- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Beth Wilkinson formally files her entry of appearance for Judge Sullivan
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:50 pm
12
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:53 pm to cajunangelle
Let's see how many people read that screenshot in it's entirely 
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:53 pm to cajunangelle
I hope the Court throws it out so fast it breaks the sound barrier.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:54 pm to upgrayedd
people already corrected his date. can anyone guess Beth Wilkinson's retainer fee?
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:54 pm to cajunangelle
How is Sullivan a party to the case? 
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:55 pm to upgrayedd
Ten days, but may get a couple more depending on court rules.
This post was edited on 5/26/20 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:55 pm to cajunangelle
Why isn't DOJ involved? Flynn's civil rights are getting crapped on by this judge.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:57 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
can anyone guess Beth Wilkinson's retainer fee?
0
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:57 pm to cajunangelle
Really, what are we to make of a Federal Judge who needs to hire a lawyer to help him explain the law to his superiors? That alone is grounds to impeach him--isn't it the job of judges to interpret and apply the law? If he needs someone to do that for him, he's not qualified for his job!
Posted on 5/26/20 at 1:58 pm to cajunangelle
I especially like the: In re Michael T. Flynn v _________
There's no opposition to Flynn any longer. It's basically Sullivan's Court v Flynn.
There's no opposition to Flynn any longer. It's basically Sullivan's Court v Flynn.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:00 pm to Sidicous
Does Sullivan think he is Judge Judy?
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:00 pm to HubbaBubba
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:04 pm to DRMPHD
quote:
Really, what are we to make of a Federal Judge who needs to hire a lawyer to help him explain the law to his superiors?
Is there any precedent AT ALL for this? I haven't seen it, if so.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:05 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I’m unaware of any, which means we may be seeing legal history.
That doesn’t bode well for Sullivan IMHO.
That doesn’t bode well for Sullivan IMHO.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:05 pm to cajunangelle
FWIW Beth Wilkinson and Kathryn Rummler are BFFs. For those that don't know Kathryn Rummler is Obama's "fixer", personal attorney.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:08 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
How is Sullivan a party to the case?
It is certainly extraordinary for a judge who is requested to respond to the appeals court by the appeals court to hire counsel to do so in his behalf. I wonder if the appeals court will accept Beth Wilkinson's response on behalf of Sullivan? This is really odd.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:10 pm to upgrayedd
I didn't know that it had to be formally expressed in writing if a lawyer was working pro bono.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:11 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is there any precedent AT ALL for this? I haven't seen it, if so.
The experts said that SCOTUS just ruled against judicial actions a year ago exactly like the actions of judge Sullivan 9-0 and the leading opinion written by liberal favorite RBG.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:13 pm to GumboPot
quote:And yet it happens before our eyes. It is like watching craziness.
The experts said that SCOTUS just ruled against judicial actions a year ago exactly like the actions of judge Sullivan 9-0 and the leading opinion written by liberal favorite RBG.
Posted on 5/26/20 at 2:14 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It is certainly extraordinary for a judge who is requested to respond to the appeals court by the appeals court to hire counsel to do so in his behalf. I wonder if the appeals court will accept Beth Wilkinson's response on behalf of Sullivan? This is really odd.
Can Beth Wilkinson render the verdict against Flynn? Isn't this just another duty of the court to reply to the higher court's questions?
Page 1 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News