- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AZ Senate Passes 'Right to Discriminate' Bill
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:32 pm to los angeles tiger
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:32 pm to los angeles tiger
quote:I'm attempting to enlighten him.
he's a statist.
1
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:33 pm to LSUnKaty
Who are we talking about, Ron Paul?
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:35 pm to FT
I've given up trying to enlighten you, but I'm still hopeful others are not so far gone.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:36 pm to LSUnKaty
On what? What a statist is?
How is a Congressman not a statist?
How is a Congressman not a statist?
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:39 pm to los angeles tiger
The Bill of Rights was not written for buisiness but the rights of people. And yes i would have a problem with the goverment coming into churches and telling them what they cant teach and preach. but we are not talking about churches or individual rights we are talking about what a buisiness can and cant do. so LA Tiger you can call me a statist(i think you ment satist) all you want but dont confuse INDIVIDUAL rights with laws that regulate buisiness
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:41 pm to RCDfan1950
you really made the jump to Uganda and thier constitution. so what your telling me is you are in favor of the death sentence for homosexuality?
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:42 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
hawkeye007
If a gay couple wanted to commission me to paint a picture of them embracing should I be forced by the government to paint said picture? Do I have a right to refuse?
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:44 pm to hawkeye007
quote:The two are intertwined. You can't regulate one without affecting the other.
dont confuse INDIVIDUAL rights with laws that regulate buisiness
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:45 pm to FT
quote:What does this have to do with anything we are talking about? Ron Paul has nothing to do with the AZ Senate. As a matter of fact, he is no longer a Congressman, so by your logic not a statist.
How is a Congressman not a statist?
Did the light come on yet?
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:46 pm to LSUnKaty
I dunno. People are accusing people of being statists like that's a bad thing. Like 99% of the population is statist.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:46 pm to GumboPot
quote:No you don't as a bidness man you must bow to their will.
If a gay couple wanted to commission me to paint a picture of them embracing should I be forced by the government to paint said picture? Do I have a right to refuse?
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:47 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
The Bill of Rights was not written for buisiness but the rights of people. And yes i would have a problem with the goverment coming into churches and telling them what they cant teach and preach. but we are not talking about churches or individual rights we are talking about what a buisiness can and cant do. so LA Tiger you can call me a statist(i think you ment satist) all you want but dont confuse INDIVIDUAL rights with laws that regulate buisiness
The problem is that businesses are owned by individuals. Businesses are made of and made by individuals. Individuals work at businesses, run businesses, and pay taxes from those businesses.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:48 pm to GumboPot
enough with the "if" questions its not a perfect situation where everyone will be happy. but its a bill that allows people to discriminate and any bill thats allows this is just wrong.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:49 pm to Lg
quote:
I think he has a bigger problem with the government protecting religious freedoms.
Those poor Christians...so much persecution in this country.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:49 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
enough with the "if" questions its not a perfect situation where everyone will be happy. but its a bill that allows people to discriminate and any bill thats allows this is just wrong.
Chalk up another one who's against individual freedom.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:49 pm to Sentrius
quote:
Refusal of service is not infringement.
bullshite and you well know it.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:50 pm to hawkeye007
quote:Why?
enough with the "if" questions its not a perfect situation where everyone will be happy. but its a bill that allows people to discriminate and any bill thats allows this is just wrong.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:50 pm to Sentrius
quote:
They're not. This bill does no such thing.
Once more, bullshite.
And you well know this.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:51 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
this thread makes me sad for America. The fact that a state would allow buisineses to discriminate is a shame. what's even more shamefull is the amount of people defending the state's right because its there right to discriminate. so lets just appeal civil rights then.
Pretty much.
You know how I can tell this message board is located in the south..
...not from the accents in the posts.
Posted on 2/25/14 at 12:51 pm to asurob1
quote:
Refusal of service is not infringement.
quote:
bullshite and you well know it
If you have other equal or better options open to you, it's absolutely not infringement. And you know it.
Page 15 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News