Started By
Message

re: AZ Senate Passes 'Right to Discriminate' Bill

Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:54 am to
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
4897 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

So... Theft of life isn't immoral?
I never said that. The morality of it has nothing to do with our laws.

Try to keep up.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
88976 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

because its there right to discriminate. so lets just appeal civil rights then.


Freedom of association is actually an enumerated right.

The desire of Adam and Steve to have a wedding cake from the bakery of their choice? Not so much.
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

hawkeye007


I ask again:

quote:

Assume that I'm a Catholic baker. A Catholic couple comes and asks for a wedding cake, but one of them is thrice-divorced. As a Catholic, I believe that that marriage is wrong and does not actually exist, so I refuse to bake their cake. Am I a bigot?
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8590 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

The morality of it has nothing to do with our laws.


What is the standard for morality and who determines it?
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:59 am to
quote:

standard for morality
There is none.
quote:

who determines it
You do.
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
4897 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 11:59 am to
quote:

What is the standard for morality and who determines it?
Why do you ask me?

Ask FT.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6297 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:00 pm to
i am a little confused by this question, so the baker and the person are both catholic? did the baker pull out a questionaire to figure out about the 3 divorces. i have a noble idea how about we leave the judgment up to god?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
62079 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:03 pm to
And how would a business know someone is gay?
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
4897 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

id the baker pull out a questionaire to figure out about the 3 divorces. i have a noble idea how about we leave the judgment up to god?
You didn't address his question.

Regardless how the info on the divorces came out or who is to judge them, IS THE BAKER A BIGOT?
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39626 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

thats a great leap you made to me pissing on the bible. almost as big as the leap you are making with the right to Free Association.


I admit to be a "leaper", Hawk; and my 'pissin' comment is on the edge...so I'll bow to your indignation on that one.

But will you address the point. You really think that the Government of the day, according to the will of the majority...ought to decide just what should be viewed as moral...and that the government should then FORCE YOU to associate/promote ideas and beliefs which you might find misguided or abhorrent?

And where will you stand on the day that this Nation - for whatever reason, plenty there - is rocked to her core and the call to 'go back to god' and restore our country rings out. Mob rule can get ugly.

Live and learn.

Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6297 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:13 pm to
yes the baker is a bigot, little background on my self here. i was raised in a strict pentecostal family. my grandfather was a minister his whole life. both sides of my family was pentecostal. at the age of 14 i made the decision that i did not want to associate with such a close minded religion. when i married my wife she was methodist and i have since considered myself a methodist because of there acceptence of everyone. our forefathers had the thought that state and church to be seperate why cant we? i think a church has the right to allow and not allow who ever they want in there congregation. if the they dont want to allow people due to thier race or sexual orientation then that is there right. but last time i check these buisineses are not churches.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

yes the baker is a bigot
frick off.
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
6297 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:17 pm to
when was this nation led by god? Politicians pander there religous believes to win elections.
Posted by Lg
Hayden, Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
8590 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

The morality of it has nothing to do with our laws.


Not directed at you. Just took what you said as far as morality and our laws. People say you can't legislate morality.

So who determines what is moral and immoral and by what standard is it judged?
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39626 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:18 pm to
ps...hawk...listening to Rush...check out the new law just passed in Uganda. Wide support from vast majority...death sentence for prolonged homosexuality.

That Constitution, which LIMITS the government and the power of the mob...is a beautiful thing. For as long as it stands anyway.

Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:24 pm to
You can't possibly support that law.
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
4897 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

our forefathers had the thought that state and church to be seperate why cant we?
I'm with you there! Further, government should not force people to do things, especially things contrary to their religious beliefs.

As one raised in a strict pentecostal environment, which you now somewhat reject as too close minded, do you think it is the place of government to tell strict pentecostals how to raise their children and force them to do it that way? Or would that not also be patently close minded?
quote:

i think a church has the right to allow and not allow who ever they want in there congregation.
But a business does not have the right to server or not serve based on moral and or ethical considerations?
quote:

but last time i check these buisineses are not churches.
So, why do churches have special rights that individuals or other organizations do not?
This post was edited on 2/25/14 at 12:34 pm
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28247 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

You can't possibly support that law.


It's the law of the land. Why would anyone fight it?...
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:28 pm to
Is this some roundabout Obamacare reference?
Posted by los angeles tiger
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:28 pm to
He's been well indoctrinated. The Bill of Rights are INDIVIDUAL rights, and individuals have the right to practice their faith without government interference. He prefers government trampling over that right because he's a statist.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 36
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 36Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram