- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Amendments
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:13 pm
Amendment 1-No
Amendment 2-Yes
Amendment 3-No
Amendment 4-No
Amendment 5-Yes
This is what I’ve decided. Anyone want to give me a reason to change a vote.
Amendment 2-Yes
Amendment 3-No
Amendment 4-No
Amendment 5-Yes
This is what I’ve decided. Anyone want to give me a reason to change a vote.
6
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:16 pm to tigger4ever
I know St George is amendment 2.
What is 5, age limits on judges?
I need to get the proper number but I figure I am voting yes on phasing out the inventory tax.
What is 5, age limits on judges?
I need to get the proper number but I figure I am voting yes on phasing out the inventory tax.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:21 pm to tigger4ever
Why vote yes in #5???
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:22 pm to tigger4ever
Let me help you out.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:28 pm to tigger4ever
Amendment 1-Yes
Amendment 2-No
Amendment 3-Yes
Amendment 4-Yes
Amendment 5-No
Amendment 2-No
Amendment 3-Yes
Amendment 4-Yes
Amendment 5-No
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:28 pm to lake chuck fan
I don’t have a problem changing the mandatory retirement on judges from 70 to 75 on amendment 5.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:33 pm to tigger4ever
I don’t have a problem with any of them. So many people are auto no votes for amendments to begin with. And for no good reason.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:36 pm to tigger4ever
[quote]I don’t have a problem changing the mandatory retirement on judges from 70 to 75 on amendment 5[/quote)
You should. It means the retarded Johnson twins get to frick up cases at the 19th for another term.
You should. It means the retarded Johnson twins get to frick up cases at the 19th for another term.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:39 pm to udtiger
quote:
You should. It means the retarded Johnson twins get to frick up cases at the 19th for another term.
This^^
It was tailor made for a couple old corrupt judges.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:40 pm to udtiger
quote:
You should. It means the retarded Johnson twins get to frick up cases at the 19th for another term.
Well their problem isn’t due to age so it’s missing the overall picture just to punish a couple of judges you dislike.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:41 pm to WestSideTiger
I always vote no on amendments.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:46 pm to tigger4ever
NO on 5. If they still want to sit on the bench at 75 they have ulterior motives. They should want to spend their golden years with their friends and family.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:49 pm to loogaroo
quote:
quote:
You should. It means the retarded Johnson twins get to frick up cases at the 19th for another term.
This^^
It was tailor made for a couple old corrupt judges
I asked the question in all sincerity. I'm not familiar with any of the amendment details, thats why I asked....
but, usually expanding limits of judiciary is a bad idea.
I'll vote no.
Thank y'all.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:53 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Why vote yes in #5???
Because the knees of young judges tend to jerk more than experienced ones.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:54 pm to lake chuck fan
Older judges are usually more conservative than the younger judges. Their track records are well established at that point for voters to decide.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:55 pm to sledgehammer
No on No. 1.
If you think Landry acts like Huey Long now, the last thing we need is to give him unlimited power over State employees. That is exactly what Long had and why the politicians that didn't side with him never had road/drainage projects in their area. THAT is what made Huey Long so powerful.
If you think Landry acts like Huey Long now, the last thing we need is to give him unlimited power over State employees. That is exactly what Long had and why the politicians that didn't side with him never had road/drainage projects in their area. THAT is what made Huey Long so powerful.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 5:59 pm to RougeDawg
You think Landry wants more State workers? And the civil service workforce already has too much protection. Much more than private.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:04 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
You think Landry wants more State workers?
That's not what I'm saying. He wants total control to steer funding to his friends or fire State employees that don't play ball. It's the main reason Civil Service was created in the first place.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 6:28 pm to justsaygeaux2
quote:
quote:
Why vote yes in #5???
Because the knees of young judges tend to jerk more than experienced ones.
And the old ones tend to continue whatever good ole boy corruption...
IMHO
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News