- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AP: memo authorizes ICE to enter homes by force without a judicial warrant
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:50 am to 4x4tiger
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:50 am to 4x4tiger
quote:
Seems to me if you're here illegally, you do not have United States Constitutional rights. Out you go....GTFO
Newsflash: Even if 10,000 people witness and record video of you murdering a child in the middle of Times Square, you have United States Constitutional rights.
1
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's an opinion, not a fact, and it's nothing more than fear porn. Fear is an emotion.
More triggering , very interesting.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:51 am to JimEverett
quote:
based solely on a more narrow administrative warrant
Go to Oakdale and tell that to judge duck and see what happens.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:51 am to Azkiger
quote:
No borders no country.
Thats logical. Not emotional.
The primary issue now is relevancy. This has nothing to do with our 4th Amendment, administrative warrants, or your fear porn
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:52 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
More triggering , very interesting.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:52 am to Ag Zwin
quote:
Newsflash: Even if 10,000 people witness and record video of you murdering a child in the middle of Times Square, you have United States Constitutional rights.
What does that have to do with whether or not people proved to be non-US citizens are still protected by the constitution?
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
So still the only thing interesting about this article corrupt lawyers advising their clients to break the law with no consequence.
I think we can wrap this one up.
I think we can wrap this one up.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The primary issue now is relevancy. This has nothing to do with our 4th Amendment, administrative warrants, or your fear porn
So you admit you were wrong?
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:54 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So still the only thing interesting about this article corrupt lawyers advising their clients to break the law with no consequence.
You can say silly things 1000 times and it doesn't make it true or correct.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:54 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
So if any evidence of a crime were uncovered as part of execution of this administrative warrant , it would be inadmissible in a criminal trial, correct?
Under DHS' apparent theory - no. The agents have properly entered the residence with their Administrative Warrant.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:55 am to Azkiger
quote:
So you admit you were wrong?
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You can say silly things 1000 times and it doesn't make it true or correct.
Good thing I was 100 percent correct on the first try.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:56 am to Turbeauxdog
I can see how a person who can't read good would make that claim. You just keep displaying the disability.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:56 am to SlowFlowPro
About your emotional-bases rhetoric claim. Jesus Christ, you said it like 5 or 10 minutes ago. Youre like a damn goldfish.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:57 am to JimEverett
quote:
The agents have properly entered the residence with their Administrative Warrant.
For execution of the removal order.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:57 am to Azkiger
quote:
About your emotional-bases rhetoric claim.
When fear stops being an emotion, then I'll be wrong. As of this post, it's still an emotion, so I'm not wrong.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:58 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
For execution of the removal order.
Sure. I guess I do not understand your point.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:58 am to JimEverett
quote:
Sure. I guess I do not understand your point.
Notice what he didn't quote.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I can see how a person who can't read good would make that claim. You just keep displaying the disability.
Dude, I wish you had enough self awareness to know when you're embarrassing yourself.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:59 am to Mushroom1968
quote:
The officer also has probable cause.
Probable cause of what exactly? If the officer has probable cause to justify an arrest, he can get a neutral federal judge to sign off on a warrant.
Following the logic in this thread, if a Democrat wins and declares a group like the NRA as a terrorist organization and orders the ATF to issue themselves administrative warrants to detain everyone who donated to them as materially contributing financial support to a terrorist organization then that is totally fine.
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News