Are there really any Dems that think these are good reasons to start an investigation?

But what I described in the OP really happened. In America. By the federal government in America.

Please don't confuse these actions as the behavior of the old Soviet Union police state. This happened in America. The U.S.A.

Anything is a valid reason when your hatred has a longer reach than your reason.

quote:

---

1. A joke on the campaign trail.

---

A Joke!? A JOKE!?! Inviting Russia to hack our election is not a joke son. It was a dog whistle to his comrades. Reeeee!!!

NPC’s don’t think, they do

quote:

---

To start an investigation, criminal or otherwise, on the duly elected and sitting president based on the following reasons:
1. A joke on the campaign trail.
2. Differences in foreign policy objectives.
3. Firing the director of the FBI.

Are those valid reason to open an investigation on the sitting president?

---

You assume some pretty slim facts. Let's flesh this out with some equally valid assumptions:
1. He made a cash deal with the Russian President to be paid for undermining America and causing chaos.
2. He solicited bribes internationally.
3. He personally murdered three people.

If we assume those facts to be true, is it ok to investigate the President?

My assumed facts are as valid as yours, because neither of us know all the facts.

Let's make up some more, shall we?