to kingbob
Great post snipping there. You should consider working for that media you hate so much.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:23 pm to AUbused
Great job not defending your position and instead engaging in ad-hominems. You should run for political office.
Posted on 8/26/18 at 2:28 pm to kingbob
I posted a bunch if corroborating encounters regarding the Russians.....you snipped and avoided them.
Anyway. Enjoy tinfoil life in the Q thread. Maybe next Ill see you making sweet posts about being super stoked that Obama is burning in hell on the day he dies. Next logical step.
Anyway. Enjoy tinfoil life in the Q thread. Maybe next Ill see you making sweet posts about being super stoked that Obama is burning in hell on the day he dies. Next logical step.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News