Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann calling for Judge Aileen Cannon removal for being too novice or partisan

Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:06 am to
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98236 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Buddy...

Nevermind.



Figured you wouldnt provide a coherent answer
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Buddy... Nevermind.


Another eloquent and compelling “argument”. Like always, you bring receipts!
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:08 am to
You want Steinbeck to argue with Foghorn Leghorn. Better for me to move on.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:09 am to
quote:

You want Steinbeck to argue with Foghorn Leghorn. Better for me to move on.


You have yet to bring a single argument to this thread. Your delusions of grandeur combined with your complete ignorance of basic procedure are astonishing.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98236 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:10 am to
Still nothing

This is like when you ask this board whats Rons path to Victory in 2024 if he gets the nom

Same tard answers from the cult
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
47613 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:11 am to
funny. a partisan DOJ goes after a former opposition party president for documents, while they ignore hoards of documents held by the current president. Then they screech that the judge in the case they created whole-cloth, is the partisan.

clownworld
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:15 am to
quote:

You have yet to bring a single argument to this thread. Your delusions of grandeur combined with your complete ignorance of basic procedure are astonishing.

The extent of your argument here is "she cited a rule". You're being backed up by HPVTiger, the most vapid and empty poster on TD.

This subject was already discussed in better thread with better posters. There, I made my argument.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:16 am to
quote:

The extent of your argument here is "she cited a rule"


That is precisely what happened. She reminded counsel of procedure. You say that makes her an idiot. That is the extent of your “argument”.

quote:

This subject was already discussed in better thread with better posters. There, I made my argument.


that’s what I thought. Hubris and ignorance are a fascinating combination.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:19 am to
quote:

. There, I made my argument.



A completely vapid argument.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Hubris and ignorance are a fascinating combination.

It's the norm.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:25 am to
From you, for sure. You got absolutely destroyed in this thread, yet you keep coming back. It is fascinating to watch.
This post was edited on 11/6/23 at 8:26 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98236 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:27 am to
Still nothing from that Clown

Figures
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:28 am to
quote:

She's an idiot or worse.


That's rich.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42149 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:30 am to
quote:

It's "Haley," and I absolutely do this she's the best candidate.


What is it about carpet bombing brown people that you love so much?
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

From you, for sure. You got absolutely destroyed in this thread, yet you keep coming back. It is fascinating to watch.

Ignoring your posit in positivity here, you're not wrong. Her response is not a ruling. I'll reserve judgement until it comes. Thanks for the clarity.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Better for me to move on.


Correct. Like back to Reddit.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Ignoring your posit in positivity here, you're not wrong. Her response is not a ruling. I'll reserve judgement until it comes. Thanks for the clarity.


Still prattling without saying anything of substance. You’re out of your league here.
This post was edited on 11/6/23 at 8:34 am
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:34 am to
But I'm not. I'm agreeing with you. This could be a nothingburger.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
59471 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:36 am to
quote:

But I'm not. I'm agreeing with you. This could be a nothingburger.
it is a nothingburger. We are laughing at you because you called her an idiot over it. That was a dumb statement.
This post was edited on 11/6/23 at 8:37 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98236 posts
Posted on 11/6/23 at 8:36 am to
Zero substance from Mr Vapid himself

And conceding defeat
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram