- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Are libs seriously going to deny there's a problem with the FBI?
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:16 pm
Seriously, you're okay with the investigative team being blatantly biased against Trump and being pro-Hillary?
So, you wouldn't have a problem if it were the other way around? No problem with the lead investigator of Hillary texting "frick Hillary"?
Cause if you don't, I hope Trump fires the whole management of the Bureau and replaces them with extreme right wing zealots who are willing to go scorched earth on the left.
What's good for the goose......
So, you wouldn't have a problem if it were the other way around? No problem with the lead investigator of Hillary texting "frick Hillary"?
Cause if you don't, I hope Trump fires the whole management of the Bureau and replaces them with extreme right wing zealots who are willing to go scorched earth on the left.
What's good for the goose......
22
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:16 pm to bhtigerfan
It's not a problem for them ... yet.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:17 pm to bhtigerfan
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:19 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Cruiserhog
You're extremely rabid and do not have a normal functioning brain. Your opinion is invalid since you're under psychiatric care and evaluation since November of 2016.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:20 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:Yes.
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
Would you be okay with me leading an investigation of Hillary or Obama?
I know I sure as fricking hell wouldn't trust you to be objective.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:20 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
Of course it doesn't "automatically", but bias is admissible under the rules of evidence and it weighs heavily in the mind of the factfinder.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:21 pm to Motorboat
quote:Odd the same guy interviewed Hillionaire with no notes, no video, no sworn testimony.
Of course it doesn't "automatically", but bias is admissible under the rules of evidence and it weighs heavily in the mind of the factfinder.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:21 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively
Only if they plot to remove a POTUS like "insurance plans"
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:23 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
It's not "having" a bias, CH...it's having the "appearance" of a bias that is the criteria for recusal.
If the Left thinks they get a pass on this...they are sorely mistaken, and will pay dearly for the blatant politicization of the Government Bureaucracy.
Obama was/is no better than Putin. Obama threw D'Souza in JAIL, for a minor campaign contribution infraction. Of the which 3/4 of Contributors could be found guilty of. And the whole Dem Party and most all of the Reps stood by and did NOTHING.
That dog won't hunt. It's the stuff that destroys the political process...and ends up at the barrel of a gun.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:24 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
Good point
A high integrity individual will do this.
Also, EVERYONE has personal bias.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:25 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
Apparently
Look at the FBIs treatment of Flynn vs Clinton for instance, though there are many
Flynn questioned and lied, being pursued on that alone since law wasn’t broken in regards to what they were pursuing in questioning
Hillary questioned, was made more “formal,” lied her arse off, and had also broken the law in regards to what they were pursuing during questioning. Nothing, and nothing
FBI and DOJ trying to damage trump while not interested in punishing democratic leadership. They are still their former bosses soldiers fighting in a political war.
This post was edited on 12/13/17 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:25 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
does someone having a personal bias automatically exclude them from looking at facts objectively.
Is this a joke or...
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:26 pm to bhtigerfan
Military is pro-Trump doe.
Why don’t y’all just get them to invade the FBI,IRS, NSA, and everyone else who hates your stupid arses.
frick your sensitivities and trump’s feelings.
Why don’t y’all just get them to invade the FBI,IRS, NSA, and everyone else who hates your stupid arses.
frick your sensitivities and trump’s feelings.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:27 pm to EthanL
quote:Rule of law fool.
Why don’t y’all just get them to invade the FBI,IRS, NSA, and everyone else who hates your stupid arses.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:28 pm to bhtigerfan
Y'all like to knee-jerk scream "horrors, horrors" and then want everyone to scream with you. Sorry, won't do it. Let's just see how this shakes out first.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:29 pm to bhtigerfan
The libs ARE the problem with the fbi
This post was edited on 12/13/17 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:31 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:Democrats are locked up by Republican district attorneys every day and vice versa. A LEO having political views isn't a problem unless it bleeds into their professional judgment. This Strzok guy sounds like an example of that, but then he was reassigned. I'm not willing to extend one guy's texts to an entire investigative team or government organization.
Seriously, you're okay with the investigative team being blatantly biased against Trump and being pro-Hillary?
quote:I'd be shocked if FBI investigators didn't hate Hillary's guts. Where do you think Giuliani got all his leaks?
So, you wouldn't have a problem if it were the other way around? No problem with the lead investigator of Hillary texting "frick Hillary"?
This post was edited on 12/13/17 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:32 pm to bhtigerfan
There's long been a problem with the FBI.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:33 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:None of that is true.
Seriously, you're okay with the investigative team being blatantly biased against Trump and being pro-Hillary?
Posted on 12/13/17 at 2:33 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
None of that is true.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News