- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anthony Weiner got jail for sexting minor; Moore will get elected Senator for molesting
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:05 pm to SDVTiger
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:05 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
You are melting hard over this allegation
I have yet to see a single person melt over this. More like being in awe at the new depth of tribal depravity this place manages to find almost weekly to excuse even the most deplorable behavior or actions by their tribe. While often moralizing about other tribes simultaneously, or at a minimum trying to deflect responsibility by whatabouting, kept up as long as the other person has a D or GOP-E label they feel they have to fight against. Principles and hypocrisy be damned.
1
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:05 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
1- There was evidence that Weiner was doing that. He was busted.
2- There is no evidence that Moore did this.
Which is what is in my OP.
But rape, molestation cases and a whole host of sex crime convictions have come without physical evidence. Yes, evidence is a big helper in determining guilt, but witness statements are also forms of evidence. There are 4 different women, as of today. Timing suspect? Weiner would say the same.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:06 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
I have yet to see a single person melt over this. More like being in awe at the new depth of tribal depravity this place manages to find almost weekly to excuse even the most deplorable behavior or actions by their tribe. While often moralizing about other tribes simultaneously, or at a minimum trying to deflect responsibility by whatabouting, kept up as long as the other person has a D or GOP-E label they feel they have to fight against. Principles and hypocrisy be damned.
So damn spot on.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:07 pm to marklsu
One is easier to prove than the other.
One was actually charged, represented by counsel, and convicted.
One was given his day in court.
See the difference?
One was actually charged, represented by counsel, and convicted.
One was given his day in court.
See the difference?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:07 pm to marklsu
quote:
Timing suspect? Weiner would say the same.
What does timing have to do with hard physical evidence AND admitting to the crime?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:09 pm to marklsu
quote:
There are 4 different women,
AND only 1 saying any type of sexual acts happened.
quote:
Timing suspect? Weiner would say the same.
No he wouldn't. He said "Guilty"
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:13 pm to HempHead
quote:
If the accusations had been made without evidence, it surely would have been a case of political slimery. However, as I pointed out, there was clear and undeniable evidence for the allegations - hard to feel like a victim at that point, right?
I'm certainly no fan of Moore, and I wouldn't be surprised if the allegations end up being true, but that's not how our system works. Claims require evidence - otherwise, it's piss in the wind.
Umm... witness statements and personal testimony is evidence. It has convicted many an offender... even without physical evidence.
And let's not get too self righteous with the notion of evidence. There was "evidence" that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, until there wasn't.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:14 pm to marklsu
quote:
marklsu
I see those checks from the Clinton Foundation have started rolling in again.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:16 pm to marklsu
quote:
Umm... witness statements and personal testimony is evidence.
You like raping small boys.
There is now evidence of you raping small boys.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:16 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
No he wouldn't. He said "Guilty"
Yes he did... but timing of the revelations point to political schemes. That was my point.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:18 pm to marklsu
quote:
Umm... witness statements and personal testimony is evidence. It has convicted many an offender... even without physical evidence.
You are correct, but no one has ever been convicted based on non-oathbound claims made in a newspaper. It looks like Moore may file suit against WaPo, so we will see what kind of discovery goes on.
quote:
And let's not get too self righteous with the notion of evidence. There was "evidence" that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, until there wasn't.
Those are entirely different situations. One is a legal matter, the other is justification for military action. Unfortunately, the burden of proof is not exactly high on our government to conduct an operation.
This post was edited on 11/10/17 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:19 pm to Centinel
quote:
You like raping small boys.
There is now evidence of you raping small boys.
Nice try... but that isn't what's happening here. It's apparent you haven't read the WP article.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:19 pm to marklsu
Your Dems are going to keep Menendez around, a guy who did under aged hookers.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:19 pm to marklsu
Melt 
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:20 pm to marklsu
The comparison with Weiner is pretty awful. If it was me, I would argue Jeremy Piven, as he's been ostricized with very little evidence.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:20 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
The comparison with Weiner is pretty awful. If it was me, I would argue Jeremy Piven, as he's been ostricized with very little evidence.
That's my main beef with this - Weiner is an awful comparison, given what we know at the moment.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:21 pm to marklsu
quote:
Nice try... but that isn't what's happening here. It's apparent you haven't read the WP article.
No, you said testimony is evidence.
I testify that you rape small boys. There is now evidence of your raping small boys...using your fricking stupid definition of what is "evidence."
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:21 pm to marklsu
Melt for lunch?
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:22 pm to marklsu
quote:
Umm... witness statements and personal testimony is evidence. It has convicted many an offender... even without physical evidence.
That doesn't sound like something that happens on anything approaching a regular basis.
Posted on 11/10/17 at 1:23 pm to marklsu
Unless I read wrong, the girls weren't legally minors
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News